JARB Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotehnology

OPEN ACCESS pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663

Article Search

Original Article

Article Original Article
Split Viewer

Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2024; 39(4): 221-232

Published online December 31, 2024

https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.39.4.221

Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.

Differential expression of circulating microRNAs in lactating Holstein and Jersey cows exposed to heat stress

Jihwan Lee1 , Doosan Kim1 , Byeonghwi Lim2 , Gyeonglim Ryu1 , Hyeonguk Baek1 , Joohwan Kim3 , Seungmin Ha4 , Sangbum Kim1 , Seunghwan Lee5,* , Taejeong Choi1,* and Inchul Choi5,*

1Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea
2Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
3Dairy Biotechnology R&D Center, Seoul Milk Cooperation, Yangpyeong 12528, Korea
4Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Hamyang 50000, Korea
5Division of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea

Correspondence to: Taejeong Choi
E-mail: choi6695@korea.kr

Inchul Choi
E-mail: icchoi@cnu.ac.kr

Seunghwan Lee
E-mail: slee46@cnu.ac.kr

Received: October 3, 2024; Revised: November 26, 2024; Accepted: November 26, 2024

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background: South Korea has recently faced record-high temperatures, which have adversely affected dairy production. Holstein cows, the primary dairy breed globally, are particularly sensitive to heat stress. In contrast, Jersey cows have shown greater heat tolerance, as demonstrated by phenotypic studies.
Methods: We investigated physiological and molecular responses to heat stress in Holstein and Jersey cows by measuring rectal temperature, milk yield, and average daily gain, confirming Holstein cows’ greater vulnerability. To explore molecular mechanisms, we analyzed circulating microRNA profiles from whole blood samples collected under heat stress and normal conditions using microRNA-sequencing. Differential expression patterns were compared between the two breeds to identify biological pathways associated with heat stress.
Results: Four microRNAs (bta-miR-20b, bta-miR-1246, bta-miR-2284x, and bta-miR- 2284y) were significantly differentially expressed in both breeds under heat stress (|FC| ≥ 2, p < 0.05). Notably, bta-miR-20b and bta-miR-1246 were linked to corpus luteum function and progesterone biosynthesis, while bta-miR-2284x and bta-miR- 2284y were associated with immune responses. A comparison of 11 potential heat stress-related microRNAs identified in previous studies of Holstein cows revealed consistent expression trends in Jersey cows, albeit with lower fold changes, suggesting their superior heat resilience.
Conclusions: Our study highlights the physiological and microRNA-based differences in heat stress responses between Holstein and Jersey cows. Jersey cows exhibited greater resilience, supported by more stable microRNA expression profiles and improved heat stress indicators, making them a promising breed for dairy production in increasingly hot climates.

Keywords: circulating microRNA, heat stress, Holstein, Jersey, lactation

In the summer of 2024, South Korea recorded its highest average temperature (25.6℃) since nationwide weather observation began in 1973 (KTimes, 2024). Additionally, the national average number of tropical nights reached 20.2 days, more than three times the normal level (KTimes, 2024). The highest temperature since meteorological observations began in 1907 (over 40℃) was recorded relatively recently, in 2018 (Lee et al., 2020).

Holstein-Friesian breed is the most common dairy cattle breed worldwide, but it is highly susceptible to heat, which leads to reduced milk production and decreased reproductive performance under heat stress (HS) conditions, ultimately lowering farmers’ economic income (Wolfenson and Roth, 2018; Tao et al., 2019). In the case of Holstein cows, milk production decreases by 30-40% under HS conditions compared to normal conditions (West, 1999; Baumgard et al., 2012; Pragna et al., 2017). Particularly, the conception rate of Holstein cows is 39.4 % at a temperature-humidity index (THI) below 72 (non-HS conditions), but it decreases to 31.6 % when THI exceeds 78.0 (intermediate HS) (Liu et al., 2018). In Florida, conception rates for lactating cows during the summer are particularly low, at only 13.5 % (Putney et al., 1989). This reduction in conception rates may be attributed to hormonal changes during the summer, such as decreases in E2 and LH levels (Wolfenson and Roth, 2018; Roth, 2020). Nebel et al. (1997) reported that the number of mounts per estrus also decreased by nearly half in the summer compared to the winter (Nebel et al., 1997; Hansen, 2019).

Jersey breed, the second most common dairy breed worldwide, is relatively known for its heat tolerance (Wiggans, 2000; CDCB, 2020). In South Korea, Jersey cattle embryos have been imported from Canada and the United States since 2012, with the aim of improving milk fat and protein content in dairy products, as well as addressing climate change to promote the sustainability of dairy farming (Lee et al., 2023). Notably, under HS conditions with a THI exceeding 68, one study reported that the average daily milk yield of Holstein cows decreased from 35.6 kg to 34.2 kg, whereas Jersey cows showed an increase in milk yield from 25.9 kg to 26.6 kg (Smith et al., 2013). Similarly, in Hungary, it was observed that milk production in Holstein cows decreased in summer compared to spring, while Jersey cows showed similar milk production levels between the two seasons (Jurkovich et al., 2023). Moreover, in terms of reproductive performance, the conception rate of Jersey cattle was inherently higher than that of Holstein cattle (Norman et al., 2009; Norman et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2023). Although the conception rates of both breeds declined sharply when the THI exceeded 75, the decrease was more pronounced in Holstein cows compared to Jersey cows (Lee et al., 2023).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small endogenous RNA molecules, typically 18 to 22 nucleotides in length, that function as non-coding RNAs. They play a key role in RNA silencing and are involved in various developmental and pathological processes in animals by regulating numerous protein-coding transcripts (Kim and Nam, 2006; Kim et al., 2009; Ha and Kim, 2014). Recent studies have shown that miRNAs are exporting to the extracellular environment through microvesicles such as exosomes and circulate in the bloodstream, where they can be identified and quantified in biological fluids like plasma or serum (Valadi et al., 2007; Hunter et al., 2008; Turchinovich et al., 2011; Witwer, 2015). Circulating miRNAs are actively being studied and applied as biomarkers for specific traits, including various human cancers (Roth et al., 2010; Reid et al., 2011; Sørensen et al., 2014) and pregnancy diagnosis (Ioannidis and Donadeu, 2017), estrus (Ioannidis and Donadeu, 2016) and aging (Ioannidis et al., 2018) in dairy cattle.

In previous study, we identified 11 potential circulating miRNA biomarkers related to HS in lactating Holstein cows (Lee et al., 2020). This study compares miRNA profiles of lactating Jersey cows, known for superior heat tolerance, to those of Holstein cows under HS conditions.

All animal experimental protocols and procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Animal Science, South Korea (approval number: NIAS-068).

Experimental animals

Before the start of the experiments, veterinarians and farmers conducted regular health assessments of the cows at the Dairy Research Center in National Institute of Animal Science, selecting four lactating Holstein-Friesian cows and two Jersey cows that were confirmed to be healthy and disease-free. Holstein cows have an average of 239.25 ± 66.95 days in milk (mean ± standard deviation) and for Jersey cows, it is 206 ± 41.01 days. Individual cow details, including age, parity, and calving date can be found in Table 1. The cows were provided with a total mixed ration (TMR), prepared as previously described (Lee et al., 2024). Briefly, the TMR was formulated following the National Research Council guidelines (National Research Council, 2001). For lactating cows, the ration was mixed twice daily and provided at 09:00 and 15:00. All animals had unrestricted access to fresh water and minerals. Lactating Holstein and Jersey cows were fed the same diet in a shared area. Following the experiment, the cows were housed for further research.

Table 1 . Information on each cow used in this experiment

Individual IDBreedBirth dateParityPrevious calving dateMilking days (as of 15th Aug)Expected calving date
08120Holstein8th Oct 2008427th Nov 201726230th Mar 2019
13003Holstein4th Jan 201315th Dec 201725412th Feb 2019
14106Holstein26th Nov 2014126th Mar 20181431st Apr 2019
15044Holstein21th May 2015122th Oct 201729820th Feb 2019
J1404Jersey27th Feb 2014320th Feb 201817729th Jan 2019
J1405Jersey20th Mar 2014223th Dec 201723529th Dec 2018


HS indicators

1) Temperature-humidity index (THI)

To monitor the THI in the barn, a THI measuring device (Testo-174d, 5720500, Germany) was installed at three different locations within the barn. This device automatically recorded temperature and relative humidity, with measurements taken 12 times daily at 2-hour intervals. The THI was calculated using the following formula (Mader et al., 2006; Dikmen and Hansen, 2009). THI = 0.8 × temperature (℃) + [(relative humidity (%)/100) × (temperature (℃) - 14.4)] + 46.4.

2) Rectal temperature

Rectal temperature was taken concurrently with blood collection. To obtain the rectal temperature, any feces were cleared from the cow’s rectum. Using a rectal thermometer (POLYGREEN Co. Ltd., Germany), temperatures were manually recorded at 14:00 under both HS (THI: 86.29) and non-HS (THI: 60.87) conditions. For precision, each measurement was repeated three times per cow, with the thermometer inserted at a depth of over 15 cm into the rectum.

3) Milk yield measurement and body weight

Milk production and body weight were automatically recorded by a milking robot (Lely, Astronaut, Netherlands) during the milking process from June to October. The average daily gain (ADG) was calculated using the body weight data. To determine the relative average milk yield (RAMY), each cow’s milk production from June to October was compared to the average milk yield in May.

Statistical analysis

The quantitative data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 26.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). To account for unequal sample sizes and variances, Welch’s t-test was used for pairwise comparisons, and Welch’s ANOVA was applied for comparisons across multiple groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, unless stated otherwise.

Blood collection

All cows were housed in a barn designed for natural ventilation. Daily THI values were calculated based on recorded air temperature and humidity, and the sampling date was selected when the daily minimum THI remained above 72 and the daily maximum THI stayed below 72 for over four weeks (Fig. 1). Whole blood samples were taken from the jugular vein of the same cows (Hol = 4, Jer = 2) during two distinct environmental seasons (summer and autumn) using PAXgene Blood RNA tubes (2.5 mL per cow; Qiagen, 762165, California, USA). The PAXgene Blood RNA tubes were stored at -80℃ until miRNA extraction.

Figure 1. Temperature-humidity index measured on dairy barn. The black line represents daily THI maximum and the grey line represents daily THI minimum. The tilted boxes represent THI on the day of sampling (modified from Lee et al. (2020)).

MiRNA-sequencing experiment and statistical analysis

MiRNAs were extracted from whole blood using the PAXgene Blood MicroRNA Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentrations of miRNAs were measured with a NanoDrop device (Optigen NANO Q, South Korea). miRNA integrity was evaluated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), ensuring an RNA integrity number of 7 or higher. Library preparation involved adapter ligation, reverse transcription, PCR amplification, and pooled gel purification, performed with the Truseq Small RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The library was then loaded into the Illumina Hiseq2000 sequencer, which contained millions of unique clusters. Raw sequencing reads of circulating miRNAs from all samples were pre-processed and analysed using miRDeep2 software. Adapter sequences added during the small RNA library construction were removed using Cutadapt v.1.9.1, and reads of at least 18 bp were collected to form clusters for increased accuracy. The processed and clustered reads were aligned with the Bos Taurus reference genome and further mapped to precursor and mature miRNAs from miRBase v21. miRDeep2 software was used to identify both known and novel miRNAs and estimate their expression levels. Differential gene expression analysis was conducted using the Limma voom v3.34.9 R package (Grimson et al., 2007; Robinson et al., 2010; Vejnar and Zdobnov, 2012). Prior to the analysis, genes with raw read counts were removed using the ‘filterByExpr’ function in the edgeR R package (Robinson et al., 2010). Then, TMM normalization was applied to standardize the size of each library using the ‘calcNormFactors’ function in edgeR. Subsequently, the ‘voom’ function in Limma was utilized to convert read counts into a logarithmic (base 2) scale for linear modeling. Differentially expressed (DE) genes between the two groups were identified using empirical Bayes and moderated t-test. A p-value < 0.01 and a logarithmic fold change (FC) of |logFC| > 2 were set as the criteria for significance.

Bioinformatics analysis

To predict target genes for DE miRNAs, miRmap (v1.2.0, mirmap.ezlab.org) databases were utilized (Vejnar and Zdobnov, 2012). Target genes were selected based on a miRmap Score of ≥ 80, provided by the respective programs, to ensure higher accuracy in the analysis. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was conducted using the PANTHER Classification System (v.19.0) (Mi et al., 2013) to determine the functional significance of the gene set. Additionally, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was performed by submitting the target gene list to DAVID Bioinformatics Resources (v2024q2) (Dennis et al., 2003) to identify enriched signalling pathways associated with these target genes.

Estimation of THI and blood collection

To estimate THI, we recorded the ambient temperature and relative humidity inside the barn daily (Fig. 1). Starting from the first week of July, the minimum THI exceeded 72, occasionally surpassing 80, indicating moderate to severe HS conditions (THI > 78) lasted for over one month. Both maximum and minimum THI values reached their highest around mid-August and then gradually declined; however, mild to moderate HS (THI 72-78) continued until the end of September. Whole blood samples were collected at 14:00 from both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows during the summer (HS) and autumn (non-HS). On sampling days, the THI ranged from 79.10 to 87.73 (14:00; 86.29) for HS and from 47.30 to 64.85 (14:00; 60.87) for non-HS. The minimum THI remained above 72 (the threshold for HS) for 36 consecutive days until HS sampling, while the maximum THI stayed below 72 for 28 days prior to non-HS sampling.

Effects of HS on physiological changes

We assessed physiological indicators of HS, including rectal temperature, milk yield, and ADG in lactating Holstein and Jersey cows. Rectal temperatures were recorded concurrently with blood collection. Under non-HS conditions, no significant differences were observed between Holstein (38.40℃ ± 0.07) and Jersey cows (37.80℃ ± 0.50). In contrast, during HS conditions, the rectal temperatures of Holstein cows (40.15℃ ± 0.17) were significantly higher than those of Jersey cows (38.95℃ ± 0.05, p = 0.0022, Fig. 2A).

Figure 2. Physiological indicators of heat stress recorded under environmental conditions in both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows (modified from Lee et al. (2020) for Holstein data). (A) Rectal temperature recorded on the day of sampling. (B) Relative average milk yield (RAMY) to May. (C) Average daily gain (ADG). Statistical significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

To assess the impact of HS on milk yield, we calculated the RAMY, defined as the ratio of the total milk yield for each month during the study period to the yield in May. Both Holstein and Jersey cows showed a gradual decline in RAMY, with a particularly significant drop observed in Holstein cows during the extreme heat of August. However, no differences in RAMY were observed across all months in Jersey cows. Recovery of RAMY was seen in September (Fig. 2B), suggesting that HS may have a more pronounced effect on the milk production of Holstein cows.

We also evaluated the influence of HS on growth performance by analysing changes in ADG for both Holstein and Jersey cows throughout the experimental period. As illustrated in Fig. 2C, ADG generally increased in both Holstein and Jersey cows, except in July, even though overall ADG during the summer was significantly lower.

Identification of DE miRNAs of HS cows

We performed small RNA sequencing on miRNAs isolated from whole blood to identify DE miRNAs between heat-stressed and non-heat-stressed Holstein and Jersey cows. In the lactating Holstein cows, 28 miRNAs showed significant differential expression (≥ 2-FC in the expression compared to non-HS controls; p < 0.05), including 10 upregulated and 18 downregulated miRNAs. In the Jersey cows, 38 DE miRNAs were identified (23 upregulated, 15 downregulated; ≥ 2-FC and p < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2 . Differentially expressed microRNAs in Holstein and Jersey under heat stressed conditions (for the expression profile of Holstein cows, refer to the previous study (Lee et al., 2020)

BreedMature microRNARNA sequencing fold change (heat stress/non-heat stress) ≥ 2 (p < 0.05)
HolsteinFC value: up-regulation
Bta-miR-19a3.49
Bta-miR-19b3.34
Bta-miR-20b2.40
Bta-miR-29d-3p3.77
Bta-miR-106a2.25
Bta-miR-378d2.39
Bta-miR-4974.24
Bta-miR-502a2.46
Bta-miR-2285ad2.44
Bta-miR-2285o5.98
FC value: down-regulation
Bta-miR-30a-5p-4.44
Bta-miR-146b-2.08
Bta-miR-296-3p-2.11
Bta-miR-1246-9.49
Bta-miR-2284a-17.52
Bta-miR-2284aa-2.31
Bta-miR-2284ab-2.40
Bta-miR-2284b-3.61
Bta-miR-2284h-5p-8.05
Bta-miR-2284k-7.77
Bta-miR-2284r-2.82
Bta-miR-2284v-2.84
Bta-miR-2284w-2.69
Bta-miR-2284x-10.37
Bta-miR-2284y-9.95
Bta-miR-2284z-2.19
Bta-miR-2397-5p-2.08
Bta-miR-2457-2.15
JerseyFC value: up-regulation
Bta-let-7a-5p2.86
Bta-let-7c2.83
Bta-let-7e2.55
Bta-let-7f3.37
Bta-let-7g3.09
Bta-let-7i2.02
Bta-miR-1413.54
Bta-miR-1442.52
Bta-miR-148a2.25
Bta-miR-1584-3p4.40
Bta-miR-196b7.06
Bta-miR-20b3.63
Bta-miR-23362.44
Bta-miR-2419-3p8.48
Bta-miR-2450a3.55
Bta-miR-26b2.03
Bta-miR-3432a3.77
Bta-miR-411a3.74
JerseyBta-miR-42911.04
Bta-miR-4542.77
Bta-miR-785915.11
Bta-miR-9-5p3.06
Bta-miR-982.87
FC value: down-regulation
Bta-miR-1246-4.43
Bta-miR-133a-4.06
Bta-miR-1343-3p-2.08
Bta-miR-151-3p-2.49
Bta-miR-1843-3.90
Bta-miR-191-2.19
Bta-miR-204-2.08
Bta-miR-2284x-2.11
Bta-miR-2284y-2.06
Bta-miR-2332-5.20
Bta-miR-2389-3.11
Bta-miR-2394-4.08
Bta-miR-2419-5p-2.15
Bta-miR-2453-8.03
Bta-miR-324-3.35


Additionally, we examined the profiles of 11 candidate DE miRNAs identified in a previous study conducted on Holstein cows to validate their expression in Jersey cows (Lee et al., 2020). The expression patterns (up / downregulation) in Jersey cows were consistent with those observed in Holstein cows; however, the expression levels (|HS/NJS|) in Jersey cows were lower, and no significant differences were found 9 of the DE miRNAs, except for bta-miR-2284x and bta-miR-2284y (p > 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3 . Comparison of expression profiles of candidate circulating microRNA biomarkers related to heat stress (identified in a previous study; Lee et al., 2020) in lactating Holstein and Jersey cows

miRNAHolsteinJersey


Fold change (heat stress/non-heat stress)p-valueFold change (heat stress/non-heat stress)p-value
Bta-miR-19a3.49< 0.051.800.26
Bta-miR-19b3.34< 0.052.070.11
Bta-miR-30a-5p-4.44< 0.05-1.920.07
Bta-miR-2284a-17.52< 0.05-1.850.74
Bta-miR-2284b-3.61< 0.05-2.740.08
Bta-miR-2284h-5p-8.05< 0.05-2.600.06
Bta-miR-2284k-7.77< 0.05-1.260.83
Bta-miR-2284v-2.84< 0.05-1.920.10
Bta-miR-2284w-2.69< 0.05-1.560.20
Bta-miR-2284x-10.37< 0.05-2.110.04
Bta-miR-2284y-9.95< 0.05-2.060.04


Putative target gene and signalling pathway analysis

In a previous study on lactating Holstein cows, we identified 2,798 potential target genes for 28 DE miRNAs using miRmap and TargetScan. In this study, we identified 6,108 potential target genes for 38 DE miRNAs in lactating Jersey cows using miRmap. Additionally, we investigated the potential target genes of 4 common DE miRNAs using miRmap and identified 500 genes. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using DAVID and PANTHER. The GSEA results indicated that these predicted target genes were linked to the corpus luteum function and progesterone biosynthesis and numerous genes also involved in the immune responses (Table 4). Additionally, KEGG pathway analysis revealed 9 statistically significant pathways (Table 5). Notably, pathways such as the metabolic pathway, Fanconi anemia pathway and FoxO signaling pathway were found to be closely associated with the HS response.

Table 4 . Predicted target genes related to heat stress responses of microRNAs differentially expressed in Holstein and Jersey cows

DE miRNADirection of gene regulationTarget genesResponses
Bta-miR-20bDownXCL1, CCL1Improvement of corpus luteum function
Bta-miR-1246UpStARProgesterone biosynthesis
Bta-miR-2284xUpNumerous genes involved in the immune responses (data are not shown)
Bta-miR-2284yUpNumerous genes involved in the immune responses (data are not shown)

DE miRNAs, differentially expressed miRNAs.


Table 5 . KEGG pathways enriched for targets of differentially expressed miRNAs in Holstein and Jersey cows

TermNumber of genesp-value
bta01100: Metabolic pathways510.0055
bta04144: Endocytosis120.019
bta03460: Fanconi anemia pathway50.025
bta04068: FoxO signaling pathway80.026
bta00600: Sphingolipid metabolism50.036
bta05210: Colorectal cancer60.048
bta05226: Gastric cancer80.049
bta05167: Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection100.049
bta04520: Adherens junction60.050

The THI is commonly utilized as a measure to evaluate the intensity of HS in livestock, as an accurate and reliable estimation of heat load can help reduce or prevent economic losses, including reduced reproductive efficiency and decreased milk production in dairy cattle (Bohmanova et al., 2007; Habeeb et al., 2018). THI values are categorized into five distinct levels: no HS (THI < 72), mild HS (72 ≤ THI ≤ 78), moderate HS (78 < THI < 89), severe HS (89 ≤ THI ≤ 98), and extreme HS that can lead to mortality (THI > 98) (Armstrong, 1994; Dash et al., 2016). THI values are categorized into five distinct levels: no HS (THI < 72), mild HS (72 ≤ THI ≤ 78), moderate HS (78 < THI < 89), severe HS (89 ≤ THI ≤ 98), and extreme HS that can lead to mortality (THI > 98) (Armstrong, 1994; Dash et al., 2016). To determine if the cows were experiencing HS, we analysed the relationship between THI and physiological parameters such as milk yield and ADG. Blood samples were collected during a period when mild HS persisted for more than a month (specifically 36 days), during which both milk yield and ADG declined. Control samples (non-HS) were obtained four weeks after the minimum THI had stabilized below 72, indicating that cows subjected to HS can fully recover from prolonged HS, as evidenced by improved milk yield and ADG.

It is noteworthy that the significant reduction in milk production observed in Holstein and Jersey cows during the summer may be partly attributed to decreased feed intake. The more pronounced decline in milk yield in Holstein cows compared to Jersey cows is consistent with previous findings suggesting that Jersey cows may be more resilient to high temperatures (Roche, 2003; Smith et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2023). The feed intake was indirectly assessed using ADG. In this study, the negative ADG observed in HS cows suggests that HS may indirectly lead to reduced feed intake and appetite, ultimately causing weight loss. All lactating Holstein and Jersey cows used in this study were pregnant, and the substantial increase in ADG observed from September, after the summer period, could be attributed to compensatory placental growth driven by increased feed intake (Lee et al., 2020). Consistent with earlier research that demonstrated a positive correlation between rectal temperature and THI values (Dikmen and Hansen, 2009; Lee et al., 2020), and differences in rectal temperature according to breed (Muller and Botha, 1993), our findings also showed that Jersey cows had lower rectal temperatures compared to Holstein cows, indicating that Jersey cows are more resilient to HS. These physiological indicators confirm that Holstein cows exhibit greater sensitivity to thermal stress compared to Jersey cows.

To gain deeper insights into the relationship between these physiological markers, biological processes, and cellular responses to HS, we conducted RNA-sequencing analysis to identify DE miRNAs. An in silico method was utilized for miRNA target prediction, as circulating miRNAs in body fluids are known to influence various biological processes and could serve as potential biomarkers for the HS response. We examined 4 DE miRNAs that were commonly expressed in both Holstein and Jersey cows under HS conditions (Table 4). Interestingly, bioinformatics analysis indicated that these miRNAs are predicted to target genes involved in corpus luteum function, including progesterone biosynthesis. In our previous studies, the upregulated bta-miR-20b was found to target XCL1 (Lee et al., 2020), while the downregulated bta-miR-1246 targets StAR, a key gene involved in progesterone biosynthesis. Additionally, downregulated bta-miR-2284x and 2284y which are ruminant specific miRNAs have been reported to target numerous genes related to the immune response (Lee et al., 2020). Although we did not measure progesterone levels in this study, previous research has reported controversial findings regarding plasma progesterone levels under HS conditions (Wolfenson et al., 2000). Some studies have observed a decline in plasma progesterone levels during HS (Wise et al., 1988b; Wolfenson et al., 1988), while others have found no significant change or even an increase in progesterone levels (Thatcher and Roman-Ponce, 1981; Wise et al., 1988a). These variations can be attributed to several factors, such as the potential release of progesterone from the adrenal glands, hepatic metabolism, changes in blood volume (haemodilution or haemoconcentration), the severity and type of heat exposure (acute vs. chronic), as well as the age of cows, lactation stage, and feeding regimen, all of which influence the observed effects of HS on plasma progesterone levels (Jonsson et al., 1997; Trout et al., 1998).

Using an integrative approach with predicted target genes of DE miRNAs and DAVID, several KEGG pathways were identified, including metabolic pathways, Fanconi anemia pathway, FoxO signaling pathway, Sphingolipid metabolism associated with HS. The Fanconi anemia pathway is essential for recovering from HS by repairing DNA damage resulting from the overproduction of ROS in high-temperature environment (Yoshimoto et al., 2012; Kupfer, 2013; Li et al., 2024). The FoxO signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the transcriptional activation of heat shock proteins under HS conditions (Donovan and Marr, 2016; Farhan et al., 2017). We also found that the sphingolipid metabolism pathway is affected by HS, which can influence protein metabolism and subsequently impact growth performance in mammals (Liu et al., 2022).

Finally, when comparing the 11 potential miRNA biomarkers identified in Holstein cows from our previous study with those in Jersey cows, we found that although the expression trends (up / down) were similar to those observed in Holstein cows, the expression levels in Jersey cows were not statistically significant, and the magnitude of expression changes (|FC|) was lower compared to Holstein cows (Table 3) (Lee et al., 2020). This suggests that Jersey cows may have greater resilience to HS compared to Holstein cows, supporting findings from previous studies (Lee et al., 2023). The findings of this study are limited by the small dataset and the lack of functional validation of the roles of DE miRNAs in Holstein and Jersey cows. Therefore, further studies are needed to verify our results using a larger population and to investigate the specific roles of each DE miRNA under controlled environmental conditions.

We evaluated physiological HS indicators, including rectal temperature, milk production, and ADG in both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows, revealing that Holstein cows are more susceptible to HS conditions. RNA-sequencing-based transcriptome analysis of miRNAs identified 4 DE miRNAs (bta-miR-20b, bta-miR-1246, bta-miR-2284x and bta-miR-2284y) in both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows (|FC| ≥ 2, p < 0,05). Among these, bta-miR-20b, which is upregulated under HS, and bta-miR-1246, which is downregulated, were found to target several genes associated with corpus luteum function and progesterone biosynthesis. The remaining miRNAs, bta-miR-2284x and 2284y, were shown to be related to immune response. Furthermore, when we compared the expression levels of 11 potential HS biomarkers previously identified in lactating Holstein cows to those in lactating Jersey cows, the expression trends (up / down) were similar, but the magnitude of expression changes (|FC|) was lower in Jersey compared to Holstein cows. These findings suggest that Jersey cows may have greater resilience to HS.

Conceptualization, J.L., I.C.; data curation, J.L.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, J.L.; methodology, J.L., B.L., I.C.; project administration, J.L., T.C., S.K.; resources, J.L., D.K., G.R., H.B., J.K., S.H.; supervision, S.L., T.C., I.C.; writing - original draft, J.L.; writing - review & editing, J.L., I.C.

This research was supported by the National Institute of Animal Science, Project (PJ015006), with the goal of improving productivity and sustainability in the dairy sector through innovative research and development efforts.

All animal experimental protocols and procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Animal Science, South Korea (approval number: NIAS-068).

  1. Armstrong DV. 1994. Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2044-2050.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Baumgard LH, Rhoads RP, Rhoads ML, Gabler NK, Ross JW, Keating AF, Boddicker RL, Sejian V. 2012. Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production. In: . Springer, Berlin, pp. 413-468.
    CrossRef
  3. Bohmanova J, Cole JB. 2007. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1947-1956.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB). 2020. Summary of 2020 DHI herd averages: DHI report K-3. CDCB. [Retrieved September 29, 2024]. from https://queries.uscdcb.com/publish/dhi/dhi21/haall.html.
  5. Dash S, Chakravarty AK, Singh A, Upadhyay A, Yousuf S. 2016. Effect of heat stress on reproductive performances of dairy cattle and buffaloes: a review. Vet. World 9:235-244.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lempicki RA. 2003. DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 4:P3.
    CrossRef
  7. Dikmen S and Hansen PJ. 2009. Is the temperature-humidity index the best indicator of heat stress in lactating dairy cows in a subtropical environment? J. Dairy Sci. 92:109-116.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Donovan MR and Marr MT 2nd. 2016. dFOXO activates large and small heat shock protein genes in response to oxidative stress to maintain proteostasis in Drosophila. J. Biol. Chem. 291:19042-19050.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Farhan M, Wang H, Gaur U, Little PJ, Zheng W. 2017. FOXO signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 13:815-827.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Grimson A, Farh KK, Johnston WK, Garrett-Engele P, Bartel DP. 2007. MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol. Cell. 27:91-105.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Ha M and Kim VN. 2014. Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:509-524.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Habeeb AA, Atta MA. 2018. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators to heat stress of climatic conditions with relation to production and reproduction of farm animals. Int. J. Biotechnol. Recent Adv. 1:35-50.
    CrossRef
  13. Hansen PJ. 2019. Reproductive physiology of the heat-stressed dairy cow: implications for fertility and assisted reproduction. Anim. Reprod. 16:497-507.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Hunter MP, Ismail N, Zhang X, Aguda BD, Lee EJ, Yu L, Xiao T, Schafer J, Lee ML, Schmittgen TD, Nana-Sinkam SP, Marsh CB. 2008. Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PLoS One 3:e3694.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Ioannidis J and Donadeu FX. 2016. Circulating microRNA profiles during the bovine oestrous cycle. PLoS One 11:e0158160.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Ioannidis J and Donadeu FX. 2017. Changes in circulating microRNA levels can be identified as early as day 8 of pregnancy in cattle. PLoS One 12:e0174892.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Ioannidis J, Sánchez-Molano E, Psifidi A, Banos G. 2018. Association of plasma microRNA expression with age, genetic background and functional traits in dairy cattle. Sci. Rep. 8:12955.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Jonsson NN, McGowan MR, McGuigan K, Davison TM, Hussain AM, Matschoss A. 1997. Relationships among calving season, heat load, energy balance and postpartum ovulation of dairy cows in a subtropical environment. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 47:315-326.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Jurkovich V, Somoskői B, Bakony M. 2023. The effects of heat stress in Jersey, Hungarian Simmental and Holstein-Friesian cows. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 32:68-75.
    CrossRef
  20. Kim VN, Siomi MC. 2009. Biogenesis of small RNAs in animals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:126-139.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Kim VN and Nam JW. 2006. Genomics of microRNA. Trends Genet. 22:165-173.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. KTimes. 2024. Korea sees highest average summer temperature on record. The Korea Times. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2024/12/371_381933.html.
  23. Kupfer GM. 2013. Fanconi anemia: a signal transduction and DNA repair pathway. Yale J. Biol. Med. 86:491-497.
  24. Lee J, Kim D, Son J, Kim D, Jeon E, Jung D, Han M, Ha S, Choi I. 2023. Effects of heat stress on conception in Holstein and Jersey cattle and oocyte maturation in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 65:324-335.
    CrossRef
  25. Lee J, Lee S, Ryu G, Kim D, Baek HU, Kim J, Lee K, Kim S, Kim S, Dang CG, Choi I. 2024. A retrospective analysis of conception per embryo transfer in dairy cattle in South Korea. Theriogenology 226:363-368.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Lee J, Lee S, Son J, Lim H, Kim E, Kim D, Ha S, Hur T, Choi I. 2020. Analysis of circulating-microRNA expression in lactating Holstein cows under summer heat stress. PLoS One 15:e0231125.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Li J, Duan Y, Kong W, Gao H, Fu S, Li H, Zhou Y, Liu H, Zhou C. 2024. Heat stress affects swimming performance and induces biochemical, structural, and transcriptional changes in the heart of Gymnocypris eckloni. Aquacult. Rep. 35:101998.
    CrossRef
  28. Liu H, Zhang B, Li F, Liu L, Yang T, Li F. 2022. Effects of heat stress on growth performance, carcass traits, serum metabolism, and intestinal microflora of meat rabbits. Front Microbiol. 13:998095.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Liu J, Li L, Chen X, Wang D. 2019. Effects of heat stress on body temperature, milk production, and reproduction in dairy cows: a novel idea for monitoring and evaluation of heat stress-a review. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 32:1332-1339.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Mader TL, Brown-Brandl T. 2006. Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 84:712-719.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Mi H, Thomas PD. 2013. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic. Acids Res. 41:D377-D386.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Muller CJC and Botha JA. 1993. Effect of summer climatic conditions on different heat tolerance indicators in primiparous Friesian and Jersey cows. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 23:98-103.
  33. National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed, The National Academies Press, Washington.
  34. Nebel RL, Jobst SM, Dransfield MBG, Bailey TL. 1997. Use of radio frequency data communication system, HeatWatch®, to describe behavioral estrus in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 80(Suppl 1:179.
  35. Norman HD, Guinan FL, Dürr JW. 2020. Reproductive status of cows in Dairy Herd Improvement programs and bred using artificial insemination (2020). Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding. [Retrieved September 29, 2024]. from https://queries.uscdcb.com/publish/dhi/current/reproall.html.
  36. Norman HD, Wright JR, Hubbard SM, Hutchison JL. 2009. Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 92:3517-3528.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Pragna P, Archana PR, Aleena J, Sejian V, Krishnan G, Bagath M, Manimaran A, Beena V, Kurien EK, Bhatta R. 2017. Heat stress and dairy cow: impact on both milk yield and composition. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 12:1-11.
    CrossRef
  38. Putney DJ, Thatcher WW. 1989. Influence of summer heat stress on pregnancy rates of lactating dairy cattle following embryo transfer or artificial insemination. Theriogenology 31:765-778.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Reid G, van Zandwijk N. 2011. Circulating microRNAs: association with disease and potential use as biomarkers. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 80:193-208.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Robinson MD, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139-140.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Roche JR. 2003. Effect of pregnancy on milk production and bodyweight from identical twin study. J. Dairy Sci. 86:777-783.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Roth C, Rack B, Müller V, Janni W, Schwarzenbach H. 2010. Circulating microRNAs as blood-based markers for patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 12:R90.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Roth Z. 2020. Influence of heat stress on reproduction in dairy cows-physiological and practical aspects. J. Anim. Sci. 98(Suppl 1:S80-S87.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Smith DL, Smith T, Ward SH. 2013. Short communication: comparison of the effects of heat stress on milk and component yields and somatic cell score in Holstein and Jersey cows. J. Dairy Sci. 96:3028-3033.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Sørensen AE, Wissing ML, Salö S, Dalgaard LT. 2014. MicroRNAs related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Genes (Basel) 5:684-708.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Tao S, Dahl GE, Laporta J, Bernard JK, Marins TN. 2019. PHYSIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: effects of heat stress during late gestation on the dam and its calf12. J. Anim. Sci. 97:2245-2257.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Thatcher WW and Roman-Ponce H. 1981. Effects of climate on bovine reproduction. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 301-309.
  48. Trout JP, Hansen PJ. 1998. Characteristics of the estrous cycle and antioxidant status of lactating Holstein cows exposed to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1244-1250.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Turchinovich A, Weiz L, Burwinkel B. 2011. Characterization of extracellular circulating microRNA. Nucleic. Acids Res. 39:7223-7233.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  50. Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lötvall JO. 2007. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:654-659.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Vejnar CE and Zdobnov EM. 2012. MiRmap: comprehensive prediction of microRNA target repression strength. Nucleic. Acids Res. 40:11673-11683.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. West JW. 1999. Nutritional strategies for managing the heat-stressed dairy cow. J. Anim. Sci. 77(Suppl 2):21-35.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Wiggans GR. 2000. USDA summary of 2000 herd averages. [Retrived September 29, 2024]. from https://queries.uscdcb.com/publish/dhi/dhi01/k3.shtml.
  54. Wise ME, Armstrong DV, Huber JT, Wiersma F. 1988a. Hormonal alterations in the lactating dairy cow in response to thermal stress. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2480-2485.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Wise ME, Rodriguez RE, Armstrong DV, Huber JT, Hunter R. 1988b. Fertility and hormonal responses to temporary relief of heat stress in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 29:1027-1035.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Witwer KW. 2015. Circulating microRNA biomarker studies: pitfalls and potential solutions. Clin. Chem. 61:56-63.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Wolfenson D, Berman A. 1988. Hyperthermia and body energy store effects on estrous behavior, conception rate, and corpus luteum function in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 71:3497-3504.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Wolfenson D and Roth Z. 2018. Impact of heat stress on cow reproduction and fertility. Anim. Front. 9:32-38.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Wolfenson D, Meidan R. 2000. Impaired reproduction in heat-stressed cattle: basic and applied aspects. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60-61:535-547.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Yoshimoto K, Mizoguchi M, Hata N, Murata H, Hatae R, Amano T, Sasaki T. 2012. Complex DNA repair pathways as possible therapeutic targets to overcome temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. Front. Oncol. 2:186.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

Article

Original Article

Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2024; 39(4): 221-232

Published online December 31, 2024 https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.39.4.221

Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.

Differential expression of circulating microRNAs in lactating Holstein and Jersey cows exposed to heat stress

Jihwan Lee1 , Doosan Kim1 , Byeonghwi Lim2 , Gyeonglim Ryu1 , Hyeonguk Baek1 , Joohwan Kim3 , Seungmin Ha4 , Sangbum Kim1 , Seunghwan Lee5,* , Taejeong Choi1,* and Inchul Choi5,*

1Dairy Science Division, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Cheonan 31000, Korea
2Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea
3Dairy Biotechnology R&D Center, Seoul Milk Cooperation, Yangpyeong 12528, Korea
4Animal Genetic Resources Research Center, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, Hamyang 50000, Korea
5Division of Animal and Dairy Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea

Correspondence to:Taejeong Choi
E-mail: choi6695@korea.kr

Inchul Choi
E-mail: icchoi@cnu.ac.kr

Seunghwan Lee
E-mail: slee46@cnu.ac.kr

Received: October 3, 2024; Revised: November 26, 2024; Accepted: November 26, 2024

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background: South Korea has recently faced record-high temperatures, which have adversely affected dairy production. Holstein cows, the primary dairy breed globally, are particularly sensitive to heat stress. In contrast, Jersey cows have shown greater heat tolerance, as demonstrated by phenotypic studies.
Methods: We investigated physiological and molecular responses to heat stress in Holstein and Jersey cows by measuring rectal temperature, milk yield, and average daily gain, confirming Holstein cows’ greater vulnerability. To explore molecular mechanisms, we analyzed circulating microRNA profiles from whole blood samples collected under heat stress and normal conditions using microRNA-sequencing. Differential expression patterns were compared between the two breeds to identify biological pathways associated with heat stress.
Results: Four microRNAs (bta-miR-20b, bta-miR-1246, bta-miR-2284x, and bta-miR- 2284y) were significantly differentially expressed in both breeds under heat stress (|FC| ≥ 2, p < 0.05). Notably, bta-miR-20b and bta-miR-1246 were linked to corpus luteum function and progesterone biosynthesis, while bta-miR-2284x and bta-miR- 2284y were associated with immune responses. A comparison of 11 potential heat stress-related microRNAs identified in previous studies of Holstein cows revealed consistent expression trends in Jersey cows, albeit with lower fold changes, suggesting their superior heat resilience.
Conclusions: Our study highlights the physiological and microRNA-based differences in heat stress responses between Holstein and Jersey cows. Jersey cows exhibited greater resilience, supported by more stable microRNA expression profiles and improved heat stress indicators, making them a promising breed for dairy production in increasingly hot climates.

Keywords: circulating microRNA, heat stress, Holstein, Jersey, lactation

INTRODUCTION

In the summer of 2024, South Korea recorded its highest average temperature (25.6℃) since nationwide weather observation began in 1973 (KTimes, 2024). Additionally, the national average number of tropical nights reached 20.2 days, more than three times the normal level (KTimes, 2024). The highest temperature since meteorological observations began in 1907 (over 40℃) was recorded relatively recently, in 2018 (Lee et al., 2020).

Holstein-Friesian breed is the most common dairy cattle breed worldwide, but it is highly susceptible to heat, which leads to reduced milk production and decreased reproductive performance under heat stress (HS) conditions, ultimately lowering farmers’ economic income (Wolfenson and Roth, 2018; Tao et al., 2019). In the case of Holstein cows, milk production decreases by 30-40% under HS conditions compared to normal conditions (West, 1999; Baumgard et al., 2012; Pragna et al., 2017). Particularly, the conception rate of Holstein cows is 39.4 % at a temperature-humidity index (THI) below 72 (non-HS conditions), but it decreases to 31.6 % when THI exceeds 78.0 (intermediate HS) (Liu et al., 2018). In Florida, conception rates for lactating cows during the summer are particularly low, at only 13.5 % (Putney et al., 1989). This reduction in conception rates may be attributed to hormonal changes during the summer, such as decreases in E2 and LH levels (Wolfenson and Roth, 2018; Roth, 2020). Nebel et al. (1997) reported that the number of mounts per estrus also decreased by nearly half in the summer compared to the winter (Nebel et al., 1997; Hansen, 2019).

Jersey breed, the second most common dairy breed worldwide, is relatively known for its heat tolerance (Wiggans, 2000; CDCB, 2020). In South Korea, Jersey cattle embryos have been imported from Canada and the United States since 2012, with the aim of improving milk fat and protein content in dairy products, as well as addressing climate change to promote the sustainability of dairy farming (Lee et al., 2023). Notably, under HS conditions with a THI exceeding 68, one study reported that the average daily milk yield of Holstein cows decreased from 35.6 kg to 34.2 kg, whereas Jersey cows showed an increase in milk yield from 25.9 kg to 26.6 kg (Smith et al., 2013). Similarly, in Hungary, it was observed that milk production in Holstein cows decreased in summer compared to spring, while Jersey cows showed similar milk production levels between the two seasons (Jurkovich et al., 2023). Moreover, in terms of reproductive performance, the conception rate of Jersey cattle was inherently higher than that of Holstein cattle (Norman et al., 2009; Norman et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2023). Although the conception rates of both breeds declined sharply when the THI exceeded 75, the decrease was more pronounced in Holstein cows compared to Jersey cows (Lee et al., 2023).

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small endogenous RNA molecules, typically 18 to 22 nucleotides in length, that function as non-coding RNAs. They play a key role in RNA silencing and are involved in various developmental and pathological processes in animals by regulating numerous protein-coding transcripts (Kim and Nam, 2006; Kim et al., 2009; Ha and Kim, 2014). Recent studies have shown that miRNAs are exporting to the extracellular environment through microvesicles such as exosomes and circulate in the bloodstream, where they can be identified and quantified in biological fluids like plasma or serum (Valadi et al., 2007; Hunter et al., 2008; Turchinovich et al., 2011; Witwer, 2015). Circulating miRNAs are actively being studied and applied as biomarkers for specific traits, including various human cancers (Roth et al., 2010; Reid et al., 2011; Sørensen et al., 2014) and pregnancy diagnosis (Ioannidis and Donadeu, 2017), estrus (Ioannidis and Donadeu, 2016) and aging (Ioannidis et al., 2018) in dairy cattle.

In previous study, we identified 11 potential circulating miRNA biomarkers related to HS in lactating Holstein cows (Lee et al., 2020). This study compares miRNA profiles of lactating Jersey cows, known for superior heat tolerance, to those of Holstein cows under HS conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All animal experimental protocols and procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Animal Science, South Korea (approval number: NIAS-068).

Experimental animals

Before the start of the experiments, veterinarians and farmers conducted regular health assessments of the cows at the Dairy Research Center in National Institute of Animal Science, selecting four lactating Holstein-Friesian cows and two Jersey cows that were confirmed to be healthy and disease-free. Holstein cows have an average of 239.25 ± 66.95 days in milk (mean ± standard deviation) and for Jersey cows, it is 206 ± 41.01 days. Individual cow details, including age, parity, and calving date can be found in Table 1. The cows were provided with a total mixed ration (TMR), prepared as previously described (Lee et al., 2024). Briefly, the TMR was formulated following the National Research Council guidelines (National Research Council, 2001). For lactating cows, the ration was mixed twice daily and provided at 09:00 and 15:00. All animals had unrestricted access to fresh water and minerals. Lactating Holstein and Jersey cows were fed the same diet in a shared area. Following the experiment, the cows were housed for further research.

Table 1. Information on each cow used in this experiment.

Individual IDBreedBirth dateParityPrevious calving dateMilking days (as of 15th Aug)Expected calving date
08120Holstein8th Oct 2008427th Nov 201726230th Mar 2019
13003Holstein4th Jan 201315th Dec 201725412th Feb 2019
14106Holstein26th Nov 2014126th Mar 20181431st Apr 2019
15044Holstein21th May 2015122th Oct 201729820th Feb 2019
J1404Jersey27th Feb 2014320th Feb 201817729th Jan 2019
J1405Jersey20th Mar 2014223th Dec 201723529th Dec 2018


HS indicators

1) Temperature-humidity index (THI)

To monitor the THI in the barn, a THI measuring device (Testo-174d, 5720500, Germany) was installed at three different locations within the barn. This device automatically recorded temperature and relative humidity, with measurements taken 12 times daily at 2-hour intervals. The THI was calculated using the following formula (Mader et al., 2006; Dikmen and Hansen, 2009). THI = 0.8 × temperature (℃) + [(relative humidity (%)/100) × (temperature (℃) - 14.4)] + 46.4.

2) Rectal temperature

Rectal temperature was taken concurrently with blood collection. To obtain the rectal temperature, any feces were cleared from the cow’s rectum. Using a rectal thermometer (POLYGREEN Co. Ltd., Germany), temperatures were manually recorded at 14:00 under both HS (THI: 86.29) and non-HS (THI: 60.87) conditions. For precision, each measurement was repeated three times per cow, with the thermometer inserted at a depth of over 15 cm into the rectum.

3) Milk yield measurement and body weight

Milk production and body weight were automatically recorded by a milking robot (Lely, Astronaut, Netherlands) during the milking process from June to October. The average daily gain (ADG) was calculated using the body weight data. To determine the relative average milk yield (RAMY), each cow’s milk production from June to October was compared to the average milk yield in May.

Statistical analysis

The quantitative data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m). Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 26.0 statistical software (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). To account for unequal sample sizes and variances, Welch’s t-test was used for pairwise comparisons, and Welch’s ANOVA was applied for comparisons across multiple groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, unless stated otherwise.

Blood collection

All cows were housed in a barn designed for natural ventilation. Daily THI values were calculated based on recorded air temperature and humidity, and the sampling date was selected when the daily minimum THI remained above 72 and the daily maximum THI stayed below 72 for over four weeks (Fig. 1). Whole blood samples were taken from the jugular vein of the same cows (Hol = 4, Jer = 2) during two distinct environmental seasons (summer and autumn) using PAXgene Blood RNA tubes (2.5 mL per cow; Qiagen, 762165, California, USA). The PAXgene Blood RNA tubes were stored at -80℃ until miRNA extraction.

Figure 1.Temperature-humidity index measured on dairy barn. The black line represents daily THI maximum and the grey line represents daily THI minimum. The tilted boxes represent THI on the day of sampling (modified from Lee et al. (2020)).

MiRNA-sequencing experiment and statistical analysis

MiRNAs were extracted from whole blood using the PAXgene Blood MicroRNA Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentrations of miRNAs were measured with a NanoDrop device (Optigen NANO Q, South Korea). miRNA integrity was evaluated using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), ensuring an RNA integrity number of 7 or higher. Library preparation involved adapter ligation, reverse transcription, PCR amplification, and pooled gel purification, performed with the Truseq Small RNA Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA). The library was then loaded into the Illumina Hiseq2000 sequencer, which contained millions of unique clusters. Raw sequencing reads of circulating miRNAs from all samples were pre-processed and analysed using miRDeep2 software. Adapter sequences added during the small RNA library construction were removed using Cutadapt v.1.9.1, and reads of at least 18 bp were collected to form clusters for increased accuracy. The processed and clustered reads were aligned with the Bos Taurus reference genome and further mapped to precursor and mature miRNAs from miRBase v21. miRDeep2 software was used to identify both known and novel miRNAs and estimate their expression levels. Differential gene expression analysis was conducted using the Limma voom v3.34.9 R package (Grimson et al., 2007; Robinson et al., 2010; Vejnar and Zdobnov, 2012). Prior to the analysis, genes with raw read counts were removed using the ‘filterByExpr’ function in the edgeR R package (Robinson et al., 2010). Then, TMM normalization was applied to standardize the size of each library using the ‘calcNormFactors’ function in edgeR. Subsequently, the ‘voom’ function in Limma was utilized to convert read counts into a logarithmic (base 2) scale for linear modeling. Differentially expressed (DE) genes between the two groups were identified using empirical Bayes and moderated t-test. A p-value < 0.01 and a logarithmic fold change (FC) of |logFC| > 2 were set as the criteria for significance.

Bioinformatics analysis

To predict target genes for DE miRNAs, miRmap (v1.2.0, mirmap.ezlab.org) databases were utilized (Vejnar and Zdobnov, 2012). Target genes were selected based on a miRmap Score of ≥ 80, provided by the respective programs, to ensure higher accuracy in the analysis. Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis was conducted using the PANTHER Classification System (v.19.0) (Mi et al., 2013) to determine the functional significance of the gene set. Additionally, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was performed by submitting the target gene list to DAVID Bioinformatics Resources (v2024q2) (Dennis et al., 2003) to identify enriched signalling pathways associated with these target genes.

RESULTS

Estimation of THI and blood collection

To estimate THI, we recorded the ambient temperature and relative humidity inside the barn daily (Fig. 1). Starting from the first week of July, the minimum THI exceeded 72, occasionally surpassing 80, indicating moderate to severe HS conditions (THI > 78) lasted for over one month. Both maximum and minimum THI values reached their highest around mid-August and then gradually declined; however, mild to moderate HS (THI 72-78) continued until the end of September. Whole blood samples were collected at 14:00 from both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows during the summer (HS) and autumn (non-HS). On sampling days, the THI ranged from 79.10 to 87.73 (14:00; 86.29) for HS and from 47.30 to 64.85 (14:00; 60.87) for non-HS. The minimum THI remained above 72 (the threshold for HS) for 36 consecutive days until HS sampling, while the maximum THI stayed below 72 for 28 days prior to non-HS sampling.

Effects of HS on physiological changes

We assessed physiological indicators of HS, including rectal temperature, milk yield, and ADG in lactating Holstein and Jersey cows. Rectal temperatures were recorded concurrently with blood collection. Under non-HS conditions, no significant differences were observed between Holstein (38.40℃ ± 0.07) and Jersey cows (37.80℃ ± 0.50). In contrast, during HS conditions, the rectal temperatures of Holstein cows (40.15℃ ± 0.17) were significantly higher than those of Jersey cows (38.95℃ ± 0.05, p = 0.0022, Fig. 2A).

Figure 2.Physiological indicators of heat stress recorded under environmental conditions in both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows (modified from Lee et al. (2020) for Holstein data). (A) Rectal temperature recorded on the day of sampling. (B) Relative average milk yield (RAMY) to May. (C) Average daily gain (ADG). Statistical significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

To assess the impact of HS on milk yield, we calculated the RAMY, defined as the ratio of the total milk yield for each month during the study period to the yield in May. Both Holstein and Jersey cows showed a gradual decline in RAMY, with a particularly significant drop observed in Holstein cows during the extreme heat of August. However, no differences in RAMY were observed across all months in Jersey cows. Recovery of RAMY was seen in September (Fig. 2B), suggesting that HS may have a more pronounced effect on the milk production of Holstein cows.

We also evaluated the influence of HS on growth performance by analysing changes in ADG for both Holstein and Jersey cows throughout the experimental period. As illustrated in Fig. 2C, ADG generally increased in both Holstein and Jersey cows, except in July, even though overall ADG during the summer was significantly lower.

Identification of DE miRNAs of HS cows

We performed small RNA sequencing on miRNAs isolated from whole blood to identify DE miRNAs between heat-stressed and non-heat-stressed Holstein and Jersey cows. In the lactating Holstein cows, 28 miRNAs showed significant differential expression (≥ 2-FC in the expression compared to non-HS controls; p < 0.05), including 10 upregulated and 18 downregulated miRNAs. In the Jersey cows, 38 DE miRNAs were identified (23 upregulated, 15 downregulated; ≥ 2-FC and p < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2. Differentially expressed microRNAs in Holstein and Jersey under heat stressed conditions (for the expression profile of Holstein cows, refer to the previous study (Lee et al., 2020).

BreedMature microRNARNA sequencing fold change (heat stress/non-heat stress) ≥ 2 (p < 0.05)
HolsteinFC value: up-regulation
Bta-miR-19a3.49
Bta-miR-19b3.34
Bta-miR-20b2.40
Bta-miR-29d-3p3.77
Bta-miR-106a2.25
Bta-miR-378d2.39
Bta-miR-4974.24
Bta-miR-502a2.46
Bta-miR-2285ad2.44
Bta-miR-2285o5.98
FC value: down-regulation
Bta-miR-30a-5p-4.44
Bta-miR-146b-2.08
Bta-miR-296-3p-2.11
Bta-miR-1246-9.49
Bta-miR-2284a-17.52
Bta-miR-2284aa-2.31
Bta-miR-2284ab-2.40
Bta-miR-2284b-3.61
Bta-miR-2284h-5p-8.05
Bta-miR-2284k-7.77
Bta-miR-2284r-2.82
Bta-miR-2284v-2.84
Bta-miR-2284w-2.69
Bta-miR-2284x-10.37
Bta-miR-2284y-9.95
Bta-miR-2284z-2.19
Bta-miR-2397-5p-2.08
Bta-miR-2457-2.15
JerseyFC value: up-regulation
Bta-let-7a-5p2.86
Bta-let-7c2.83
Bta-let-7e2.55
Bta-let-7f3.37
Bta-let-7g3.09
Bta-let-7i2.02
Bta-miR-1413.54
Bta-miR-1442.52
Bta-miR-148a2.25
Bta-miR-1584-3p4.40
Bta-miR-196b7.06
Bta-miR-20b3.63
Bta-miR-23362.44
Bta-miR-2419-3p8.48
Bta-miR-2450a3.55
Bta-miR-26b2.03
Bta-miR-3432a3.77
Bta-miR-411a3.74
JerseyBta-miR-42911.04
Bta-miR-4542.77
Bta-miR-785915.11
Bta-miR-9-5p3.06
Bta-miR-982.87
FC value: down-regulation
Bta-miR-1246-4.43
Bta-miR-133a-4.06
Bta-miR-1343-3p-2.08
Bta-miR-151-3p-2.49
Bta-miR-1843-3.90
Bta-miR-191-2.19
Bta-miR-204-2.08
Bta-miR-2284x-2.11
Bta-miR-2284y-2.06
Bta-miR-2332-5.20
Bta-miR-2389-3.11
Bta-miR-2394-4.08
Bta-miR-2419-5p-2.15
Bta-miR-2453-8.03
Bta-miR-324-3.35


Additionally, we examined the profiles of 11 candidate DE miRNAs identified in a previous study conducted on Holstein cows to validate their expression in Jersey cows (Lee et al., 2020). The expression patterns (up / downregulation) in Jersey cows were consistent with those observed in Holstein cows; however, the expression levels (|HS/NJS|) in Jersey cows were lower, and no significant differences were found 9 of the DE miRNAs, except for bta-miR-2284x and bta-miR-2284y (p > 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3. Comparison of expression profiles of candidate circulating microRNA biomarkers related to heat stress (identified in a previous study; Lee et al., 2020) in lactating Holstein and Jersey cows.

miRNAHolsteinJersey


Fold change (heat stress/non-heat stress)p-valueFold change (heat stress/non-heat stress)p-value
Bta-miR-19a3.49< 0.051.800.26
Bta-miR-19b3.34< 0.052.070.11
Bta-miR-30a-5p-4.44< 0.05-1.920.07
Bta-miR-2284a-17.52< 0.05-1.850.74
Bta-miR-2284b-3.61< 0.05-2.740.08
Bta-miR-2284h-5p-8.05< 0.05-2.600.06
Bta-miR-2284k-7.77< 0.05-1.260.83
Bta-miR-2284v-2.84< 0.05-1.920.10
Bta-miR-2284w-2.69< 0.05-1.560.20
Bta-miR-2284x-10.37< 0.05-2.110.04
Bta-miR-2284y-9.95< 0.05-2.060.04


Putative target gene and signalling pathway analysis

In a previous study on lactating Holstein cows, we identified 2,798 potential target genes for 28 DE miRNAs using miRmap and TargetScan. In this study, we identified 6,108 potential target genes for 38 DE miRNAs in lactating Jersey cows using miRmap. Additionally, we investigated the potential target genes of 4 common DE miRNAs using miRmap and identified 500 genes. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using DAVID and PANTHER. The GSEA results indicated that these predicted target genes were linked to the corpus luteum function and progesterone biosynthesis and numerous genes also involved in the immune responses (Table 4). Additionally, KEGG pathway analysis revealed 9 statistically significant pathways (Table 5). Notably, pathways such as the metabolic pathway, Fanconi anemia pathway and FoxO signaling pathway were found to be closely associated with the HS response.

Table 4. Predicted target genes related to heat stress responses of microRNAs differentially expressed in Holstein and Jersey cows.

DE miRNADirection of gene regulationTarget genesResponses
Bta-miR-20bDownXCL1, CCL1Improvement of corpus luteum function
Bta-miR-1246UpStARProgesterone biosynthesis
Bta-miR-2284xUpNumerous genes involved in the immune responses (data are not shown)
Bta-miR-2284yUpNumerous genes involved in the immune responses (data are not shown)

DE miRNAs, differentially expressed miRNAs..


Table 5. KEGG pathways enriched for targets of differentially expressed miRNAs in Holstein and Jersey cows.

TermNumber of genesp-value
bta01100: Metabolic pathways510.0055
bta04144: Endocytosis120.019
bta03460: Fanconi anemia pathway50.025
bta04068: FoxO signaling pathway80.026
bta00600: Sphingolipid metabolism50.036
bta05210: Colorectal cancer60.048
bta05226: Gastric cancer80.049
bta05167: Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection100.049
bta04520: Adherens junction60.050

DISCUSSION

The THI is commonly utilized as a measure to evaluate the intensity of HS in livestock, as an accurate and reliable estimation of heat load can help reduce or prevent economic losses, including reduced reproductive efficiency and decreased milk production in dairy cattle (Bohmanova et al., 2007; Habeeb et al., 2018). THI values are categorized into five distinct levels: no HS (THI < 72), mild HS (72 ≤ THI ≤ 78), moderate HS (78 < THI < 89), severe HS (89 ≤ THI ≤ 98), and extreme HS that can lead to mortality (THI > 98) (Armstrong, 1994; Dash et al., 2016). THI values are categorized into five distinct levels: no HS (THI < 72), mild HS (72 ≤ THI ≤ 78), moderate HS (78 < THI < 89), severe HS (89 ≤ THI ≤ 98), and extreme HS that can lead to mortality (THI > 98) (Armstrong, 1994; Dash et al., 2016). To determine if the cows were experiencing HS, we analysed the relationship between THI and physiological parameters such as milk yield and ADG. Blood samples were collected during a period when mild HS persisted for more than a month (specifically 36 days), during which both milk yield and ADG declined. Control samples (non-HS) were obtained four weeks after the minimum THI had stabilized below 72, indicating that cows subjected to HS can fully recover from prolonged HS, as evidenced by improved milk yield and ADG.

It is noteworthy that the significant reduction in milk production observed in Holstein and Jersey cows during the summer may be partly attributed to decreased feed intake. The more pronounced decline in milk yield in Holstein cows compared to Jersey cows is consistent with previous findings suggesting that Jersey cows may be more resilient to high temperatures (Roche, 2003; Smith et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2023). The feed intake was indirectly assessed using ADG. In this study, the negative ADG observed in HS cows suggests that HS may indirectly lead to reduced feed intake and appetite, ultimately causing weight loss. All lactating Holstein and Jersey cows used in this study were pregnant, and the substantial increase in ADG observed from September, after the summer period, could be attributed to compensatory placental growth driven by increased feed intake (Lee et al., 2020). Consistent with earlier research that demonstrated a positive correlation between rectal temperature and THI values (Dikmen and Hansen, 2009; Lee et al., 2020), and differences in rectal temperature according to breed (Muller and Botha, 1993), our findings also showed that Jersey cows had lower rectal temperatures compared to Holstein cows, indicating that Jersey cows are more resilient to HS. These physiological indicators confirm that Holstein cows exhibit greater sensitivity to thermal stress compared to Jersey cows.

To gain deeper insights into the relationship between these physiological markers, biological processes, and cellular responses to HS, we conducted RNA-sequencing analysis to identify DE miRNAs. An in silico method was utilized for miRNA target prediction, as circulating miRNAs in body fluids are known to influence various biological processes and could serve as potential biomarkers for the HS response. We examined 4 DE miRNAs that were commonly expressed in both Holstein and Jersey cows under HS conditions (Table 4). Interestingly, bioinformatics analysis indicated that these miRNAs are predicted to target genes involved in corpus luteum function, including progesterone biosynthesis. In our previous studies, the upregulated bta-miR-20b was found to target XCL1 (Lee et al., 2020), while the downregulated bta-miR-1246 targets StAR, a key gene involved in progesterone biosynthesis. Additionally, downregulated bta-miR-2284x and 2284y which are ruminant specific miRNAs have been reported to target numerous genes related to the immune response (Lee et al., 2020). Although we did not measure progesterone levels in this study, previous research has reported controversial findings regarding plasma progesterone levels under HS conditions (Wolfenson et al., 2000). Some studies have observed a decline in plasma progesterone levels during HS (Wise et al., 1988b; Wolfenson et al., 1988), while others have found no significant change or even an increase in progesterone levels (Thatcher and Roman-Ponce, 1981; Wise et al., 1988a). These variations can be attributed to several factors, such as the potential release of progesterone from the adrenal glands, hepatic metabolism, changes in blood volume (haemodilution or haemoconcentration), the severity and type of heat exposure (acute vs. chronic), as well as the age of cows, lactation stage, and feeding regimen, all of which influence the observed effects of HS on plasma progesterone levels (Jonsson et al., 1997; Trout et al., 1998).

Using an integrative approach with predicted target genes of DE miRNAs and DAVID, several KEGG pathways were identified, including metabolic pathways, Fanconi anemia pathway, FoxO signaling pathway, Sphingolipid metabolism associated with HS. The Fanconi anemia pathway is essential for recovering from HS by repairing DNA damage resulting from the overproduction of ROS in high-temperature environment (Yoshimoto et al., 2012; Kupfer, 2013; Li et al., 2024). The FoxO signaling pathway plays a crucial role in the transcriptional activation of heat shock proteins under HS conditions (Donovan and Marr, 2016; Farhan et al., 2017). We also found that the sphingolipid metabolism pathway is affected by HS, which can influence protein metabolism and subsequently impact growth performance in mammals (Liu et al., 2022).

Finally, when comparing the 11 potential miRNA biomarkers identified in Holstein cows from our previous study with those in Jersey cows, we found that although the expression trends (up / down) were similar to those observed in Holstein cows, the expression levels in Jersey cows were not statistically significant, and the magnitude of expression changes (|FC|) was lower compared to Holstein cows (Table 3) (Lee et al., 2020). This suggests that Jersey cows may have greater resilience to HS compared to Holstein cows, supporting findings from previous studies (Lee et al., 2023). The findings of this study are limited by the small dataset and the lack of functional validation of the roles of DE miRNAs in Holstein and Jersey cows. Therefore, further studies are needed to verify our results using a larger population and to investigate the specific roles of each DE miRNA under controlled environmental conditions.

CONCLUSION

We evaluated physiological HS indicators, including rectal temperature, milk production, and ADG in both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows, revealing that Holstein cows are more susceptible to HS conditions. RNA-sequencing-based transcriptome analysis of miRNAs identified 4 DE miRNAs (bta-miR-20b, bta-miR-1246, bta-miR-2284x and bta-miR-2284y) in both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows (|FC| ≥ 2, p < 0,05). Among these, bta-miR-20b, which is upregulated under HS, and bta-miR-1246, which is downregulated, were found to target several genes associated with corpus luteum function and progesterone biosynthesis. The remaining miRNAs, bta-miR-2284x and 2284y, were shown to be related to immune response. Furthermore, when we compared the expression levels of 11 potential HS biomarkers previously identified in lactating Holstein cows to those in lactating Jersey cows, the expression trends (up / down) were similar, but the magnitude of expression changes (|FC|) was lower in Jersey compared to Holstein cows. These findings suggest that Jersey cows may have greater resilience to HS.

Acknowledgements

None.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.L., I.C.; data curation, J.L.; formal analysis, J.L.; investigation, J.L.; methodology, J.L., B.L., I.C.; project administration, J.L., T.C., S.K.; resources, J.L., D.K., G.R., H.B., J.K., S.H.; supervision, S.L., T.C., I.C.; writing - original draft, J.L.; writing - review & editing, J.L., I.C.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute of Animal Science, Project (PJ015006), with the goal of improving productivity and sustainability in the dairy sector through innovative research and development efforts.

Ethical Approval

All animal experimental protocols and procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Ethics Committee of the National Institute of Animal Science, South Korea (approval number: NIAS-068).

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.Temperature-humidity index measured on dairy barn. The black line represents daily THI maximum and the grey line represents daily THI minimum. The tilted boxes represent THI on the day of sampling (modified from Lee et al. (2020)).
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2024; 39: 221-232https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.39.4.221

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Physiological indicators of heat stress recorded under environmental conditions in both lactating Holstein and Jersey cows (modified from Lee et al. (2020) for Holstein data). (A) Rectal temperature recorded on the day of sampling. (B) Relative average milk yield (RAMY) to May. (C) Average daily gain (ADG). Statistical significance: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2024; 39: 221-232https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.39.4.221

Table 1 . Information on each cow used in this experiment.

Individual IDBreedBirth dateParityPrevious calving dateMilking days (as of 15th Aug)Expected calving date
08120Holstein8th Oct 2008427th Nov 201726230th Mar 2019
13003Holstein4th Jan 201315th Dec 201725412th Feb 2019
14106Holstein26th Nov 2014126th Mar 20181431st Apr 2019
15044Holstein21th May 2015122th Oct 201729820th Feb 2019
J1404Jersey27th Feb 2014320th Feb 201817729th Jan 2019
J1405Jersey20th Mar 2014223th Dec 201723529th Dec 2018

Table 2 . Differentially expressed microRNAs in Holstein and Jersey under heat stressed conditions (for the expression profile of Holstein cows, refer to the previous study (Lee et al., 2020).

BreedMature microRNARNA sequencing fold change (heat stress/non-heat stress) ≥ 2 (p < 0.05)
HolsteinFC value: up-regulation
Bta-miR-19a3.49
Bta-miR-19b3.34
Bta-miR-20b2.40
Bta-miR-29d-3p3.77
Bta-miR-106a2.25
Bta-miR-378d2.39
Bta-miR-4974.24
Bta-miR-502a2.46
Bta-miR-2285ad2.44
Bta-miR-2285o5.98
FC value: down-regulation
Bta-miR-30a-5p-4.44
Bta-miR-146b-2.08
Bta-miR-296-3p-2.11
Bta-miR-1246-9.49
Bta-miR-2284a-17.52
Bta-miR-2284aa-2.31
Bta-miR-2284ab-2.40
Bta-miR-2284b-3.61
Bta-miR-2284h-5p-8.05
Bta-miR-2284k-7.77
Bta-miR-2284r-2.82
Bta-miR-2284v-2.84
Bta-miR-2284w-2.69
Bta-miR-2284x-10.37
Bta-miR-2284y-9.95
Bta-miR-2284z-2.19
Bta-miR-2397-5p-2.08
Bta-miR-2457-2.15
JerseyFC value: up-regulation
Bta-let-7a-5p2.86
Bta-let-7c2.83
Bta-let-7e2.55
Bta-let-7f3.37
Bta-let-7g3.09
Bta-let-7i2.02
Bta-miR-1413.54
Bta-miR-1442.52
Bta-miR-148a2.25
Bta-miR-1584-3p4.40
Bta-miR-196b7.06
Bta-miR-20b3.63
Bta-miR-23362.44
Bta-miR-2419-3p8.48
Bta-miR-2450a3.55
Bta-miR-26b2.03
Bta-miR-3432a3.77
Bta-miR-411a3.74
JerseyBta-miR-42911.04
Bta-miR-4542.77
Bta-miR-785915.11
Bta-miR-9-5p3.06
Bta-miR-982.87
FC value: down-regulation
Bta-miR-1246-4.43
Bta-miR-133a-4.06
Bta-miR-1343-3p-2.08
Bta-miR-151-3p-2.49
Bta-miR-1843-3.90
Bta-miR-191-2.19
Bta-miR-204-2.08
Bta-miR-2284x-2.11
Bta-miR-2284y-2.06
Bta-miR-2332-5.20
Bta-miR-2389-3.11
Bta-miR-2394-4.08
Bta-miR-2419-5p-2.15
Bta-miR-2453-8.03
Bta-miR-324-3.35

Table 3 . Comparison of expression profiles of candidate circulating microRNA biomarkers related to heat stress (identified in a previous study; Lee et al., 2020) in lactating Holstein and Jersey cows.

miRNAHolsteinJersey


Fold change (heat stress/non-heat stress)p-valueFold change (heat stress/non-heat stress)p-value
Bta-miR-19a3.49< 0.051.800.26
Bta-miR-19b3.34< 0.052.070.11
Bta-miR-30a-5p-4.44< 0.05-1.920.07
Bta-miR-2284a-17.52< 0.05-1.850.74
Bta-miR-2284b-3.61< 0.05-2.740.08
Bta-miR-2284h-5p-8.05< 0.05-2.600.06
Bta-miR-2284k-7.77< 0.05-1.260.83
Bta-miR-2284v-2.84< 0.05-1.920.10
Bta-miR-2284w-2.69< 0.05-1.560.20
Bta-miR-2284x-10.37< 0.05-2.110.04
Bta-miR-2284y-9.95< 0.05-2.060.04

Table 4 . Predicted target genes related to heat stress responses of microRNAs differentially expressed in Holstein and Jersey cows.

DE miRNADirection of gene regulationTarget genesResponses
Bta-miR-20bDownXCL1, CCL1Improvement of corpus luteum function
Bta-miR-1246UpStARProgesterone biosynthesis
Bta-miR-2284xUpNumerous genes involved in the immune responses (data are not shown)
Bta-miR-2284yUpNumerous genes involved in the immune responses (data are not shown)

DE miRNAs, differentially expressed miRNAs..


Table 5 . KEGG pathways enriched for targets of differentially expressed miRNAs in Holstein and Jersey cows.

TermNumber of genesp-value
bta01100: Metabolic pathways510.0055
bta04144: Endocytosis120.019
bta03460: Fanconi anemia pathway50.025
bta04068: FoxO signaling pathway80.026
bta00600: Sphingolipid metabolism50.036
bta05210: Colorectal cancer60.048
bta05226: Gastric cancer80.049
bta05167: Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection100.049
bta04520: Adherens junction60.050

References

  1. Armstrong DV. 1994. Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2044-2050.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  2. Baumgard LH, Rhoads RP, Rhoads ML, Gabler NK, Ross JW, Keating AF, Boddicker RL, Sejian V. 2012. Environmental Stress and Amelioration in Livestock Production. In: . Springer, Berlin, pp. 413-468.
    CrossRef
  3. Bohmanova J, Cole JB. 2007. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1947-1956.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding (CDCB). 2020. Summary of 2020 DHI herd averages: DHI report K-3. CDCB. [Retrieved September 29, 2024]. from https://queries.uscdcb.com/publish/dhi/dhi21/haall.html.
  5. Dash S, Chakravarty AK, Singh A, Upadhyay A, Yousuf S. 2016. Effect of heat stress on reproductive performances of dairy cattle and buffaloes: a review. Vet. World 9:235-244.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Dennis G Jr, Sherman BT, Hosack DA, Yang J, Gao W, Lempicki RA. 2003. DAVID: database for annotation, visualization, and integrated discovery. Genome Biol. 4:P3.
    CrossRef
  7. Dikmen S and Hansen PJ. 2009. Is the temperature-humidity index the best indicator of heat stress in lactating dairy cows in a subtropical environment? J. Dairy Sci. 92:109-116.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Donovan MR and Marr MT 2nd. 2016. dFOXO activates large and small heat shock protein genes in response to oxidative stress to maintain proteostasis in Drosophila. J. Biol. Chem. 291:19042-19050.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  9. Farhan M, Wang H, Gaur U, Little PJ, Zheng W. 2017. FOXO signaling pathways as therapeutic targets in cancer. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 13:815-827.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Grimson A, Farh KK, Johnston WK, Garrett-Engele P, Bartel DP. 2007. MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol. Cell. 27:91-105.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  11. Ha M and Kim VN. 2014. Regulation of microRNA biogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:509-524.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Habeeb AA, Atta MA. 2018. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators to heat stress of climatic conditions with relation to production and reproduction of farm animals. Int. J. Biotechnol. Recent Adv. 1:35-50.
    CrossRef
  13. Hansen PJ. 2019. Reproductive physiology of the heat-stressed dairy cow: implications for fertility and assisted reproduction. Anim. Reprod. 16:497-507.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. Hunter MP, Ismail N, Zhang X, Aguda BD, Lee EJ, Yu L, Xiao T, Schafer J, Lee ML, Schmittgen TD, Nana-Sinkam SP, Marsh CB. 2008. Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PLoS One 3:e3694.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  15. Ioannidis J and Donadeu FX. 2016. Circulating microRNA profiles during the bovine oestrous cycle. PLoS One 11:e0158160.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  16. Ioannidis J and Donadeu FX. 2017. Changes in circulating microRNA levels can be identified as early as day 8 of pregnancy in cattle. PLoS One 12:e0174892.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  17. Ioannidis J, Sánchez-Molano E, Psifidi A, Banos G. 2018. Association of plasma microRNA expression with age, genetic background and functional traits in dairy cattle. Sci. Rep. 8:12955.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  18. Jonsson NN, McGowan MR, McGuigan K, Davison TM, Hussain AM, Matschoss A. 1997. Relationships among calving season, heat load, energy balance and postpartum ovulation of dairy cows in a subtropical environment. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 47:315-326.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Jurkovich V, Somoskői B, Bakony M. 2023. The effects of heat stress in Jersey, Hungarian Simmental and Holstein-Friesian cows. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 32:68-75.
    CrossRef
  20. Kim VN, Siomi MC. 2009. Biogenesis of small RNAs in animals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:126-139.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  21. Kim VN and Nam JW. 2006. Genomics of microRNA. Trends Genet. 22:165-173.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. KTimes. 2024. Korea sees highest average summer temperature on record. The Korea Times. https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2024/12/371_381933.html.
  23. Kupfer GM. 2013. Fanconi anemia: a signal transduction and DNA repair pathway. Yale J. Biol. Med. 86:491-497.
  24. Lee J, Kim D, Son J, Kim D, Jeon E, Jung D, Han M, Ha S, Choi I. 2023. Effects of heat stress on conception in Holstein and Jersey cattle and oocyte maturation in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 65:324-335.
    CrossRef
  25. Lee J, Lee S, Ryu G, Kim D, Baek HU, Kim J, Lee K, Kim S, Kim S, Dang CG, Choi I. 2024. A retrospective analysis of conception per embryo transfer in dairy cattle in South Korea. Theriogenology 226:363-368.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  26. Lee J, Lee S, Son J, Lim H, Kim E, Kim D, Ha S, Hur T, Choi I. 2020. Analysis of circulating-microRNA expression in lactating Holstein cows under summer heat stress. PLoS One 15:e0231125.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  27. Li J, Duan Y, Kong W, Gao H, Fu S, Li H, Zhou Y, Liu H, Zhou C. 2024. Heat stress affects swimming performance and induces biochemical, structural, and transcriptional changes in the heart of Gymnocypris eckloni. Aquacult. Rep. 35:101998.
    CrossRef
  28. Liu H, Zhang B, Li F, Liu L, Yang T, Li F. 2022. Effects of heat stress on growth performance, carcass traits, serum metabolism, and intestinal microflora of meat rabbits. Front Microbiol. 13:998095.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  29. Liu J, Li L, Chen X, Wang D. 2019. Effects of heat stress on body temperature, milk production, and reproduction in dairy cows: a novel idea for monitoring and evaluation of heat stress-a review. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 32:1332-1339.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  30. Mader TL, Brown-Brandl T. 2006. Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 84:712-719.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Mi H, Thomas PD. 2013. PANTHER in 2013: modeling the evolution of gene function, and other gene attributes, in the context of phylogenetic trees. Nucleic. Acids Res. 41:D377-D386.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Muller CJC and Botha JA. 1993. Effect of summer climatic conditions on different heat tolerance indicators in primiparous Friesian and Jersey cows. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 23:98-103.
  33. National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed, The National Academies Press, Washington.
  34. Nebel RL, Jobst SM, Dransfield MBG, Bailey TL. 1997. Use of radio frequency data communication system, HeatWatch®, to describe behavioral estrus in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 80(Suppl 1:179.
  35. Norman HD, Guinan FL, Dürr JW. 2020. Reproductive status of cows in Dairy Herd Improvement programs and bred using artificial insemination (2020). Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding. [Retrieved September 29, 2024]. from https://queries.uscdcb.com/publish/dhi/current/reproall.html.
  36. Norman HD, Wright JR, Hubbard SM, Hutchison JL. 2009. Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 92:3517-3528.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  37. Pragna P, Archana PR, Aleena J, Sejian V, Krishnan G, Bagath M, Manimaran A, Beena V, Kurien EK, Bhatta R. 2017. Heat stress and dairy cow: impact on both milk yield and composition. Int. J. Dairy Sci. 12:1-11.
    CrossRef
  38. Putney DJ, Thatcher WW. 1989. Influence of summer heat stress on pregnancy rates of lactating dairy cattle following embryo transfer or artificial insemination. Theriogenology 31:765-778.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  39. Reid G, van Zandwijk N. 2011. Circulating microRNAs: association with disease and potential use as biomarkers. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 80:193-208.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  40. Robinson MD, Smyth GK. 2010. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26:139-140.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  41. Roche JR. 2003. Effect of pregnancy on milk production and bodyweight from identical twin study. J. Dairy Sci. 86:777-783.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  42. Roth C, Rack B, Müller V, Janni W, Schwarzenbach H. 2010. Circulating microRNAs as blood-based markers for patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 12:R90.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  43. Roth Z. 2020. Influence of heat stress on reproduction in dairy cows-physiological and practical aspects. J. Anim. Sci. 98(Suppl 1:S80-S87.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  44. Smith DL, Smith T, Ward SH. 2013. Short communication: comparison of the effects of heat stress on milk and component yields and somatic cell score in Holstein and Jersey cows. J. Dairy Sci. 96:3028-3033.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  45. Sørensen AE, Wissing ML, Salö S, Dalgaard LT. 2014. MicroRNAs related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Genes (Basel) 5:684-708.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  46. Tao S, Dahl GE, Laporta J, Bernard JK, Marins TN. 2019. PHYSIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: effects of heat stress during late gestation on the dam and its calf12. J. Anim. Sci. 97:2245-2257.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  47. Thatcher WW and Roman-Ponce H. 1981. Effects of climate on bovine reproduction. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 301-309.
  48. Trout JP, Hansen PJ. 1998. Characteristics of the estrous cycle and antioxidant status of lactating Holstein cows exposed to heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 81:1244-1250.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  49. Turchinovich A, Weiz L, Burwinkel B. 2011. Characterization of extracellular circulating microRNA. Nucleic. Acids Res. 39:7223-7233.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  50. Valadi H, Ekström K, Bossios A, Sjöstrand M, Lötvall JO. 2007. Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:654-659.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  51. Vejnar CE and Zdobnov EM. 2012. MiRmap: comprehensive prediction of microRNA target repression strength. Nucleic. Acids Res. 40:11673-11683.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  52. West JW. 1999. Nutritional strategies for managing the heat-stressed dairy cow. J. Anim. Sci. 77(Suppl 2):21-35.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  53. Wiggans GR. 2000. USDA summary of 2000 herd averages. [Retrived September 29, 2024]. from https://queries.uscdcb.com/publish/dhi/dhi01/k3.shtml.
  54. Wise ME, Armstrong DV, Huber JT, Wiersma F. 1988a. Hormonal alterations in the lactating dairy cow in response to thermal stress. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2480-2485.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  55. Wise ME, Rodriguez RE, Armstrong DV, Huber JT, Hunter R. 1988b. Fertility and hormonal responses to temporary relief of heat stress in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 29:1027-1035.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  56. Witwer KW. 2015. Circulating microRNA biomarker studies: pitfalls and potential solutions. Clin. Chem. 61:56-63.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  57. Wolfenson D, Berman A. 1988. Hyperthermia and body energy store effects on estrous behavior, conception rate, and corpus luteum function in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 71:3497-3504.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  58. Wolfenson D and Roth Z. 2018. Impact of heat stress on cow reproduction and fertility. Anim. Front. 9:32-38.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  59. Wolfenson D, Meidan R. 2000. Impaired reproduction in heat-stressed cattle: basic and applied aspects. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 60-61:535-547.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  60. Yoshimoto K, Mizoguchi M, Hata N, Murata H, Hatae R, Amano T, Sasaki T. 2012. Complex DNA repair pathways as possible therapeutic targets to overcome temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. Front. Oncol. 2:186.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef

JARB Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotehnology

qr code

OPEN ACCESS pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663