JARB Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotehnology

OPEN ACCESS pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663

Article Search

ARTICLE

Article ARTICLE
Split Viewer

Journal of Embryo Transfer 2014; 29(2): 171-175

Published online June 30, 2014

https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.2.171

Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.

Effects of Periparturient Anthelmintic Treatment on the Milk Yield in Cows

Md. Faruk Islam1,†, Begum Fatema Zohara1, Nurjahan Begum2, and Md. Golam Shahi Alam3

1Department of Medicine, Surgery and Obstetrics, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh,
2Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh,
3Department of Surgery and Obstetrics Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.

Correspondence to: Correspondence : faruk_vet@yahool.com

Received: February 10, 2014; Revised: March 22, 2014; Accepted: April 20, 2014

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal parasitic infestation in periparturient dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and quality. Sixty pregnant cows of 1st & 2nd parity were divided into four groups. The efficacy of anthelmintic treatment was evaluated by counting faecal egg per gram (EPG) compared with pre-treatment values. The milk yield of each cow was recorded in pre and post treatment lactations. Cows of group A were treated with Nitroxynil 10 mg/kg body weight subcutaneously 30 days before parturition, group B were treated with combination of triclabendazole and levamisole 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at calving and group C treated with Endex® at calving and 42 days after. The mean change in EPG 14 days after treatment was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated (79.1%) cows than control. Average milk yield of group C (2.8 ± 0.8) was significantly higher (p<0.01) than group A (2.6 ± 0.7). Similarly, the average milk yield in all the treated cows was significantly (p<0.01) higher in treated lactation (2.5 ± 0.7) than in the previous lactation (2.2 ± 0.7). The average milk yield in all treated cows was significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control cows. Although, milk yields were higher in second parity than the first, there was no significant difference (p>0.05). The milk protein percentage was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated group than the control group. Therefore, it may be concluded that periparturient anthelmintic treatment effectively reduced the gastrointestinal parasitic load and improved milk yield.

Keywords: cows, periparturient anthelmintics, milk yield, milk components, Bangladesh

Cattle farming provide 39% of employment in agriculture sector, and 15% of total employment in the national economy. In Bangladesh, 20 million households keep 23 million of cattle heads under traditional farming system. The productivity of the animal with regard to fertility and milk yield is low. Domestic productions supplying 99% of market milk in Bangladesh. Total milk production of the country from cattle and buffaloes are 770,000 and 2,400 Metric ton respectively (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 1999, 2003). Dairy milk production is only 14% of the minimum requirement (28 g/day). Milk availability per caput is approximately 30 g per day against 250 g. The average daily milk yield is ranges from 1.5 liter to 2.46 liter in indigenous cow (Alam et al., 2009, Kabir et al., 2009) and 2.1 liter to 12 liter in different crossbred type (Kabir et al., 2009, Mondal et al., 2005). Along with other constrains, parasitic infestation interrupts production potential of dairy cows in Bangladesh (Jabbar and Green, 1983). Parasitism results in a reduced nutrient supply to the host through voluntary reductions in food intake and reduced food efficiency and it has major detrimental effects on the efficiency of production of ruminants through losses up of to 50% are not uncommon. Deworming strategy can reduce the occurrence parasitic infestation and economic loss to ensure the continued production of milk. There is no comprehensive precise data are available on the effects of parasitism on milk yield in dairy cows of Bangladesh. This study was conducted to improve the quantity and quality of milk production through anthelmintic treatment during periparturient period in cows.

Selection and Management of Animals

This study was carried out into the Bangladesh Agricultural University and Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science Technology University dairy farms and other areas of Belkuchi Upazila (Sub-district) in Sirajganj district and also in the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, BAU, Mymensing and the Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, HSTU, Dinajpur. The study were done from July 2011 to June 2013 on 60 multiparous mixed breed pregnant cows of first and second parity selected from Bangladesh Agricultural University Dairy farm (n=16), Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science & Technology University Dairy farm (n=19) and char island area (n=25) of Belkuchi Upazila (sub distrct) in Sirajganj district. The selected pregnant animals used only for dairy purpose during the study period. The animals were 5∼7 years old and on an average 125 to 172 kg body weight and all the animals were maintained under traditional farm condition of Bangladesh. All the animals were kept under the same managemental conditions. Rice straw was the staple feed for the cows and green grasses were available depending on the season. The calves were tied or tethered at the night and allow to free access or suckling to their dam during the whole day. The cows were milked once a day and only in the morning.

Grouping of Experimental Animals

A total of 60 mixed breed pregnant cows naturally infested with gastrointestinal parasites were selected from the three study areas for comparative stability trials of anthelmintics and their effects on milk quantity and quality. Cows were divided into four groups, A (n=18), B (n=14), C (n=16) and D (n=12). All cows of group A were treated with Nitroxynil (Dovenix®, MERIAL-17, Bourgelat 69002 Lyon-France) at the rate of 10 mg/kg body weight subcutaneously 30 days before parturition was due. Cows of group B were treated with triclabendazole and levamisole (Endex®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bangladesh) at the rate of 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at calving. Cows in group C were treated with triclabendazole and levamisole (Endex®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bangladesh) at the rate of 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at calving and 42 days after. Cows of group D were kept as untreated infected control.

Collection and Examination of Fecal Sample

Fecal samples were collected from freshly devoided faces or directly from the rectum of each experimental cow. Samples were collected in the morning for the evaluation of pre and post treatment egg load. Firstly the samples were examined for qualitative purpose by direct smear method and if the samples were positive then quantitative determination of helminthes egg was made by McMaster method as described by Rahman et al. (1996).

The efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal nematodiasis in dairy cows was based on the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). The faecal samples were collected and examined before and after treatment at 7th and 14th day and EPG of faeces of each cow was recorded.

Collection and Examination of Milk Sample

Milk samples were collected from each cow once a month and analyzed for the percentage of milk fat, protein, lactose, solid not fat (SNF) and minerals. The milk compositions were analyzed by using the automated milk composition analyzer (MILKOTESTER®, Milk analyzing device, Model: MINI 3, Milkotester Ltd. BULGARIA).

Data Collection on Milk Yield

The daily milk yield by individual cow was recorded in liter to find out the total lactation yield during the study period.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed for descriptive statistics (i.e. means, frequencies) using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 17.0) computer program. The SPSS package was used for performing t-test, for comparing the variables.

The efficacy of anthelmintic treatment at different stages of periparturient periods have been presented in Table 1. The cows of group A which were naturally infested with gastrointestinal nematode parasites treated with Nitroxynil at the rate of 10 mg/kg body weight subcutaneously 30 days before parturition was due. It showed the average EPG reduced from 506.1 ± 172.3 to 157.8 ± 24.9 and the percentage of EPG reduction was 68.97 on 14th day of post treatment i.e. efficacy of Nitroxynil was 68.97%. The cows of group B were treated with combination of triclabendazole and levamisole at the rate of 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at single dose during calving, where the average EPG reduced from 967.7 ± 237.1 to 172.0 ± 25.9 and the percentage of EPG reduction was 79.02 i.e.

Table 1 .. Efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal parasites in dairy cows

GroupsDrugs with dosePre-treatment EPG (Mean ± SD)Post-treatment EPG (Mean ± SD)% of EPG reduction on 14th dayP-value

A (n=18)Nitroxynil (Dovinix®) (1 ml/25 kg)506.11 ± 172.25157.78 ± 24.8668.970.01
B (n=14)Levamisol & Triclabendazol (Endex®) (19.5 mg/kgbwt.) at calving794.60 ± 310.5166.70 ± 26.279.020.01
C (n=16)Levamisol & Triclabendazol (Endex®) (19.5mg/kgbwt.) at calving + 42 days after967.67 ± 237.09172.00 ± 25.9182.210.01
D (n=12)Control (untreated)791.67 ± 268.52864.17 ± 290.71‒ 9.220.976
Over all treatedAnthelmintics794.58 ± 310.49166.67 ± 26.2079.090.01

efficacy of triclabendazole and levamisole was 79.02%. The cows of group C were treated with combination of triclabendazole and levamisole at the rate of 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at double doses during calving and 42 days after, showed the average EPG fell from 794.6 ± 310.5 to 166.7 ± 26.2 and the percentage of EPG reduction was 82.21 i.e. efficacy of triclabendazole and levamisole was 82.21%. Whereas cows of group D (untreated control group), showed increased EPG from 791.7 ± 268.5 to 864.2 ± 290.7 i.e. on 14th day of post-treatment increased EPG was 9.22%. The mean change in EPG 14 days after treatment was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated (79.1%) cows than control (9.2%).

The average daily milk yield of all groups was shown in Table 2. The milk yield were in group A, B, C and D in lactations previous and treated lactation was 2.3 ± 0.7, 2.6 ± 0.7; 2.5 ± 0.8, 2.7 ± 0.9; 2.1 ± 0.6, 2.8 ± 0.8 and 2.2 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 0.8 litres, respectively. Average milk yield of all treated groups was significantly higher (p<0.01) in treated lactation than the previous lactation.

Table 2 .. Average daily milk yield (lit./cow) of all cows

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

A (n=18)2.3 ± 0.72.6 ± 0.70.01
B (n=14)2.5 ± 0.82.7 ± 0.90.01
C (n=16)2.1 ± 0.62.8 ± 0.80.01
D (n=12)2.2 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.8NS

NS = not significant.


Table 3 shows the average milk yield in treated cows was significantly (p<0.01) higher in treated lactation (2.5 ± 0.7) than the previous lactation (2.2 ± 0.7) and similarly average milk yield was significantly (p<0.01) higher in treated group (2.5 ± 0.7) than the control group (2.2 ± 0.8).

Table 3 .. The milk yield difference between two lactations

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

Treated (n=48)2.2 ± 0.72.5 ± 0.70.01
Control (n=12)2.2 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.8NS

Although, milk yields were higher in second parity (2.5 ± 0.7) than the first (2.4 ± 0.7), there was no significant (p>0.05) difference (Table 4).

Table 4 .. The milk yield of cow in different parities

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

12.2 ± 0.72.4 ± 0.7NS
22.4 ± 0.72.5 ± 0.7

NS = not significant.


The average value of solid composition of milk was shown in Table 5. The percentage of milk fat, protein, lactose, Solid Not Fat (SNF) and minerals in treated and control groups was 4.4, 4.0; 3.8, 3.5; 5.5, 5.3; 10.1, 10.1 and 0.6, 0.6, respectively.

Table 5 .. Solid compositions of milk samples

GroupsMilk composition (average values in percentage)

FatProteinLactoseSNFMinerals

Treated4.3563.7585.4810.0920.628
Control4.0183.4585.32410.0540.594

SNF = solid not fat.


The milk protein percentage was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated group than the control group. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in percentage of other milk components. Periparturient anthelmintic treatment reduced the gastrointestinal parasitic load and improved milk yield and protein percentage.

The efficacy of anthelmintic treatment at different stages of periparturient periods in groups A, B and C were 68.97%, 79.02% and 82.21%, respectively. The efficacy of treatment was corresponded to the findings of earlier studies (Singh et al., 1993; Gupta et al., 1989; Mahbub, 1996). Those studies reported 89.5∼100% efficacy against endoparasitic infection in cattle or other small ruminants reared in tradition system in Bangladesh. The present findings were coincided with the earlier researcher Ratnaparki et al. (1992) who report the efficacy of triclabendazole alone 80% in cattle. The very effective performance of triclabendazole along with levamisole against endoparasites in the current study also coincided with the performance of triclabendazole alone reported earlier in cattle (Mahbub, 1996). Moreover, using the levamisole (with triclabendazole) in this study could have trend of body weight gain (Hassan, 2012) modulated the body’s immune system to give necessary protection against different infectious organisms (Mahbub, 1996). However, in this study has not studied immune status and body weight gain with the administration of levamisole along with triclabendazole.

The average milk yield of cows of this study is supported by the other reporters (Haq et al., 1992; Gross et al., 1999) who found that deworming helps to increased milk production 0.5 litre per cow per day. Sanyal et al. (1992) reported that anthelmintics treated cows produces 142 litres more milk over 100 days, with extension of lactation length and reducing the length of time of onset of oestrus.

In this study milk protein percentage was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated cows without other milk components. The finding was coincided with findings of Faruque et al. (2007) who reported that anthemintic treatment with concentrate feed supplementation significantly increased milk protein and ash percentage. This results also has been supported by the Gross et al. (1999) and Reist et al. (2002) who reported that milk production increased (0.6 kg/day) with the yield of milk fat and protein percentage after anthelmintics treatment.

The present findings suggest that the periparturient anthelmintics treatment have shown very satisfactory performances in terms of the reducing of gastrointestinal parasitic load and the changing of milk components. Periparturient deworming may be used as the most efficient strategy to improve milk production and quality in cows.

  1. Alam M.G., Rahman M.A., Khatun M., and Ahmed J.U. (2009) Feed supplementation and weight change, milk yield and post-partum oestrus in Desi cows. The Bang. Vet. (Kiev) 26 (2): 39-47.
  2. (1999). Agricultural census-1996 National Series 1& II.
  3. (2003). Local Institutions and Livelihoods: Guidelines for Analysis. FAO, Rome.
  4. Gross S.J., Ryan W.G., and Ploeger H.W. (1999) Anthelmintic treatment of dairy cows and its effect on milk production. Vet. Rec 144 (21): 581-587.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Gupta S.C., Chandra R., and Yadav S.C. (1989) Efficacy of triclabendazole against experimental fasciola gigantica infection in sheep, goat, buffalo and rabbit: a comparative study. Indian Vet. J 66: 680-682.
  6. Haq S., Taimur M.J., Mian M.F., and Chowdhury S.M. (1992) Gastrointestinal helminths of cattle in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of , 78-82.
  7. Hassan MM, Ahasanul MH, and Azizul Islam SKM. (2012) Efficacy of anthelmintics against parasitic infections and their treatment effect on the production and blood indices in Black Bengal goats in Bangladesh. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci 36 (4): 400-408.
  8. Jabbar M., and Green D.A. (1983). The status and potential of livestock within the context of agricultural development policy in Bangladesh . The University of Wales, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.
  9. Kabir F., and Islam M.R. (2009) Comparative study on productive and reproductive performance of local and different crossbred dairy cows at Daulatpur, Khulna in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal 3 (2): 909-914.
  10. Faruque M.O., and Hossain M.I. (2007) The effect of feed supplement on the yield and composition of buffalo milk. Ital. J. Anim. Sci 6: 488-490.
  11. Mahbub A. (1996). Anthelmintic effi cacy against fasciliasis and gastrointestinal nematodiasis with haemato-biochemical changes in sheep and goats. MSc Thesis . Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
  12. Mondal S.C., Alam M.M., Rashid M.M., Ali M.Y., and Hossain M.M. (2005) Comparative study on the productive and reproductive performance of different dairy genotypes reared in Bangladesh Agricultural University Dairy Farm. Pak. J. Nutr 4 (4): 222-225.
    CrossRef
  13. Rahman M.H., Ahmed S., and Mondal M.M. (1996). Introduction to Helminth Parasites of Animals and Birds in Bangldesh , pp.17-18. Sheba Printing Press, Dhaka.
  14. Ratnaparhki M.R., Shastri U.V., Narlandkar B.W., Digraskar S.U., and Degloorkar N.M. (1992) A note on effi cacy of some flukicides against Fasciola infection in domestic animals. Indian J. Vet. Med 12: 20.
  15. Reist M., Medjitna T.D., Braun U., and Pfister K. (2002) Effect of a treatment with eprinomectin or trichlorfon on the yield and quality of milk produced by multiparous dairy cows. Vet. Rec 151 (13): 377-380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Sanyal P.K., Singh D.K., and Knox M.R. (1992) The effect of peri-parturient anthelmintic treatment on the productivity of dairy cattle in subtropical western India. Vet. Res. Commun 16 (6): 445-451.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Singh H., Gill J.S., and Bali H.S. (1993) Comparative field trials of five anthelmintics in sheep naturally infected with gast rointestinal nematodes. Indian J. Parasitol 17: 71-73.

Article

ARTICLE

Journal of Embryo Transfer 2014; 29(2): 171-175

Published online June 30, 2014 https://doi.org/10.12750/JET.2014.29.2.171

Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.

Effects of Periparturient Anthelmintic Treatment on the Milk Yield in Cows

Md. Faruk Islam1,†, Begum Fatema Zohara1, Nurjahan Begum2, and Md. Golam Shahi Alam3

1Department of Medicine, Surgery and Obstetrics, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh,
2Department of Parasitology, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh,
3Department of Surgery and Obstetrics Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh.

Correspondence to:Correspondence : faruk_vet@yahool.com

Received: February 10, 2014; Revised: March 22, 2014; Accepted: April 20, 2014

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal parasitic infestation in periparturient dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and quality. Sixty pregnant cows of 1st & 2nd parity were divided into four groups. The efficacy of anthelmintic treatment was evaluated by counting faecal egg per gram (EPG) compared with pre-treatment values. The milk yield of each cow was recorded in pre and post treatment lactations. Cows of group A were treated with Nitroxynil 10 mg/kg body weight subcutaneously 30 days before parturition, group B were treated with combination of triclabendazole and levamisole 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at calving and group C treated with Endex® at calving and 42 days after. The mean change in EPG 14 days after treatment was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated (79.1%) cows than control. Average milk yield of group C (2.8 ± 0.8) was significantly higher (p<0.01) than group A (2.6 ± 0.7). Similarly, the average milk yield in all the treated cows was significantly (p<0.01) higher in treated lactation (2.5 ± 0.7) than in the previous lactation (2.2 ± 0.7). The average milk yield in all treated cows was significantly (p<0.01) higher than the control cows. Although, milk yields were higher in second parity than the first, there was no significant difference (p>0.05). The milk protein percentage was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated group than the control group. Therefore, it may be concluded that periparturient anthelmintic treatment effectively reduced the gastrointestinal parasitic load and improved milk yield.

Keywords: cows, periparturient anthelmintics, milk yield, milk components, Bangladesh

INTRODUCTION

Cattle farming provide 39% of employment in agriculture sector, and 15% of total employment in the national economy. In Bangladesh, 20 million households keep 23 million of cattle heads under traditional farming system. The productivity of the animal with regard to fertility and milk yield is low. Domestic productions supplying 99% of market milk in Bangladesh. Total milk production of the country from cattle and buffaloes are 770,000 and 2,400 Metric ton respectively (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, 1999, 2003). Dairy milk production is only 14% of the minimum requirement (28 g/day). Milk availability per caput is approximately 30 g per day against 250 g. The average daily milk yield is ranges from 1.5 liter to 2.46 liter in indigenous cow (Alam et al., 2009, Kabir et al., 2009) and 2.1 liter to 12 liter in different crossbred type (Kabir et al., 2009, Mondal et al., 2005). Along with other constrains, parasitic infestation interrupts production potential of dairy cows in Bangladesh (Jabbar and Green, 1983). Parasitism results in a reduced nutrient supply to the host through voluntary reductions in food intake and reduced food efficiency and it has major detrimental effects on the efficiency of production of ruminants through losses up of to 50% are not uncommon. Deworming strategy can reduce the occurrence parasitic infestation and economic loss to ensure the continued production of milk. There is no comprehensive precise data are available on the effects of parasitism on milk yield in dairy cows of Bangladesh. This study was conducted to improve the quantity and quality of milk production through anthelmintic treatment during periparturient period in cows.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selection and Management of Animals

This study was carried out into the Bangladesh Agricultural University and Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science Technology University dairy farms and other areas of Belkuchi Upazila (Sub-district) in Sirajganj district and also in the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, BAU, Mymensing and the Department of Pathology and Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, HSTU, Dinajpur. The study were done from July 2011 to June 2013 on 60 multiparous mixed breed pregnant cows of first and second parity selected from Bangladesh Agricultural University Dairy farm (n=16), Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science & Technology University Dairy farm (n=19) and char island area (n=25) of Belkuchi Upazila (sub distrct) in Sirajganj district. The selected pregnant animals used only for dairy purpose during the study period. The animals were 5∼7 years old and on an average 125 to 172 kg body weight and all the animals were maintained under traditional farm condition of Bangladesh. All the animals were kept under the same managemental conditions. Rice straw was the staple feed for the cows and green grasses were available depending on the season. The calves were tied or tethered at the night and allow to free access or suckling to their dam during the whole day. The cows were milked once a day and only in the morning.

Grouping of Experimental Animals

A total of 60 mixed breed pregnant cows naturally infested with gastrointestinal parasites were selected from the three study areas for comparative stability trials of anthelmintics and their effects on milk quantity and quality. Cows were divided into four groups, A (n=18), B (n=14), C (n=16) and D (n=12). All cows of group A were treated with Nitroxynil (Dovenix®, MERIAL-17, Bourgelat 69002 Lyon-France) at the rate of 10 mg/kg body weight subcutaneously 30 days before parturition was due. Cows of group B were treated with triclabendazole and levamisole (Endex®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bangladesh) at the rate of 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at calving. Cows in group C were treated with triclabendazole and levamisole (Endex®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bangladesh) at the rate of 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at calving and 42 days after. Cows of group D were kept as untreated infected control.

Collection and Examination of Fecal Sample

Fecal samples were collected from freshly devoided faces or directly from the rectum of each experimental cow. Samples were collected in the morning for the evaluation of pre and post treatment egg load. Firstly the samples were examined for qualitative purpose by direct smear method and if the samples were positive then quantitative determination of helminthes egg was made by McMaster method as described by Rahman et al. (1996).

The efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal nematodiasis in dairy cows was based on the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT). The faecal samples were collected and examined before and after treatment at 7th and 14th day and EPG of faeces of each cow was recorded.

Collection and Examination of Milk Sample

Milk samples were collected from each cow once a month and analyzed for the percentage of milk fat, protein, lactose, solid not fat (SNF) and minerals. The milk compositions were analyzed by using the automated milk composition analyzer (MILKOTESTER®, Milk analyzing device, Model: MINI 3, Milkotester Ltd. BULGARIA).

Data Collection on Milk Yield

The daily milk yield by individual cow was recorded in liter to find out the total lactation yield during the study period.

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed for descriptive statistics (i.e. means, frequencies) using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 17.0) computer program. The SPSS package was used for performing t-test, for comparing the variables.

RESULTS

The efficacy of anthelmintic treatment at different stages of periparturient periods have been presented in Table 1. The cows of group A which were naturally infested with gastrointestinal nematode parasites treated with Nitroxynil at the rate of 10 mg/kg body weight subcutaneously 30 days before parturition was due. It showed the average EPG reduced from 506.1 ± 172.3 to 157.8 ± 24.9 and the percentage of EPG reduction was 68.97 on 14th day of post treatment i.e. efficacy of Nitroxynil was 68.97%. The cows of group B were treated with combination of triclabendazole and levamisole at the rate of 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at single dose during calving, where the average EPG reduced from 967.7 ± 237.1 to 172.0 ± 25.9 and the percentage of EPG reduction was 79.02 i.e.

Table 1.. Efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal parasites in dairy cows.

GroupsDrugs with dosePre-treatment EPG (Mean ± SD)Post-treatment EPG (Mean ± SD)% of EPG reduction on 14th dayP-value

A (n=18)Nitroxynil (Dovinix®) (1 ml/25 kg)506.11 ± 172.25157.78 ± 24.8668.970.01
B (n=14)Levamisol & Triclabendazol (Endex®) (19.5 mg/kgbwt.) at calving794.60 ± 310.5166.70 ± 26.279.020.01
C (n=16)Levamisol & Triclabendazol (Endex®) (19.5mg/kgbwt.) at calving + 42 days after967.67 ± 237.09172.00 ± 25.9182.210.01
D (n=12)Control (untreated)791.67 ± 268.52864.17 ± 290.71‒ 9.220.976
Over all treatedAnthelmintics794.58 ± 310.49166.67 ± 26.2079.090.01

efficacy of triclabendazole and levamisole was 79.02%. The cows of group C were treated with combination of triclabendazole and levamisole at the rate of 19.5 mg/kg body weight orally at double doses during calving and 42 days after, showed the average EPG fell from 794.6 ± 310.5 to 166.7 ± 26.2 and the percentage of EPG reduction was 82.21 i.e. efficacy of triclabendazole and levamisole was 82.21%. Whereas cows of group D (untreated control group), showed increased EPG from 791.7 ± 268.5 to 864.2 ± 290.7 i.e. on 14th day of post-treatment increased EPG was 9.22%. The mean change in EPG 14 days after treatment was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated (79.1%) cows than control (9.2%).

The average daily milk yield of all groups was shown in Table 2. The milk yield were in group A, B, C and D in lactations previous and treated lactation was 2.3 ± 0.7, 2.6 ± 0.7; 2.5 ± 0.8, 2.7 ± 0.9; 2.1 ± 0.6, 2.8 ± 0.8 and 2.2 ± 0.9, 2.2 ± 0.8 litres, respectively. Average milk yield of all treated groups was significantly higher (p<0.01) in treated lactation than the previous lactation.

Table 2.. Average daily milk yield (lit./cow) of all cows.

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

A (n=18)2.3 ± 0.72.6 ± 0.70.01
B (n=14)2.5 ± 0.82.7 ± 0.90.01
C (n=16)2.1 ± 0.62.8 ± 0.80.01
D (n=12)2.2 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.8NS

NS = not significant..


Table 3 shows the average milk yield in treated cows was significantly (p<0.01) higher in treated lactation (2.5 ± 0.7) than the previous lactation (2.2 ± 0.7) and similarly average milk yield was significantly (p<0.01) higher in treated group (2.5 ± 0.7) than the control group (2.2 ± 0.8).

Table 3.. The milk yield difference between two lactations.

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

Treated (n=48)2.2 ± 0.72.5 ± 0.70.01
Control (n=12)2.2 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.8NS

Although, milk yields were higher in second parity (2.5 ± 0.7) than the first (2.4 ± 0.7), there was no significant (p>0.05) difference (Table 4).

Table 4.. The milk yield of cow in different parities.

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

12.2 ± 0.72.4 ± 0.7NS
22.4 ± 0.72.5 ± 0.7

NS = not significant..


The average value of solid composition of milk was shown in Table 5. The percentage of milk fat, protein, lactose, Solid Not Fat (SNF) and minerals in treated and control groups was 4.4, 4.0; 3.8, 3.5; 5.5, 5.3; 10.1, 10.1 and 0.6, 0.6, respectively.

Table 5.. Solid compositions of milk samples.

GroupsMilk composition (average values in percentage)

FatProteinLactoseSNFMinerals

Treated4.3563.7585.4810.0920.628
Control4.0183.4585.32410.0540.594

SNF = solid not fat..


The milk protein percentage was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated group than the control group. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in percentage of other milk components. Periparturient anthelmintic treatment reduced the gastrointestinal parasitic load and improved milk yield and protein percentage.

Discussion

The efficacy of anthelmintic treatment at different stages of periparturient periods in groups A, B and C were 68.97%, 79.02% and 82.21%, respectively. The efficacy of treatment was corresponded to the findings of earlier studies (Singh et al., 1993; Gupta et al., 1989; Mahbub, 1996). Those studies reported 89.5∼100% efficacy against endoparasitic infection in cattle or other small ruminants reared in tradition system in Bangladesh. The present findings were coincided with the earlier researcher Ratnaparki et al. (1992) who report the efficacy of triclabendazole alone 80% in cattle. The very effective performance of triclabendazole along with levamisole against endoparasites in the current study also coincided with the performance of triclabendazole alone reported earlier in cattle (Mahbub, 1996). Moreover, using the levamisole (with triclabendazole) in this study could have trend of body weight gain (Hassan, 2012) modulated the body’s immune system to give necessary protection against different infectious organisms (Mahbub, 1996). However, in this study has not studied immune status and body weight gain with the administration of levamisole along with triclabendazole.

The average milk yield of cows of this study is supported by the other reporters (Haq et al., 1992; Gross et al., 1999) who found that deworming helps to increased milk production 0.5 litre per cow per day. Sanyal et al. (1992) reported that anthelmintics treated cows produces 142 litres more milk over 100 days, with extension of lactation length and reducing the length of time of onset of oestrus.

In this study milk protein percentage was significantly higher (p<0.05) in treated cows without other milk components. The finding was coincided with findings of Faruque et al. (2007) who reported that anthemintic treatment with concentrate feed supplementation significantly increased milk protein and ash percentage. This results also has been supported by the Gross et al. (1999) and Reist et al. (2002) who reported that milk production increased (0.6 kg/day) with the yield of milk fat and protein percentage after anthelmintics treatment.

The present findings suggest that the periparturient anthelmintics treatment have shown very satisfactory performances in terms of the reducing of gastrointestinal parasitic load and the changing of milk components. Periparturient deworming may be used as the most efficient strategy to improve milk production and quality in cows.

Table 1 .. Efficacy of anthelmintics against gastrointestinal parasites in dairy cows.

GroupsDrugs with dosePre-treatment EPG (Mean ± SD)Post-treatment EPG (Mean ± SD)% of EPG reduction on 14th dayP-value

A (n=18)Nitroxynil (Dovinix®) (1 ml/25 kg)506.11 ± 172.25157.78 ± 24.8668.970.01
B (n=14)Levamisol & Triclabendazol (Endex®) (19.5 mg/kgbwt.) at calving794.60 ± 310.5166.70 ± 26.279.020.01
C (n=16)Levamisol & Triclabendazol (Endex®) (19.5mg/kgbwt.) at calving + 42 days after967.67 ± 237.09172.00 ± 25.9182.210.01
D (n=12)Control (untreated)791.67 ± 268.52864.17 ± 290.71‒ 9.220.976
Over all treatedAnthelmintics794.58 ± 310.49166.67 ± 26.2079.090.01

Table 2 .. Average daily milk yield (lit./cow) of all cows.

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

A (n=18)2.3 ± 0.72.6 ± 0.70.01
B (n=14)2.5 ± 0.82.7 ± 0.90.01
C (n=16)2.1 ± 0.62.8 ± 0.80.01
D (n=12)2.2 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.8NS

NS = not significant..


Table 3 .. The milk yield difference between two lactations.

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

Treated (n=48)2.2 ± 0.72.5 ± 0.70.01
Control (n=12)2.2 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.8NS

Table 4 .. The milk yield of cow in different parities.

GroupsMilk yield (lit./cow)P-value

Previous lactationTreated lactation

12.2 ± 0.72.4 ± 0.7NS
22.4 ± 0.72.5 ± 0.7

NS = not significant..


Table 5 .. Solid compositions of milk samples.

GroupsMilk composition (average values in percentage)

FatProteinLactoseSNFMinerals

Treated4.3563.7585.4810.0920.628
Control4.0183.4585.32410.0540.594

SNF = solid not fat..


References

  1. Alam M.G., Rahman M.A., Khatun M., and Ahmed J.U. (2009) Feed supplementation and weight change, milk yield and post-partum oestrus in Desi cows. The Bang. Vet. (Kiev) 26 (2): 39-47.
  2. (1999). Agricultural census-1996 National Series 1& II.
  3. (2003). Local Institutions and Livelihoods: Guidelines for Analysis. FAO, Rome.
  4. Gross S.J., Ryan W.G., and Ploeger H.W. (1999) Anthelmintic treatment of dairy cows and its effect on milk production. Vet. Rec 144 (21): 581-587.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Gupta S.C., Chandra R., and Yadav S.C. (1989) Efficacy of triclabendazole against experimental fasciola gigantica infection in sheep, goat, buffalo and rabbit: a comparative study. Indian Vet. J 66: 680-682.
  6. Haq S., Taimur M.J., Mian M.F., and Chowdhury S.M. (1992) Gastrointestinal helminths of cattle in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the First Annual Conference of , 78-82.
  7. Hassan MM, Ahasanul MH, and Azizul Islam SKM. (2012) Efficacy of anthelmintics against parasitic infections and their treatment effect on the production and blood indices in Black Bengal goats in Bangladesh. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci 36 (4): 400-408.
  8. Jabbar M., and Green D.A. (1983). The status and potential of livestock within the context of agricultural development policy in Bangladesh . The University of Wales, Aberystwyth, United Kingdom.
  9. Kabir F., and Islam M.R. (2009) Comparative study on productive and reproductive performance of local and different crossbred dairy cows at Daulatpur, Khulna in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal 3 (2): 909-914.
  10. Faruque M.O., and Hossain M.I. (2007) The effect of feed supplement on the yield and composition of buffalo milk. Ital. J. Anim. Sci 6: 488-490.
  11. Mahbub A. (1996). Anthelmintic effi cacy against fasciliasis and gastrointestinal nematodiasis with haemato-biochemical changes in sheep and goats. MSc Thesis . Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh.
  12. Mondal S.C., Alam M.M., Rashid M.M., Ali M.Y., and Hossain M.M. (2005) Comparative study on the productive and reproductive performance of different dairy genotypes reared in Bangladesh Agricultural University Dairy Farm. Pak. J. Nutr 4 (4): 222-225.
    CrossRef
  13. Rahman M.H., Ahmed S., and Mondal M.M. (1996). Introduction to Helminth Parasites of Animals and Birds in Bangldesh , pp.17-18. Sheba Printing Press, Dhaka.
  14. Ratnaparhki M.R., Shastri U.V., Narlandkar B.W., Digraskar S.U., and Degloorkar N.M. (1992) A note on effi cacy of some flukicides against Fasciola infection in domestic animals. Indian J. Vet. Med 12: 20.
  15. Reist M., Medjitna T.D., Braun U., and Pfister K. (2002) Effect of a treatment with eprinomectin or trichlorfon on the yield and quality of milk produced by multiparous dairy cows. Vet. Rec 151 (13): 377-380.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  16. Sanyal P.K., Singh D.K., and Knox M.R. (1992) The effect of peri-parturient anthelmintic treatment on the productivity of dairy cattle in subtropical western India. Vet. Res. Commun 16 (6): 445-451.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Singh H., Gill J.S., and Bali H.S. (1993) Comparative field trials of five anthelmintics in sheep naturally infected with gast rointestinal nematodes. Indian J. Parasitol 17: 71-73.

JARB Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotehnology

qr code

OPEN ACCESS pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663