Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2020; 35(3): 215-222
Published online September 30, 2020
https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.3.215
Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.
Ryounghoon Jeon1,2 and Gyu-Jin Rho1,*
1College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Correspondence to: Gyu-Jin Rho
E-mail: jinrho@gnu.ac.kr
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6264-0017
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been widely used as donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) to increase the efficiency of embryo cloning. Since replicative senescence reduces the efficiency of embryo cloning in MSCs during in vitro expansion, transfection of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) into MSCs has been used to suppress the replicative senescence. Here, TERT-transfected MSCs in comparison with early passage MSCs (eMSCs) and sham-transfected MSCs (sMSCs) were used to evaluate the effects of embryo cloning with SCNT in a porcine model. Cloned embryos from tMSC, eMSC, and sMSC groups were indistinguishable in their fusion rate, cleavage rate, total cell number, and gene expression levels of OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG during the blastocyst stage. The blastocyst formation rates of tMSC and sMSC groups were comparable but significantly lower than that of the eMSC group (p < 0.05). In contrast, tMSC and eMSC groups demonstrated significantly reduced apoptotic incidence (p < 0.05), and decreased BAX but increased BCL2 expression in the blastocyst stage compared to the sMSC group (p < 0.05). Therefore, MSCs transfected with telomerase reverse transcriptase do not affect the overall development of the cloned embryos in porcine SCNT, but enables to maintain embryo quality, similar to apoptotic events in SCNT embryos typically achieved by an early passage MSC. This finding offers a bioengineering strategy in improving the porcine cloned embryo quality.
Keywords: apoptosis, mesenchymal stem cell, porcine, somatic cell nuclear transfer, telomerase reverse transcriptase
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is an essential technique in biomedical research for the production of transgenic animals, conservation of endangered species, and establishment of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) (Lee et al., 2014). SCNT has been used to clone diverse animals such as pigs, mice, cattle, and non-human primates (Gouveia et al., 2020). Since pigs are not only favored for mass production but also due to their anatomical and physiological similarities to humans, for the establishment of disease models, production of bio-organs, and development of new drug biotechnologies, they have been considered a highly valuable animal species in the field of animal cloning (Jeon et al., 2020). However, the cloning efficiency of pigs using SCNT is still relatively low in comparison to the high demand for cloned pigs in biomedical research. To overcome this, studies have aimed to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying each stage of cloning such as donor cell manipulation,
In particular, the method of donor cell manipulation including the use of various cell types and transfected cells is a very efficient method as it does not affect the existing SCNT system. The donor cell used for SCNT takes advantage of the ability of the ooplasm to archive reprogramming and development into an embryo. However, since the reprogramming ability of the ooplasm is limited, researchers have attempted to use undifferentiated stem cells as donor cells which could be advantageous for successful reprogramming (Meissner and Jaenisch, 2006). However, stem cells such as ESCs or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in a highly undifferentiated status show high proliferation rate making it difficult to synchronize recipient oocytes and donor cell cycles (Yuan et al., 2014). Further, expensive supplements such as leukemia inhibitory factor and basic fibroblast growth factor and extensive efforts are required to produce and maintain pluripotent stem cells which is often unpractical. On the contrary, the isolation and culture methods for MSCs are simple and easy, allowing the resources to focus on embryo manipulation (Lee et al., 2014). To select transfected cells or to secure large quantities of identical donor cells, long-term
To overcome the proliferation limit and/or to revert MSC aging, various studies have been conducted on the manipulation of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), p53, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (
Therefore, this study was carried out to reveal the characteristics of porcine cloned embryos using tMSCs as donor cells compared to early passage MSCs (eMSCs) and sham-transfected MSCs (sMSCs). For the evaluation of embryos, fusion, cleavage, and blastocyst formation rates and the total cell number, apoptosis incidence, and expression level of early transcription factors and apoptosis-regulating genes in blastocyst stages were analyzed.
All animal handling and experiments in this study were performed under guidance of the Research Ethics Committee of Gyeongsang National University Animal Center for Biomedical Experimentation (GNU-130308-P0022).
Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals and media were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Bone marrow extracts were collected from 2-month-old male miniature pigs and MSC progenitors were isolated using density gradient centrifugation as previously described (Jeon et al., 2019). MSC progenitors were seeded into 6-well plates with advanced Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% GlutaMax, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. MSC progenitors were incubated at 38℃ with 5% CO2. The culture medium was changed every 2 days. When MSCs reached 70-80% confluence, cells were digested using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA and passaged at a 1:4 ratio. Passage 2 MSCs were transfected with pBabe-hygro-hTERT (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA) and pBabe-hygro (Addgene) for the transfection of hTERT and control (sham), respectively, using electroporation (Neon, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, transfected MSCs were selected using 200 μg/mL Hygromycin B. TERT-transfected MSCs (tMSCs), early passage (passage 3-5) MSCs (eMSCs), and sham-transfected MSCs (sMSCs) were used as donors for cloning.
Ovaries were collected from pre-pubertal pigs at a local slaughterhouse. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated from 3-6 mm (diameter) follicles using an 18-gauge needle attached to a vacuum. COCs with uniform ooplasm and multilayered cumulus cells were used for
Production of cloned embryos was performed using a previously described protocol with minor modifications (Jeon et al., 2012). Oocytes in the metaphase II stage were enucleated by aspirating PB1 and a small volume of adjacent ooplasm in HEPES-buffered TCM199 supplemented with 7.5 μg/mL cytochalasin B (CCB), 0.3% bovine serum albumin, and 12 mM sorbitol. Enucleation was confirmed by staining with 0.5 μg/mL Hoechst-33342 for 2 min at room temperature and examining cells under a fluorescence microscope. Donor cells were transferred into the perivitelline space of the enucleated oocyte. Oocyte-donor cell couplets were fused and activated simultaneously with two simultaneous DC pulses of 1.8 KV/cm for 30 μsec using an BTX Electro Square porator (ECM 830, BTX, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in 0.28 M mannitol solution containing 0.1 mM MgSO4, 0.05 mM CaCl2, and 0.01% BSA. Couplets were cultured in porcine zygote medium 5 (PZM5) supplemented with 7.5 μg/mL CCB for 3 h in PZM5 at 38.5℃ in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Fused eggs were selected and further cultured in PZM5 without CCB. Cleavage rate and blastocysts formation rate were evaluated on Day 2 and 7, respectively.
Total cell number and incidence of apoptotic body formation of blastocysts were evaluated using the TUNEL assay (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Roche, Germany) using a previously described protocol (Jeon et al., 2012). Briefly, on day 7, blastocysts were fixed overnight in 4% formaldehyde at 4℃, then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate buffer for 1 h. Blastocysts were incubated in the TUNEL reaction cocktail at 37℃ for 1 h in the dark, and further incubated with RNase A (50 μg/mL) for 1 h, followed by counterstaining with propidium iodide (50 μg/mL) for 1 h. Blastocysts were mounted using VECTASHIELD (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) medium and examined under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Ti-U, Japan).
Gene expression analysis was performed with minor modifications to a previously described protocol (Lee et al., 2017). Briefly, total RNA was extracted from pools (five replicates) of three blastocysts using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and residual genomic DNA was removed through RNase Free DNase (Qiagen) treatment for 15 min in room temperature. Since a low amount of total RNA was extracted from the 3 blastocysts which was below the usable concentration range of the UV spectrophotometer, RNA could not be quantified. The RNA was converted to cDNA using the Sensiscript Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out on a Rotor Gene Q qRT-PCR instrument (Qiagen) with RT2 SYBR Green ROX qPCR Mastermix (Qiagen) combined with 2 μL of cDNA and 0.5 μM forward and reverse primers (Table 1). Amplification was carried out using the following conditions: 95℃ for 10 min; 40 cycles at 95℃ for 15 s and 60℃ for 60 s; 60℃ to 95℃ at 1℃/s; 40℃ for 30 s. Ct values were analyzed using the Rotor-Gene Q Series Software (Qiagen) and
Table 1 . Primer sequence for gene expression analysis
Gene | Sequence 5’-3’ | Amplicon size (bp) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
F: AGTCCCAGGACATCAAAGCG | 129 | NM_001113060.1 | |
F: AGGACCAGCTGGGCTATCCG | 170 | NM_001123197.1 | |
F: AACCAAACCTGGAACAGCCAGAC | 152 | NM_001129971.1 | |
F: CTCCTGGCTGTCTCTGAAGG | 95 | AJ606301.1 | |
F: AAGCGCATTGGAGATGAACT | 147 | XM_003121700.2 | |
F: CACACGCTTTCCTATGTCGATG | 94 | XM 003362140.1 |
Differences between groups were evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by the Games-Howell post-hoc test using Prism 7 (GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean, and
A total of 217, 204, and 233 cloned embryos were produced using tMSCs, eMSCs, and sMSCs as donor cells, respectively. Cloned embryos were used for subsequent analysis (Table 2). The fusion rate and cleavage rate of tMSC, eMSC, and sMSC groups did not differ. The blastocyst rate of the tMSC group did not differ from the sMSC group, however, the blastocyst rates of the tMSC group and sMSC group were significantly lower than eMSC group (
Table 2 . Fusion rate and developmental potential of porcine embryos cloned with tMSCs, eMSCs and sMSCs
Embryo groups | Oocytes used | mean% ± SEM (no. of embryos) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fusion | Cleavage | Blastocyst | ||
tMSC | 217 | 94.0 ± 1.5 (204) | 77.5 ± 1.8 (168) | 13.8 ± 0.4 (30) |
eMSC | 204 | 94.7 ± 1.2 (193) | 78.1 ± 1.0 (159) | 15.7 ± 0.3 (32)* |
sMSC | 233 | 92.7 ± 1.3 (216) | 76.6 ± 2.3 (179) | 12.6 ± 1.2 (29) |
Embryo groups: tMSC, embryos cloned with telomerase reverse trancriptase-transfected MSCs; sMSC, embryos cloned with sham-transfected MSCs; eMSC, embryos cloned with early passage MSCs. Asterisk indicates significant difference (
The total cell number and the apoptotic incidence were analyzed for evaluation of the embryo quality in the blastocyst stage (Fig. 1A). The total cell numbers of the tMSC, eMSC, and sMSC groups were not statistically different (Fig. 1B). The apoptotic incidence of the tMSC and eMSC groups was similar, however, significantly lower than that of sMSC group (
Apoptosis-related genes and early transcription factors were selected for the evaluation of essential gene expressions during blastocyst stage. In relation to apoptosis,
This study was conducted to reveal the effect of using TERT-transfected MSCs as donor cells on porcine cloned embryos. The cloned embryos using TERT-transfected MSCs were not changed in their fusion rate, cleavage rate, and total cell number as well as in their expression of pluripotent genes including
Fusion of donor cell with oocyte membrane in SCNT is a necessary process for transferred DNA to be exposed to the ooplasm. This process is greatly affected by the donor cell membrane characteristics along with the electric field conditions (Daniel et al., 2008). In this study, the fusion rate did not differ according to the type of donor cells. This may be because there is no strong association between the cellular function of TERT and the synthesis as well as maintenance of proteins and lipids constituting the cell membrane (Hiyama and Hiyama, 2007). However, although there was no significant difference in fusion rate among the tMSC, sMSC, and eMSC groups, the fusion rate of the sMSC group was lower than that of tMSC and eMSC groups. This pattern was probably due to altered membrane properties resulting from enlarged cell size from replicative senescence or the accumulation of oxidative stress due to long-term
In terms of developmental rate, the cleavage rate was not affected by TERT transfection or replicative senescence. This was similar to the results from our previous study which showed that there was no difference in cloned embryos using MSCs of different aging levels as donors or cloned embryos using
The total cell number, apoptotic incidence, and expression of early transcription factors in the blastocyst stage are important criteria for evaluating embryo quality because they affect the ratio of the inner cell mass to the trophectoderm as well as embryo development during post-implantation stages (Ock et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2019). In this study, the total cell number and gene expression of early transcription factors such as
In conclusion, the present study revealed that using TERT-transfected MSCs as a donor cell for SCNT reduces apoptosis induced by replicative senescence of donor cells. This result will be useful in establishing a strategy for securing large quantities of high-quality donor cells for SCNT and improving the quality of cloned pigs.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Conceptualization: RJ, GJR
Data curation: RJ
Formal analysis: RJ
Funding acquisition: GJR
Investigation: RJ, GJR
Methodology: RJ, GJR
Project administration: GJR
Resources: GJR
Software: RJ
Supervision: GJR
Validation: RJ, GJR
Visualization: RJ
Writing - original draft: RJ
Writing - review & editing: GJR
R Jeon, Researcher, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3174-1197
GJ Rho, Professor, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6264-0017
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2020; 35(3): 215-222
Published online September 30, 2020 https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.35.3.215
Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.
Ryounghoon Jeon1,2 and Gyu-Jin Rho1,*
1College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 52828, Korea
2Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
Correspondence to:Gyu-Jin Rho
E-mail: jinrho@gnu.ac.kr
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6264-0017
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been widely used as donor cells for somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) to increase the efficiency of embryo cloning. Since replicative senescence reduces the efficiency of embryo cloning in MSCs during in vitro expansion, transfection of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) into MSCs has been used to suppress the replicative senescence. Here, TERT-transfected MSCs in comparison with early passage MSCs (eMSCs) and sham-transfected MSCs (sMSCs) were used to evaluate the effects of embryo cloning with SCNT in a porcine model. Cloned embryos from tMSC, eMSC, and sMSC groups were indistinguishable in their fusion rate, cleavage rate, total cell number, and gene expression levels of OCT4, SOX2 and NANOG during the blastocyst stage. The blastocyst formation rates of tMSC and sMSC groups were comparable but significantly lower than that of the eMSC group (p < 0.05). In contrast, tMSC and eMSC groups demonstrated significantly reduced apoptotic incidence (p < 0.05), and decreased BAX but increased BCL2 expression in the blastocyst stage compared to the sMSC group (p < 0.05). Therefore, MSCs transfected with telomerase reverse transcriptase do not affect the overall development of the cloned embryos in porcine SCNT, but enables to maintain embryo quality, similar to apoptotic events in SCNT embryos typically achieved by an early passage MSC. This finding offers a bioengineering strategy in improving the porcine cloned embryo quality.
Keywords: apoptosis, mesenchymal stem cell, porcine, somatic cell nuclear transfer, telomerase reverse transcriptase
Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is an essential technique in biomedical research for the production of transgenic animals, conservation of endangered species, and establishment of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) (Lee et al., 2014). SCNT has been used to clone diverse animals such as pigs, mice, cattle, and non-human primates (Gouveia et al., 2020). Since pigs are not only favored for mass production but also due to their anatomical and physiological similarities to humans, for the establishment of disease models, production of bio-organs, and development of new drug biotechnologies, they have been considered a highly valuable animal species in the field of animal cloning (Jeon et al., 2020). However, the cloning efficiency of pigs using SCNT is still relatively low in comparison to the high demand for cloned pigs in biomedical research. To overcome this, studies have aimed to reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying each stage of cloning such as donor cell manipulation,
In particular, the method of donor cell manipulation including the use of various cell types and transfected cells is a very efficient method as it does not affect the existing SCNT system. The donor cell used for SCNT takes advantage of the ability of the ooplasm to archive reprogramming and development into an embryo. However, since the reprogramming ability of the ooplasm is limited, researchers have attempted to use undifferentiated stem cells as donor cells which could be advantageous for successful reprogramming (Meissner and Jaenisch, 2006). However, stem cells such as ESCs or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in a highly undifferentiated status show high proliferation rate making it difficult to synchronize recipient oocytes and donor cell cycles (Yuan et al., 2014). Further, expensive supplements such as leukemia inhibitory factor and basic fibroblast growth factor and extensive efforts are required to produce and maintain pluripotent stem cells which is often unpractical. On the contrary, the isolation and culture methods for MSCs are simple and easy, allowing the resources to focus on embryo manipulation (Lee et al., 2014). To select transfected cells or to secure large quantities of identical donor cells, long-term
To overcome the proliferation limit and/or to revert MSC aging, various studies have been conducted on the manipulation of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), p53, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (
Therefore, this study was carried out to reveal the characteristics of porcine cloned embryos using tMSCs as donor cells compared to early passage MSCs (eMSCs) and sham-transfected MSCs (sMSCs). For the evaluation of embryos, fusion, cleavage, and blastocyst formation rates and the total cell number, apoptosis incidence, and expression level of early transcription factors and apoptosis-regulating genes in blastocyst stages were analyzed.
All animal handling and experiments in this study were performed under guidance of the Research Ethics Committee of Gyeongsang National University Animal Center for Biomedical Experimentation (GNU-130308-P0022).
Unless otherwise stated, all chemicals and media were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Bone marrow extracts were collected from 2-month-old male miniature pigs and MSC progenitors were isolated using density gradient centrifugation as previously described (Jeon et al., 2019). MSC progenitors were seeded into 6-well plates with advanced Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% GlutaMax, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. MSC progenitors were incubated at 38℃ with 5% CO2. The culture medium was changed every 2 days. When MSCs reached 70-80% confluence, cells were digested using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA and passaged at a 1:4 ratio. Passage 2 MSCs were transfected with pBabe-hygro-hTERT (Addgene, Watertown, MA, USA) and pBabe-hygro (Addgene) for the transfection of hTERT and control (sham), respectively, using electroporation (Neon, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, transfected MSCs were selected using 200 μg/mL Hygromycin B. TERT-transfected MSCs (tMSCs), early passage (passage 3-5) MSCs (eMSCs), and sham-transfected MSCs (sMSCs) were used as donors for cloning.
Ovaries were collected from pre-pubertal pigs at a local slaughterhouse. Cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were aspirated from 3-6 mm (diameter) follicles using an 18-gauge needle attached to a vacuum. COCs with uniform ooplasm and multilayered cumulus cells were used for
Production of cloned embryos was performed using a previously described protocol with minor modifications (Jeon et al., 2012). Oocytes in the metaphase II stage were enucleated by aspirating PB1 and a small volume of adjacent ooplasm in HEPES-buffered TCM199 supplemented with 7.5 μg/mL cytochalasin B (CCB), 0.3% bovine serum albumin, and 12 mM sorbitol. Enucleation was confirmed by staining with 0.5 μg/mL Hoechst-33342 for 2 min at room temperature and examining cells under a fluorescence microscope. Donor cells were transferred into the perivitelline space of the enucleated oocyte. Oocyte-donor cell couplets were fused and activated simultaneously with two simultaneous DC pulses of 1.8 KV/cm for 30 μsec using an BTX Electro Square porator (ECM 830, BTX, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) in 0.28 M mannitol solution containing 0.1 mM MgSO4, 0.05 mM CaCl2, and 0.01% BSA. Couplets were cultured in porcine zygote medium 5 (PZM5) supplemented with 7.5 μg/mL CCB for 3 h in PZM5 at 38.5℃ in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in air. Fused eggs were selected and further cultured in PZM5 without CCB. Cleavage rate and blastocysts formation rate were evaluated on Day 2 and 7, respectively.
Total cell number and incidence of apoptotic body formation of blastocysts were evaluated using the TUNEL assay (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, Roche, Germany) using a previously described protocol (Jeon et al., 2012). Briefly, on day 7, blastocysts were fixed overnight in 4% formaldehyde at 4℃, then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in 0.1% sodium citrate buffer for 1 h. Blastocysts were incubated in the TUNEL reaction cocktail at 37℃ for 1 h in the dark, and further incubated with RNase A (50 μg/mL) for 1 h, followed by counterstaining with propidium iodide (50 μg/mL) for 1 h. Blastocysts were mounted using VECTASHIELD (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) medium and examined under a fluorescence microscope (Nikon Ti-U, Japan).
Gene expression analysis was performed with minor modifications to a previously described protocol (Lee et al., 2017). Briefly, total RNA was extracted from pools (five replicates) of three blastocysts using the RNeasy Micro Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and residual genomic DNA was removed through RNase Free DNase (Qiagen) treatment for 15 min in room temperature. Since a low amount of total RNA was extracted from the 3 blastocysts which was below the usable concentration range of the UV spectrophotometer, RNA could not be quantified. The RNA was converted to cDNA using the Sensiscript Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). Quantitative RT-PCR was carried out on a Rotor Gene Q qRT-PCR instrument (Qiagen) with RT2 SYBR Green ROX qPCR Mastermix (Qiagen) combined with 2 μL of cDNA and 0.5 μM forward and reverse primers (Table 1). Amplification was carried out using the following conditions: 95℃ for 10 min; 40 cycles at 95℃ for 15 s and 60℃ for 60 s; 60℃ to 95℃ at 1℃/s; 40℃ for 30 s. Ct values were analyzed using the Rotor-Gene Q Series Software (Qiagen) and
Table 1. Primer sequence for gene expression analysis.
Gene | Sequence 5’-3’ | Amplicon size (bp) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
F: AGTCCCAGGACATCAAAGCG | 129 | NM_001113060.1 | |
F: AGGACCAGCTGGGCTATCCG | 170 | NM_001123197.1 | |
F: AACCAAACCTGGAACAGCCAGAC | 152 | NM_001129971.1 | |
F: CTCCTGGCTGTCTCTGAAGG | 95 | AJ606301.1 | |
F: AAGCGCATTGGAGATGAACT | 147 | XM_003121700.2 | |
F: CACACGCTTTCCTATGTCGATG | 94 | XM 003362140.1 |
Differences between groups were evaluated using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by the Games-Howell post-hoc test using Prism 7 (GraphPad Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean, and
A total of 217, 204, and 233 cloned embryos were produced using tMSCs, eMSCs, and sMSCs as donor cells, respectively. Cloned embryos were used for subsequent analysis (Table 2). The fusion rate and cleavage rate of tMSC, eMSC, and sMSC groups did not differ. The blastocyst rate of the tMSC group did not differ from the sMSC group, however, the blastocyst rates of the tMSC group and sMSC group were significantly lower than eMSC group (
Table 2. Fusion rate and developmental potential of porcine embryos cloned with tMSCs, eMSCs and sMSCs.
Embryo groups | Oocytes used | mean% ± SEM (no. of embryos) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fusion | Cleavage | Blastocyst | ||
tMSC | 217 | 94.0 ± 1.5 (204) | 77.5 ± 1.8 (168) | 13.8 ± 0.4 (30) |
eMSC | 204 | 94.7 ± 1.2 (193) | 78.1 ± 1.0 (159) | 15.7 ± 0.3 (32)* |
sMSC | 233 | 92.7 ± 1.3 (216) | 76.6 ± 2.3 (179) | 12.6 ± 1.2 (29) |
Embryo groups: tMSC, embryos cloned with telomerase reverse trancriptase-transfected MSCs; sMSC, embryos cloned with sham-transfected MSCs; eMSC, embryos cloned with early passage MSCs. Asterisk indicates significant difference (
The total cell number and the apoptotic incidence were analyzed for evaluation of the embryo quality in the blastocyst stage (Fig. 1A). The total cell numbers of the tMSC, eMSC, and sMSC groups were not statistically different (Fig. 1B). The apoptotic incidence of the tMSC and eMSC groups was similar, however, significantly lower than that of sMSC group (
Apoptosis-related genes and early transcription factors were selected for the evaluation of essential gene expressions during blastocyst stage. In relation to apoptosis,
This study was conducted to reveal the effect of using TERT-transfected MSCs as donor cells on porcine cloned embryos. The cloned embryos using TERT-transfected MSCs were not changed in their fusion rate, cleavage rate, and total cell number as well as in their expression of pluripotent genes including
Fusion of donor cell with oocyte membrane in SCNT is a necessary process for transferred DNA to be exposed to the ooplasm. This process is greatly affected by the donor cell membrane characteristics along with the electric field conditions (Daniel et al., 2008). In this study, the fusion rate did not differ according to the type of donor cells. This may be because there is no strong association between the cellular function of TERT and the synthesis as well as maintenance of proteins and lipids constituting the cell membrane (Hiyama and Hiyama, 2007). However, although there was no significant difference in fusion rate among the tMSC, sMSC, and eMSC groups, the fusion rate of the sMSC group was lower than that of tMSC and eMSC groups. This pattern was probably due to altered membrane properties resulting from enlarged cell size from replicative senescence or the accumulation of oxidative stress due to long-term
In terms of developmental rate, the cleavage rate was not affected by TERT transfection or replicative senescence. This was similar to the results from our previous study which showed that there was no difference in cloned embryos using MSCs of different aging levels as donors or cloned embryos using
The total cell number, apoptotic incidence, and expression of early transcription factors in the blastocyst stage are important criteria for evaluating embryo quality because they affect the ratio of the inner cell mass to the trophectoderm as well as embryo development during post-implantation stages (Ock et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2019). In this study, the total cell number and gene expression of early transcription factors such as
In conclusion, the present study revealed that using TERT-transfected MSCs as a donor cell for SCNT reduces apoptosis induced by replicative senescence of donor cells. This result will be useful in establishing a strategy for securing large quantities of high-quality donor cells for SCNT and improving the quality of cloned pigs.
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Conceptualization: RJ, GJR
Data curation: RJ
Formal analysis: RJ
Funding acquisition: GJR
Investigation: RJ, GJR
Methodology: RJ, GJR
Project administration: GJR
Resources: GJR
Software: RJ
Supervision: GJR
Validation: RJ, GJR
Visualization: RJ
Writing - original draft: RJ
Writing - review & editing: GJR
R Jeon, Researcher, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3174-1197
GJ Rho, Professor, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6264-0017
Table 1 . Primer sequence for gene expression analysis.
Gene | Sequence 5’-3’ | Amplicon size (bp) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|
F: AGTCCCAGGACATCAAAGCG | 129 | NM_001113060.1 | |
F: AGGACCAGCTGGGCTATCCG | 170 | NM_001123197.1 | |
F: AACCAAACCTGGAACAGCCAGAC | 152 | NM_001129971.1 | |
F: CTCCTGGCTGTCTCTGAAGG | 95 | AJ606301.1 | |
F: AAGCGCATTGGAGATGAACT | 147 | XM_003121700.2 | |
F: CACACGCTTTCCTATGTCGATG | 94 | XM 003362140.1 |
Table 2 . Fusion rate and developmental potential of porcine embryos cloned with tMSCs, eMSCs and sMSCs.
Embryo groups | Oocytes used | mean% ± SEM (no. of embryos) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fusion | Cleavage | Blastocyst | ||
tMSC | 217 | 94.0 ± 1.5 (204) | 77.5 ± 1.8 (168) | 13.8 ± 0.4 (30) |
eMSC | 204 | 94.7 ± 1.2 (193) | 78.1 ± 1.0 (159) | 15.7 ± 0.3 (32)* |
sMSC | 233 | 92.7 ± 1.3 (216) | 76.6 ± 2.3 (179) | 12.6 ± 1.2 (29) |
Embryo groups: tMSC, embryos cloned with telomerase reverse trancriptase-transfected MSCs; sMSC, embryos cloned with sham-transfected MSCs; eMSC, embryos cloned with early passage MSCs. Asterisk indicates significant difference (
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663