JARB Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotehnology

OPEN ACCESS pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663

Article Search

Original Article

Article Original Article
Split Viewer

Journal of Embryo Transfer 2014; 29(4): 321-325

Published online December 30, 2014

https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.4.321

Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.

Efficacy of a Cue-Mate Intravaginal Insert and Injection of Prostaglandin F for Synchronizing Estrus in Hanwoo Cattle

Sang-Rae Cho*, Kuldeep Kumar*, Seong-Heum Yeon, Sung-Hwan Lee, Ui-Hyung Kim, Ki-Yong Chung, Hyeon-Shup Kim, Myeung Sik Lee, Chang-Seok Park and Byoung-Chul Yang

Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Pyeongchang 232-950, Korea

Correspondence to: * Co-authors : chosr@korea.kr, shivalya@yahoo.com
† Correspondence : Bcyang@korea.kr

Received: November 1, 2014; Revised: November 28, 2014; Accepted: December 17, 2014

The present study was performed on farm animals to test the effectiveness of progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (Cue-Mate® 1.56 g) and injection of prostaglandin F (PGF) for synchronization estrus in Hanwoo cattle. The cattle were at random stage of the estrus cycle. The cows were artificially inseminated at day 7 after Cue-Mate withdrawal, using commercial semen from Korean native bulls. There was a season effect on the estrus synchronization rate. It was higher in spring (94.3%) followed by winter (93.3%), autumn (90.4%) and summer (67.2%). In summary, The results of this study revealed that season has influences on estrus behavior of cattle with no significant effect on pregnancy rate. In summary, we suggest summer reproductive management to alleviate the effects of heat stress. It should be based on intensive cooling combined with hormonal treatment. Given that different subgroups of cows benefit differently from the treatments, selective hormonal administration should be considered.

Keywords: estrus, synchronization, CIDR, Cue-mate

Several methods can be used to synchronize estrus in cattle (Patterson et al., 1989; Odde, 1990; Larson and Ball, 1992). Most methods employ an injection of prostaglandin F (PGF) that regresses the corpus luteum (CL). Regression of the CL (luteolysis) is followed by the development of a preovulatory follicle, behavioral estrus, and ovulation (Lauderdale et al., 1974). Prostaglandin F, however, will not regress developing CL that is present in the ovary during the first five days of the estrous cycle (Lauderdale, 1972). Estrus can be synchronized by shortening the luteal phase with PGF or by artificially extending it with progestins (Odde, 1990; Beal, 1998). Typical Fixed Time Artificial Insemination (FTAI) protocols use combinations of progestin and progesterone (P4) implants, oestradiol benzoate (ODB), PGF and equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG)(McGowan, 1999; Bo et al., 2003; Baruselli et al., 2004). Short-term treatment with intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing inserts (CIDR-B, InterAg, Hamilton, New Zealand) produced tight synchrony of estrus, but fertility was variable and related to duration of insert treatment (Iwazumi et al., 1994; Xu and Burton, 2000). The select synch protocol (injection of GnRH 7 d before an injection of PGF) produced estrus detection, conception, and pregnancy rates in beef heifers similar to those achieved after feeding melengestrol acetate for 14 days followed in 17 to 19 days of PGF or two injections of PGF (Stevenson et al., 1997). Generally, PGF have been used for estrus synchronization, either by themselves or in combination with progestins, estrogens, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)(Weems et al., 2006). Furthermore, PGF may enhance the effects of exogenous progesterone on the hypothalamus after progesterone withdrawal, thereby increasing pituitary responsiveness to GnRH (Randel et al., 1996) and inducing ovulation in ewes and cattle (Murdoch and McCormick., 1993).

Our objectives were to compare: 1) the ability of injection of PGF to synchronize estrus; and 2) the variability of estrual characteristics in Hanwoo cattle before their first AI (Artificial Insemination) and with their next eligible estrus preceding their second AI.

1. Synchronization Treatments and AI

Estrous cycles of all experimental animals were synchronized using a Cue-Mate (containing 1.56 g progesterone, BIONICHE, New Zealand, ES Plastics Inc.) intravaginal device for seven days and at same time by removing the cue-mate a 2.5-ml (i.m.) injection of PGF (LutalyseTM, Pfizer). Cows were inseminated using the AM/PM rule, where in a cow observed in standing estrus in the morning is inseminated in the afternoon of the same day, and a cow observed in standing estrus in the afternoon or evening is bred the following morning. Detection of estrus was done with the aid of a tail paint. It was performed four times with in a 24-hour period for 20 minutes (i.e., 6-hour intervals). All inseminations were performed by experienced technicians from commercial AI companies or by the herd owners and farm staff licensed to carry out AI. The study was conducted once in every season Spring (March∼May), Summer (Jun∼August), Autumn (September∼November) and Winter (December∼February) and in two regions, Pyeongchang-gun (one farm) and Yecheon-gun (two farm). For this study, 251 heads of Korean native cattle have been used. Pregnancy diagnosis was carried out about 60 days by uterus promotion.

2. Statistical Analysis

Differences among treatments were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure in the Statistical Analysis System package (version 6, 12). A probability of P<0.05 was to be statistically significant.

In winter estrus synchronization process, 45 heads of Hanwoo cattle were treated in Pyeongchang gun and Yecheon gun. Pregnancy rates ranged from 80.0 to 100% with an average of 91.1% after the second AI (Fig. 1). On the first conception rate ranged from 53.3 to 80%, with an average of 68.8% (31/45).

Figure 1. Winter estrus synchronization treatment in accordance with the regional conception rate and pregnancy rate.

In spring, 36 heads were treated. On the first conception rate ranged from 72.7 to 86.6% with an average of 80.5% (29/36), while the second rate ranged from 90.9 to 100% with an average of 94.4% (34/ 36) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2. One pregnancy rate and repair rate concept, regional spring estrus synchronization treatment-related.

In summer, estrus synchronization treatment was done in 107 cows. On the first time of conception the rate ranged from 52.6 to 80 %, with an average of 67.2% (72/107). While on the second time it ranged from 81.5∼100% with an average of 89.7% (96/107) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Pregnancy rate and one of the concepts repair rate over the same period due to the summer heat treatment area.

In autumn, on the other hand, the estrus synchronization treatment was done in 63 heads (Fig. 4). After modifying the pregnancy the rate ranged from 80.9 to 100%, with an average of 90.4% (57/63). The pregnancy rate is the future research program. The results showed that regardless of elevation - high (Pyeongchang) and middle (Yecheon),- pregnancy rates would be similar in the different seasons (Fig. 5).

Figure 4. Once the area is estimated estrus synchronization treat- ment-related pregnancy rate correction.
Figure 5. One concept conception rates and repair rates, due to seasonal treatment estrus synchronization region.

Once the amendment is estimated pregnancy rate due to Pyeongchang, summer, spring season estrus, appeared in the winter of orders, once corrected conception rate estimates because of Liquan County, spring, summer and winter seasons estrus synchronization in turn, results are displayed. Generally cooling systems are widely used in dairy farms to alleviate stress caused by summer heat. However, their ability to prevent its negative effects on reproduction is limited. Moreover, hormonal treatments given alone are not efficient at improving the fertility of hyperthermic cows.

In winter estrus synchronization process, 45 heads of Hanwoo cattle were treated in Pyeongchang gun and Yecheon gun. Pregnancy rates ranged from 80.0 to 100% with an average of 91.1% after the second AI (Fig. 1). On the first conception rate ranged from 53.3 to 80%, with an average of 68.8% (31/45).

In spring, 36 heads were treated. On the first conception rate ranged from 72.7 to 86.6% with an average of 80.5% (29/36), while the second rate ranged from 90.9 to 100% with an average of 94.4% (34/ 36) (Fig. 2).

In summer, estrus synchronization treatment was done in 107 cows. On the first time of conception the rate ranged from 52.6 to 80 %, with an average of 67.2% (72/107). While on the second time it ranged from 81.5∼100% with an average of 89.7% (96/107) (Fig. 3).

In autumn, on the other hand, the estrus synchronization treatment was done in 63 heads (Fig. 4). After modifying the pregnancy the rate ranged from 80.9 to 100%, with an average of 90.4% (57/63). The pregnancy rate is the future research program. The results showed that regardless of elevation - high (Pyeongchang) and middle (Yecheon),- pregnancy rates would be similar in the different seasons (Fig. 5).

Once the amendment is estimated pregnancy rate due to Pyeongchang, summer, spring season estrus, appeared in the winter of orders, once corrected conception rate estimates because of Liquan County, spring, summer and winter seasons estrus synchronization in turn, results are displayed. Generally cooling systems are widely used in dairy farms to alleviate stress caused by summer heat. However, their ability to prevent its negative effects on reproduction is limited. Moreover, hormonal treatments given alone are not efficient at improving the fertility of hyperthermic cows.

The ability to synchronize the onset of estrus, and the time of breeding and calving correspondingly, offers potential eco nomic and management benefits to dairy farmers. It increases the rate of genetic gain through the use of artificial insemination (AI) in genetically superior sires with high-accuracy expected progeny differences, increases milk production through advan cement of the mean calving date, and reduces the percentage of non-pregnant cows at the end of the breeding season (Xu et al., 1997).

Previous studies (Byerley et al., 1987; Perry et al., 1991) have demonstrated that heifers with multiple estrous cycles before the breeding season have an increased probability of becoming pregnant. The proportion of pubertal heifers at the start of the breeding season, however, can vary dramatically across herds (Lucy et al., 2001; Lamb et al., 2006) and is influenced by numerous factors, including age, weight, body condition, and breed (Wiltbank et al., 1966; Short and Bellows, 1971; Varner et al.,1977). Several fixed-time AI (FTAI) proto cols have been developed for beef heifers. FTAI pregnancy rates were similar between protocols. Although FTAI pregnancy rates were reduced in prepubertal heifers, within this subset of females the protocols of shorter duration (5dCO and PG-6d-CIDR) were as effective in prepubertal heifers as the longer protocol (14dCIDR-PG). This suggests an extended period of progesterone exposure is not required to effectively synchronize ovulation in prepubertal heifers(Bridges et al., 2014).

In summary, we suggest summer reproductive management to alleviate the effects of heat stress. It should be based on intensive cooling combined with hormonal treatment. Given that different subgroups of cows benefit differently from the treatments, selective hormonal administration should be considered.

  1. Baruselli PS, Reis EL, Marques MO, Nasser LF, Bo GA. 2004. The use of hormonal treatments to improve reproductive performance of anestrous beef cattle in tropical climates. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 82:479-486.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Beal WE, Chenault JR Day ML, Corah LR. 1988. Variation in conception rates following synchronization of estrus with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F. J. Anim. Sci. 66:599-602.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Bo GA, Baruselli PS, Martinez MF. 2003. Pattern and manipulation of follicular development in Bos indicus cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 78:307-326.
    CrossRef
  4. Bridges GA, Lake SL, Kruse SG, Bird SL, Funnell BJ, Arias R, Walker JA, Grant JK, Perry GA. 2014. Comparison of three CIDR-based fixed-time AI protocols in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 92:3127-3133.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Byerley DJ, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG, Short RE. 1987. Pregnancy rates of beef heifers bred either on puberal or third estrus. J. Anim. Sci. 65:645-650.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Iwazumi YY, Fukui RB, Vargas C, Nakano N, Sato M, Furudate K, Ohsaki S, Matsuzaki S. 1994. Superovulation using CIDR in Holstein cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 40:259-266.
    CrossRef
  7. Lamb GC, Larson JE, Geary TW, Stevenson JS, Johnson SK, Day ML, Ansotegui RP, Kesler DJ, DeJarnette MJ, Landblom DG. 2006. Synchronization of estrus and artificial insemination in replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2 alpha, and progesterone. J. Anim. Sci. 84:3000-3009.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Larson LL and Ball PJH. 1992. Regulation of estrous cycles in dairy cattle: a review. Theriogenology 38:255-267.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Lauderdale JW. 1972. Effects of PGF injection on pregnancy and estrous cycle of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 35:246.
  10. Lauderdale JW, Seguin BE, Stellflug JN, Chenault JR, Thatcher WW, Vincent CK, Loyancano AF. 1974. Fertility of cattle following PGF injection. J. Anim. Sci. 38:964-967.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Lucy MC, Billings HJ, Butler WR, Ehnis LR, Fields MJ, Kesler DJ, Kinder JE, Mattos RC, Short RE, Thatcher WW, Wettemann RP, Yelich JV, Hafs HD. 2001. Efficacy of an intravaginal progesterone insert and an injection of PGF-2alpha for synchronizing estrus and shortening the interval to pregnancy in postpartum beef cows, peripubertal beef heifers, and dairy heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 79:982-995.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. McGowan MR. 1999. Oestrus synchronization and time breeding programmes in Bos indicus and Bos indicus derived cattle. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposia on Animal Reproduction. Argentina, Cordoba, pp. 71-82.
  13. Murdoch WJ and McCormick RJ. 1993. Mechanisms and physiological implications of leucocyte chemoattraction into periovulatory ovine follicles. J. Reprod. Fertil. 97:375-380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Odde KG. 1990. A review of synchronization of estrus in post-partum cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:817-830.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Patterson DJ, Kiracofe GH, Stevenson JS, Corah LR. 1989. Control of the bovine estrous cycle with melengestrol acetate (MGA): A review. J. Anim. Sci. 67:1895-1906.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Perry RC, Corah L, Cochran RC, Brethour J, Olson KS, Higgins JJ. 1991. Effects of hay quality, breed, and ovarian development on onset of puberty and reproductive performance of beef heifers. J. Prod. Agric. 4:13-18.
    CrossRef
  17. Randel RD, Lammoglia MA, Lewis AW, Neuendorff DA, Guthrie MJ. 1996. Exogenous PGF(2)alpha enhanced GnRH-induced LH release in postpartum cows. Theriogenology. 45:643-54.
    CrossRef
  18. Short RE and Bellows RA. 1971. Relationship among weight gains, age at puberty and reproductive performance in heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 32:127-131.
    CrossRef
  19. Stevenson JS, Hoffman DP, Nichols DA, McKee RM, Krehbiel CL. 1997. Fertility in estrus-cycling and noncycling virgin heifers and suckled beef cows after induced ovulation. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1343-1350.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Varner LW, Bellows RA, Christensen DS. 1977. A management system for wintering replacement heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 44:165-171.
    CrossRef
  21. Weems CW, Weems YS, Randel RD. 2006. Prostaglandins and reproduction in female farm animals. Vet. J. 171:206-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Wiltbank JN, Gregor KE, Swinger LA, Ingalls JE, Rothlisberger JA, Koch RM. 1966. Effects of heterosis on age and weight at puberty in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 25:744-751.
    CrossRef
  23. Xu ZZ, Burton LJ, Macmillan KL. 1997. Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows following estrus synchronization regimens with PGF and progesterone. Theriogenology 47:687-701.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Xu, ZZ, Burton LJ. 2000. Estrus synchronization of lactating dairy cows with GnRH, progesterone, and prostaglandin F. J. Dairy Sci. 83:471-476.
    Pubmed CrossRef

Article

Original Article

Journal of Embryo Transfer 2014; 29(4): 321-325

Published online December 30, 2014 https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.4.321

Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.

Efficacy of a Cue-Mate Intravaginal Insert and Injection of Prostaglandin F for Synchronizing Estrus in Hanwoo Cattle

Sang-Rae Cho*, Kuldeep Kumar*, Seong-Heum Yeon, Sung-Hwan Lee, Ui-Hyung Kim, Ki-Yong Chung, Hyeon-Shup Kim, Myeung Sik Lee, Chang-Seok Park and Byoung-Chul Yang

Hanwoo Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA, Pyeongchang 232-950, Korea

Correspondence to:* Co-authors : chosr@korea.kr, shivalya@yahoo.com
† Correspondence : Bcyang@korea.kr

Received: November 1, 2014; Revised: November 28, 2014; Accepted: December 17, 2014

Abstract

The present study was performed on farm animals to test the effectiveness of progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (Cue-Mate® 1.56 g) and injection of prostaglandin F (PGF) for synchronization estrus in Hanwoo cattle. The cattle were at random stage of the estrus cycle. The cows were artificially inseminated at day 7 after Cue-Mate withdrawal, using commercial semen from Korean native bulls. There was a season effect on the estrus synchronization rate. It was higher in spring (94.3%) followed by winter (93.3%), autumn (90.4%) and summer (67.2%). In summary, The results of this study revealed that season has influences on estrus behavior of cattle with no significant effect on pregnancy rate. In summary, we suggest summer reproductive management to alleviate the effects of heat stress. It should be based on intensive cooling combined with hormonal treatment. Given that different subgroups of cows benefit differently from the treatments, selective hormonal administration should be considered.

Keywords: estrus, synchronization, CIDR, Cue-mate

INTRODUCTION

Several methods can be used to synchronize estrus in cattle (Patterson et al., 1989; Odde, 1990; Larson and Ball, 1992). Most methods employ an injection of prostaglandin F (PGF) that regresses the corpus luteum (CL). Regression of the CL (luteolysis) is followed by the development of a preovulatory follicle, behavioral estrus, and ovulation (Lauderdale et al., 1974). Prostaglandin F, however, will not regress developing CL that is present in the ovary during the first five days of the estrous cycle (Lauderdale, 1972). Estrus can be synchronized by shortening the luteal phase with PGF or by artificially extending it with progestins (Odde, 1990; Beal, 1998). Typical Fixed Time Artificial Insemination (FTAI) protocols use combinations of progestin and progesterone (P4) implants, oestradiol benzoate (ODB), PGF and equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG)(McGowan, 1999; Bo et al., 2003; Baruselli et al., 2004). Short-term treatment with intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing inserts (CIDR-B, InterAg, Hamilton, New Zealand) produced tight synchrony of estrus, but fertility was variable and related to duration of insert treatment (Iwazumi et al., 1994; Xu and Burton, 2000). The select synch protocol (injection of GnRH 7 d before an injection of PGF) produced estrus detection, conception, and pregnancy rates in beef heifers similar to those achieved after feeding melengestrol acetate for 14 days followed in 17 to 19 days of PGF or two injections of PGF (Stevenson et al., 1997). Generally, PGF have been used for estrus synchronization, either by themselves or in combination with progestins, estrogens, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)(Weems et al., 2006). Furthermore, PGF may enhance the effects of exogenous progesterone on the hypothalamus after progesterone withdrawal, thereby increasing pituitary responsiveness to GnRH (Randel et al., 1996) and inducing ovulation in ewes and cattle (Murdoch and McCormick., 1993).

Our objectives were to compare: 1) the ability of injection of PGF to synchronize estrus; and 2) the variability of estrual characteristics in Hanwoo cattle before their first AI (Artificial Insemination) and with their next eligible estrus preceding their second AI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

1. Synchronization Treatments and AI

Estrous cycles of all experimental animals were synchronized using a Cue-Mate (containing 1.56 g progesterone, BIONICHE, New Zealand, ES Plastics Inc.) intravaginal device for seven days and at same time by removing the cue-mate a 2.5-ml (i.m.) injection of PGF (LutalyseTM, Pfizer). Cows were inseminated using the AM/PM rule, where in a cow observed in standing estrus in the morning is inseminated in the afternoon of the same day, and a cow observed in standing estrus in the afternoon or evening is bred the following morning. Detection of estrus was done with the aid of a tail paint. It was performed four times with in a 24-hour period for 20 minutes (i.e., 6-hour intervals). All inseminations were performed by experienced technicians from commercial AI companies or by the herd owners and farm staff licensed to carry out AI. The study was conducted once in every season Spring (March∼May), Summer (Jun∼August), Autumn (September∼November) and Winter (December∼February) and in two regions, Pyeongchang-gun (one farm) and Yecheon-gun (two farm). For this study, 251 heads of Korean native cattle have been used. Pregnancy diagnosis was carried out about 60 days by uterus promotion.

2. Statistical Analysis

Differences among treatments were analyzed using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure in the Statistical Analysis System package (version 6, 12). A probability of P<0.05 was to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

In winter estrus synchronization process, 45 heads of Hanwoo cattle were treated in Pyeongchang gun and Yecheon gun. Pregnancy rates ranged from 80.0 to 100% with an average of 91.1% after the second AI (Fig. 1). On the first conception rate ranged from 53.3 to 80%, with an average of 68.8% (31/45).

Figure 1.Winter estrus synchronization treatment in accordance with the regional conception rate and pregnancy rate.

In spring, 36 heads were treated. On the first conception rate ranged from 72.7 to 86.6% with an average of 80.5% (29/36), while the second rate ranged from 90.9 to 100% with an average of 94.4% (34/ 36) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2.One pregnancy rate and repair rate concept, regional spring estrus synchronization treatment-related.

In summer, estrus synchronization treatment was done in 107 cows. On the first time of conception the rate ranged from 52.6 to 80 %, with an average of 67.2% (72/107). While on the second time it ranged from 81.5∼100% with an average of 89.7% (96/107) (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.Pregnancy rate and one of the concepts repair rate over the same period due to the summer heat treatment area.

In autumn, on the other hand, the estrus synchronization treatment was done in 63 heads (Fig. 4). After modifying the pregnancy the rate ranged from 80.9 to 100%, with an average of 90.4% (57/63). The pregnancy rate is the future research program. The results showed that regardless of elevation - high (Pyeongchang) and middle (Yecheon),- pregnancy rates would be similar in the different seasons (Fig. 5).

Figure 4.Once the area is estimated estrus synchronization treat- ment-related pregnancy rate correction.
Figure 5.One concept conception rates and repair rates, due to seasonal treatment estrus synchronization region.

Once the amendment is estimated pregnancy rate due to Pyeongchang, summer, spring season estrus, appeared in the winter of orders, once corrected conception rate estimates because of Liquan County, spring, summer and winter seasons estrus synchronization in turn, results are displayed. Generally cooling systems are widely used in dairy farms to alleviate stress caused by summer heat. However, their ability to prevent its negative effects on reproduction is limited. Moreover, hormonal treatments given alone are not efficient at improving the fertility of hyperthermic cows.

DISCUSSION

In winter estrus synchronization process, 45 heads of Hanwoo cattle were treated in Pyeongchang gun and Yecheon gun. Pregnancy rates ranged from 80.0 to 100% with an average of 91.1% after the second AI (Fig. 1). On the first conception rate ranged from 53.3 to 80%, with an average of 68.8% (31/45).

In spring, 36 heads were treated. On the first conception rate ranged from 72.7 to 86.6% with an average of 80.5% (29/36), while the second rate ranged from 90.9 to 100% with an average of 94.4% (34/ 36) (Fig. 2).

In summer, estrus synchronization treatment was done in 107 cows. On the first time of conception the rate ranged from 52.6 to 80 %, with an average of 67.2% (72/107). While on the second time it ranged from 81.5∼100% with an average of 89.7% (96/107) (Fig. 3).

In autumn, on the other hand, the estrus synchronization treatment was done in 63 heads (Fig. 4). After modifying the pregnancy the rate ranged from 80.9 to 100%, with an average of 90.4% (57/63). The pregnancy rate is the future research program. The results showed that regardless of elevation - high (Pyeongchang) and middle (Yecheon),- pregnancy rates would be similar in the different seasons (Fig. 5).

Once the amendment is estimated pregnancy rate due to Pyeongchang, summer, spring season estrus, appeared in the winter of orders, once corrected conception rate estimates because of Liquan County, spring, summer and winter seasons estrus synchronization in turn, results are displayed. Generally cooling systems are widely used in dairy farms to alleviate stress caused by summer heat. However, their ability to prevent its negative effects on reproduction is limited. Moreover, hormonal treatments given alone are not efficient at improving the fertility of hyperthermic cows.

The ability to synchronize the onset of estrus, and the time of breeding and calving correspondingly, offers potential eco nomic and management benefits to dairy farmers. It increases the rate of genetic gain through the use of artificial insemination (AI) in genetically superior sires with high-accuracy expected progeny differences, increases milk production through advan cement of the mean calving date, and reduces the percentage of non-pregnant cows at the end of the breeding season (Xu et al., 1997).

Previous studies (Byerley et al., 1987; Perry et al., 1991) have demonstrated that heifers with multiple estrous cycles before the breeding season have an increased probability of becoming pregnant. The proportion of pubertal heifers at the start of the breeding season, however, can vary dramatically across herds (Lucy et al., 2001; Lamb et al., 2006) and is influenced by numerous factors, including age, weight, body condition, and breed (Wiltbank et al., 1966; Short and Bellows, 1971; Varner et al.,1977). Several fixed-time AI (FTAI) proto cols have been developed for beef heifers. FTAI pregnancy rates were similar between protocols. Although FTAI pregnancy rates were reduced in prepubertal heifers, within this subset of females the protocols of shorter duration (5dCO and PG-6d-CIDR) were as effective in prepubertal heifers as the longer protocol (14dCIDR-PG). This suggests an extended period of progesterone exposure is not required to effectively synchronize ovulation in prepubertal heifers(Bridges et al., 2014).

CONCLUSION

In summary, we suggest summer reproductive management to alleviate the effects of heat stress. It should be based on intensive cooling combined with hormonal treatment. Given that different subgroups of cows benefit differently from the treatments, selective hormonal administration should be considered.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Winter estrus synchronization treatment in accordance with the regional conception rate and pregnancy rate.
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2014; 29: 321-325https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.4.321

Fig 2.

Figure 2.One pregnancy rate and repair rate concept, regional spring estrus synchronization treatment-related.
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2014; 29: 321-325https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.4.321

Fig 3.

Figure 3.Pregnancy rate and one of the concepts repair rate over the same period due to the summer heat treatment area.
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2014; 29: 321-325https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.4.321

Fig 4.

Figure 4.Once the area is estimated estrus synchronization treat- ment-related pregnancy rate correction.
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2014; 29: 321-325https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.4.321

Fig 5.

Figure 5.One concept conception rates and repair rates, due to seasonal treatment estrus synchronization region.
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2014; 29: 321-325https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.4.321

References

  1. Baruselli PS, Reis EL, Marques MO, Nasser LF, Bo GA. 2004. The use of hormonal treatments to improve reproductive performance of anestrous beef cattle in tropical climates. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 82:479-486.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Beal WE, Chenault JR Day ML, Corah LR. 1988. Variation in conception rates following synchronization of estrus with melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F. J. Anim. Sci. 66:599-602.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  3. Bo GA, Baruselli PS, Martinez MF. 2003. Pattern and manipulation of follicular development in Bos indicus cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 78:307-326.
    CrossRef
  4. Bridges GA, Lake SL, Kruse SG, Bird SL, Funnell BJ, Arias R, Walker JA, Grant JK, Perry GA. 2014. Comparison of three CIDR-based fixed-time AI protocols in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 92:3127-3133.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Byerley DJ, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG, Short RE. 1987. Pregnancy rates of beef heifers bred either on puberal or third estrus. J. Anim. Sci. 65:645-650.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  6. Iwazumi YY, Fukui RB, Vargas C, Nakano N, Sato M, Furudate K, Ohsaki S, Matsuzaki S. 1994. Superovulation using CIDR in Holstein cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 40:259-266.
    CrossRef
  7. Lamb GC, Larson JE, Geary TW, Stevenson JS, Johnson SK, Day ML, Ansotegui RP, Kesler DJ, DeJarnette MJ, Landblom DG. 2006. Synchronization of estrus and artificial insemination in replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2 alpha, and progesterone. J. Anim. Sci. 84:3000-3009.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Larson LL and Ball PJH. 1992. Regulation of estrous cycles in dairy cattle: a review. Theriogenology 38:255-267.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Lauderdale JW. 1972. Effects of PGF injection on pregnancy and estrous cycle of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 35:246.
  10. Lauderdale JW, Seguin BE, Stellflug JN, Chenault JR, Thatcher WW, Vincent CK, Loyancano AF. 1974. Fertility of cattle following PGF injection. J. Anim. Sci. 38:964-967.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Lucy MC, Billings HJ, Butler WR, Ehnis LR, Fields MJ, Kesler DJ, Kinder JE, Mattos RC, Short RE, Thatcher WW, Wettemann RP, Yelich JV, Hafs HD. 2001. Efficacy of an intravaginal progesterone insert and an injection of PGF-2alpha for synchronizing estrus and shortening the interval to pregnancy in postpartum beef cows, peripubertal beef heifers, and dairy heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 79:982-995.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. McGowan MR. 1999. Oestrus synchronization and time breeding programmes in Bos indicus and Bos indicus derived cattle. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposia on Animal Reproduction. Argentina, Cordoba, pp. 71-82.
  13. Murdoch WJ and McCormick RJ. 1993. Mechanisms and physiological implications of leucocyte chemoattraction into periovulatory ovine follicles. J. Reprod. Fertil. 97:375-380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  14. Odde KG. 1990. A review of synchronization of estrus in post-partum cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:817-830.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  15. Patterson DJ, Kiracofe GH, Stevenson JS, Corah LR. 1989. Control of the bovine estrous cycle with melengestrol acetate (MGA): A review. J. Anim. Sci. 67:1895-1906.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Perry RC, Corah L, Cochran RC, Brethour J, Olson KS, Higgins JJ. 1991. Effects of hay quality, breed, and ovarian development on onset of puberty and reproductive performance of beef heifers. J. Prod. Agric. 4:13-18.
    CrossRef
  17. Randel RD, Lammoglia MA, Lewis AW, Neuendorff DA, Guthrie MJ. 1996. Exogenous PGF(2)alpha enhanced GnRH-induced LH release in postpartum cows. Theriogenology. 45:643-54.
    CrossRef
  18. Short RE and Bellows RA. 1971. Relationship among weight gains, age at puberty and reproductive performance in heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 32:127-131.
    CrossRef
  19. Stevenson JS, Hoffman DP, Nichols DA, McKee RM, Krehbiel CL. 1997. Fertility in estrus-cycling and noncycling virgin heifers and suckled beef cows after induced ovulation. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1343-1350.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Varner LW, Bellows RA, Christensen DS. 1977. A management system for wintering replacement heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 44:165-171.
    CrossRef
  21. Weems CW, Weems YS, Randel RD. 2006. Prostaglandins and reproduction in female farm animals. Vet. J. 171:206-8.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. Wiltbank JN, Gregor KE, Swinger LA, Ingalls JE, Rothlisberger JA, Koch RM. 1966. Effects of heterosis on age and weight at puberty in beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 25:744-751.
    CrossRef
  23. Xu ZZ, Burton LJ, Macmillan KL. 1997. Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows following estrus synchronization regimens with PGF and progesterone. Theriogenology 47:687-701.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Xu, ZZ, Burton LJ. 2000. Estrus synchronization of lactating dairy cows with GnRH, progesterone, and prostaglandin F. J. Dairy Sci. 83:471-476.
    Pubmed CrossRef

JARB Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotehnology

qr code

OPEN ACCESS pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663