JARB Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotehnology

OPEN ACCESS pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663

Article Search

Original Article

Article Original Article
Split Viewer

Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2022; 37(3): 162-168

Published online September 30, 2022

https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.37.3.162

Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.

Mecoprop-p interrupts the development of zebrafish via apoptosis and vascular damage

Junho Park1,# , Garam An1,# , Hahyun Park1 , Taeyeon Hong2 , Gwonhwa Song1,* and Whasun Lim2,*

1Institute of Animal Molecular Biotechnology and Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
2Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea

Correspondence to: Gwonhwa Song
E-mail: ghsong@korea.ac.kr
Whasun Lim
E-mail: wlim@skku.edu

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received: July 25, 2022; Revised: August 18, 2022; Accepted: August 18, 2022

Mecoprop-p, a chlorophenoxy herbicide, has been widely used since the 1980s. Due to its high water solubility, it could be detected in the aquatic environment, as it has already been detected in the surface water or groundwater in several countries. The toxicity of other chlorophenoxy herbicides has been reported; however, there are few studies on the toxicity of mecoprop-p, one of the chlorophenoxy herbicides, on aquatic organisms. Here, we investigated the toxic effects of mecoprop-p using zebrafish. After mecoprop-p exposure, we observed that the zebrafish larvae eyes did not form normally, heart edema was generated, and the body length was shortened. The number of cells undergoing apoptosis also increased in the anterior part including head, heart, and yolk sac of the mecoprop-p-treated zebrafish compared to the untreated controls. Moreover, cardiovascular structures, including the heart and aortic arches, were also malformed after exposure to mecoprop-p. Therefore, our results suggest that mecoprop-p could cause abnormal development in zebrafish larvae and there is also a high possibility that mecoprop-p would be toxic to other aquatic organisms.

Keywords: abnormal development, apoptosis, cardiovascular toxicity, mecoprop-p, zebrafish

To regulate the growth of broad leaf weeds in crop fields, chlorophenoxy herbicides, including dicamba, mecoprop, mecorpop-p, and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid, are widely used (Sanchis et al., 2013; Mottier et al., 2014). The toxicities of several chlorophenoxy herbicides have been reported despite their widespread use. For example, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid can cause cerebrovascular impairments in rats by damaging the structure of the plasma membrane (Elo et al., 1988; Bradberry et al., 2000). Mecoprop-p, another chlorophenoxy herbicide, is a synthetic auxin that has been widely used to control weed growth since the 1980s (Périllon et al., 2021). It is known to be poorly absorbed in the soil but has a high water solubility of 250 mg/L at 20℃ (European Food Safety Authority [EFSA] et al., 2017; Périllon et al., 2021). Therefore, mecoprop-p will likely flow from the soil into the aquatic environment (EFSA et al., 2017; Périllon et al., 2021). Mecoprop-p was detected in the surface water in several countries; in particular, up to 103 μg/L of mecoprop-p was detected in aquatic environments in Canada (Périllon et al., 2021). However, few studies have been conducted on the toxicity of mecoprop-p to aquatic organisms.

Zebrafish is a widely used animal model for toxicological studies (Kimmel et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 2003). They can lay approximately 200 to 300 eggs per week and undergo rapid embryogenesis up to 5 days after fertilization (Kimmel et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 2003). Since the embryos of zebrafish are transparent, it is easy to observe their morphology and the development of their organs (He et al., 2014; Park et al., 2020). Because of these advantages, zebrafish are an optimal animal model for toxicology studies that can also predict aquatic toxicity (An et al., 2021; Ha et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2021; Park et al., 2021).

In this study, zebrafish embryos were used to evaluate the toxicity of mecoprop-p. Specifically, we investigated the viability of zebrafish and the abnormal formation of their organs after exposure to mecoprop-p. Moreover, we also verified the increase in the number of apoptotic cells and the extent of cardiovascular structure damage in zebrafish. These results indicate that mecoprop-p confers developmental toxicity to zebrafish and there is also a high possibility that mecoprop-p would be toxic to other aquatic organisms as zebrafish is considered as toxicological model that can reflect the toxicity aspects of other fish (Su et al., 2021).

Zebrafish breeding and embryo acquisition

Wild-type (AB strain) zebrafish and flk1:eGFP transgenic zebrafish were obtained from the Zebrafish Organogenesis Mutant Bank (KNRRCZOMB, Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea). The fish were maintained in a water tank at 28℃ with a 14-h/10-h light cycle. Also, the pH of the water was maintained between 6.9 to 7.5, UV-filtered and circulated by water filters. To acquire zebrafish embryos, pairs of females and males were placed in a breeding box that is separated the female and mael zebrafish by placing a partition in the middle and kept in the dark for 13 h. Afterward, light stimulation was provided for proper breeding, and an embryo medium (1X Danieau’s solution) was used to wash the embryos. To make 30X Danieau’s solution, 1740 mM NaCl, 21 mM KCl, 12 mM magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, 18 mM calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, and 150 mM HEPES were added in 1 L of distilled water. Then, it was diluted to 1X Danieau’s solution using distilled water to use as an embryo medium. After washing, the embryos were kept at 28℃. Animal experiments were conducted according to approved guidelines and regulations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Animal Ethics Committee in Korea University.

Mecoprop-p treatment

Mecoprop-p (Cat. No. 36773, Sigma Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in DMSO to make a 100 mg/L stock solution. A 0.03% 1-phenyl-2-thiourea embryo medium that disturbs pigmentation and facilitates observation was utilized to dilute the mecoprop-p stock solution to 25 and 50 mg/L concentrations. The negative controls were treated with 0.12% DMSO. We treated mecoprop-p to zebrafish larvae at 8 hpf, gastrula stage (García-Cambero et al., 2019). And the treatment was maintained until 96 hpf of zebrafish larvae. For each dose, 30 embryos were treated with different concentrations of mecoprop-p solutions and replaced treat solutions every day until 96 h after treatment. In each experiment, 12 zebrafish larvae were analyzed.

Observation of morphological abnormalities in zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p treatment

We used a Leica DM 2500 microscope (Leica, Germany) to identify the morphological abnormalities in zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p treatment. The eye size, body length, and the presence of heart edema were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The area of eyes and body length from head to end of tail fins were measured. The heart rate (beats per minute) was measured manually.

Determination of apoptotic cell number via acridine orange staining

We used acridine orange (AO; Cat No. A3568, Life Technologies, USA) to measure the number of apoptotic cells in zebrafish larvae (Tucker and Lardelli, 2007). After 96 h of mecoprop-p treatment, the zebrafish larvae were incubated at 28℃ with 5 μg/mL acridine orange for 1 h. Afterward, the zebrafish larvae were washed twice with 1 mL tricaine and anesthetized, placed on glass slides, and observed on an upright fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Imager, M1; ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany). The number of apoptotic cells was counted using ImageJ software.

Analysis of vascular damage in transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p treatment

The vasculature was confirmed using a transgenic zebrafish model wherein enhanced green fluorescent protein was tagged to the endothelial receptor, flk1 (Choi et al., 2007). After 96 h of mecoprop-p treatment, the zebrafish larvae were washed with 1 mL tricaine to remove the treat solution and anesthetize. The anesthetized zebrafish larvae were arranged on 3 % methylcellulose and observed under an upright fluorescence microscope. The microscopy images obtained were analyzed using ImageJ software to confirm the density of the aortic arches and the distance between the sinus venous (SV) and bulbus arteriosus (BA).

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to confirm the significance of the differences in the obtained data. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data from experiments are expressed as means and standard deviations.

Mecoprop-p caused morphological abnormalities during early development in zebrafish larvae

To evaluate the toxicity of mecoprop-p, we first identified the viability of zebrafish larvae exposed to 0, 25, and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p. There was no significant change in zebrafish larvae viability upon treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, with 100% and 96.6% viability, respectively (Fig. 1A). However, morphological abnormalities were detected upon mecoprop-p exposure (Fig. 1B). Eye size decreased by 76.1% and 53.3% upon treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L, respectively (Fig. 1C). Moreover, the body length of zebrafish larvae was reduced by 98.0% and 86.7% upon treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 1D). Heart edema increased significantly at 187.2% and 332.9% after treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 1E).

Figure 1. The adverse effects of mecoprop-p on developing zebrafish. (A) The viability of zebrafish at 96 h after mecoprop-p exposure. (B) Morphological changes induced by mecoprop-p. Scale bar: 500 µm. (C-E) Eye size, body length, and heart edema were measured using ImageJ software (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).

Mecoprop-p increased the incidence of uncontrolled apoptosis in the anterior region of zebrafish larvae

To further investigate the mechanisms underlying the developmental abnormalities after mecoprop-p treatment, we compared the number of apoptotic cells in the zebrafish larvae treated with different doses of mecoprop-p (0, 25, 50 mg/L) by staining with acridine orange. The number of apoptotic cells increased in the anterior part including eyes, ears, heart, and yolk sac of the zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p exposure, as shown by the green fluorescence images stained with acridine orange (Fig. 2A). Specifically, the number of apoptotic cells dramatically increased by 199.8% upon treatment with 25 mg/L mecoprop-p and 260.7% after treatment with 50 mg/L mecoprop-p (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2. Apoptotic cell death induced by mecoprop-p in zebrafish larvae was confirmed via acridine orange staining. (A) Apoptotic cells are indicated by green dots were indicated by the white arrows. Scale bar: 300 µm. (B) The number of apoptotic cells was calculated using ImageJ software (***p < 0.001).

Mecoprop-p exposure induced cardiovascular abnormalities

As the size of the heart edema and extent of apoptosis increased in the anterior part including eyes, ears, heart, and yolk sac of the zebrafish larvae, we further evaluated cardiovascular structure formation using a transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish model. Structural abnormalities in the heart and aortic arches such as increased SV-BA distance and decreased relative densities of aortic arches were observed following mecoprop-p treatment (Fig. 3A). The density of aortic arches decreased by 71.2% and 53.8% after treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 3B). The distance between the SV and BA increased by 117.4% and 181.8% after treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, the heart rate of the zebrafish larvae decreased by 92.3% and 88.6% after treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3. The structure of the heart and blood vessels that were damaged by mecoprop-p. (A) Transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish models were observed using an upright fluorescence microscope. The structural abnormalities in the heart and aortic arches are shown. The second panels are extended images of white boxes. Scale bar: 300 µm. (B and C) The density of the aortic arches and the distance between the SV and BA were calculated using ImageJ software. (D) The heart rate per minute was measured manually (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).

Mecoprop-p is a chlorophenoxy herbicide widely used since the 1980s (Périllon et al., 2021). It is known that mecoprop-p is poorly absorbed in the soil but has high water solubility (EFSA et al., 2017; Périllon et al., 2021). Such characteristics make mecoprop-p highly likely to be detected in the aquatic environment (EFSA et al., 2017; Périllon et al., 2021). Mecoprop-p has previously been detected in the groundwater or urban water in several countries such as Canada, the UK, and Ireland (Idowu et al., 2014; Périllon et al., 2021). However, despite these reports, there have been few studies on the toxicity of mecoprop-p to aquatic organisms, especially developmental toxicity. In this study, we confirmed the developmental toxicity of mecoprop-p using zebrafish larvae. We identified morphological changes such as heart edema, decreased eye size, and body length, and an increase in the number of apoptotic cells at the anterior part of zebrafish larvae including eyes, ears, heart and yolk sac upon mecoprop-p exposure. Moreover, cardiac vascular abnormalities like increased SV-BA distance and decreased density of aortic arches were observed after mecoprop-p treatment using flk1:eGFP transgenic zebrafish models.

First, we identified the survival rate of zebrafish larvae exposed to 0, 25, or 50 mg/L mecoprop-p. There was no significant difference in the survival rate of zebrafish larvae, but morphological abnormalities were observed in several organs. Eye size and body length tended to decrease after mecoprop-p exposure, typical symptoms of a developmental disorder (McCollum et al., 2011). Mecoprop-p also increased pericardiac edema, a representative indicator of cardiac toxicity (Zakaria et al., 2018). Actually, substances that are known to be cardiotoxic, like carbaryl and TCDD, commonly cause pericardiac edema and this suggested that mecoprop-p could have cardiovascular toxicity (Chen, 2013). As a result of exposure to mecoprop-p, the small size of eye, the shorten body length, and the heart edema were caused in the zebrafish larvae.

Next, we investigated the number of apoptotic cells in zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p exposure. Apoptosis in zebrafish is controlled by several proteins like Bcl2, Bid, and caspase 9 (Youle and Strasser, 2008; Chowdhury et al., 2008; Eimon and Ashkenazi, 2010). The proper control of apoptosis is important during normal development (Eimon and Ashkenazi, 2010), and the timing of apoptosis regulation during development is also different for each organ. For example, apoptosis is maximal at 36 hpf in the eyes and at 20 hpf in the tail. In the brain region, apoptotic cells were clustered between 24 and 60 hpf (Cole and Ross, 2001). Therefore, it is important to regulate apoptosis according to the normal developmental process (Voss and Strasser, 2020). However, we observed that the number of apoptotic cells increased significantly in the heart, ears, eyes, and yolk sac compared to the vehicle-treated groups at 96 h after mecoprop-p treatment. This result indicated that unregulated apoptosis due to mecoprop-p exposure could cause abnormal development in zebrafish larvae.

Pericardiac edema, one of the symptoms of cardiac toxicity, was observed upon mecoprop-p treatment (Chen, 2013; Zakaria et al., 2018). Therefore, we further investigated the structure of the heart and vasculature using a transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish model. In zebrafish, the heart develops at an early stage (Bakkers 2011; Zakaria et al., 2018). As heart development occurs in an early stage, blood flows normally and the blood vessels already develop (Burggren, 2013; Park et al., 2021). We also confirmed the abnormalities in the zebrafish larvae heart by measuring the distance between the SV and BA, which are used to evaluate cardiotoxicity and cardiac circulation (Cui et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2022). The distance between the SV and BA dramatically increased, and the heart rate decreased in the mecoprop-p-treated zebrafish larvae. The aortic arches, which are vascular structures located close to the heart, play important roles in blood flow and circulation from the heart (Isogai et al., 2001). They deliver deoxygenated or oxygenated blood to the brain and lungs (Crucke and Huysseune, 2013). We observed that the aortic arches were malformed after mecoprop-p exposure, as their relative density decreased in the mecoprop-p-treated groups compared to the vehicle-treated groups. These results indicate that mecoprop-p conferred cardiac toxicity as it induced malformations in the heart and vasculature, which play important roles in normal zebrafish development.

This study investigated the toxicity of mecoprop-p using zebrafish models. Mecoprop-p was shown to induce morphological abnormalities, such as decreased eye size and body length, and caused heart edema. Mecoprop-p also increased the number of apoptotic cells in the anterior part of the zebrafish and damaged the structures of the heart and aortic arches, which are important for normal blood flow. The results of this study indicated that since mecoprop-p could induce developmental toxicity in zebrafish by increasing apoptosis and inducing cardiovascular malformation, it might also be toxic to other aquatic organisms.

Conceptualization, G.S., and W.L.; methodology, J.P., G.A., H.P., and T.H.; investigation, J.P., G.A., H.P., and T.H.; data curation, J.P., G.A., H.P., T.H., G.S., and W.L.; visualization, J.P., and G.A.; writing-original draft, J.P., and G.A.; writing-review and editing, G.S., and W.L.; funding acquisition, G.S., and W.L.; supervision, G.S., and W.L.; project administration, G.S., and W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the pub-lished version of the manuscript.

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1A6A1A10073079) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2021R1A2C2005841). This study was also supported by the Institute of Animal Molecular Biotechnology, Korea University.

  1. An G, Park H, Song G, Lim W. 2021. Developmental toxicity of dimethachlor during zebrafish embryogenesis mediated by apoptosis and oxidative stress. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 36:2-8.
    CrossRef
  2. Bakkers J. 2011. Zebrafish as a model to study cardiac development and human cardiac disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 91:279-288.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Bradberry SM, Watt BE, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA. 2000. Mechanisms of toxicity, clinical features, and management of acute chlorophenoxy herbicide poisoning: a review. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 38:111-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Burggren WW. 2013. Cardiovascular development and angiogenesis in the early vertebrate embryo. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 4:234-245.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Chen J. 2013. Impaired cardiovascular function caused by different stressors elicits a common pathological and transcriptional response in zebrafish embryos. Zebrafish 10:389-400. (Erratum published 2014, Zebrafish 11:498).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Choi J, Dong L, Ahn J, Dao D, Hammerschmidt M, Chen JN. 2007. FoxH1 negatively modulates flk1 gene expression and vascular formation in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 304:735-744.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Chowdhury I, Tharakan B, Bhat GK. 2008. Caspases - an update. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 151:10-27.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Cole LK and Ross LS. 2001. Apoptosis in the developing zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol. 240:123-142.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Crucke J and Huysseune A. 2013. Unravelling the blood supply to the zebrafish pharyngeal jaws and teeth. J. Anat. 223:399-409.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Cui G, Chen H, Cui W, Guo X, Fang J, Liu A, Chen Y, Lee SMY. 2016. FGF2 prevents sunitinib-induced cardiotoxicity in zebrafish and cardiomyoblast H9c2 cells. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 16:46-53.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Eimon PM and Ashkenazi A. 2010. The zebrafish as a model organism for the study of apoptosis. Apoptosis 15:331-349.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Elo HA, Hervonen H, Ylitalo P. 1988. Comparative study on cerebrovascular injuries by three chlorophenoxyacetic acids (2,4-D, 2,4,5-T and MCPA). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Comp. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 90:65-68.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Arena M, Auteri D, Barmaz S, Bellisai G, Brancato A, Brocca D, Bura L, Byers H, Chiusolo A, Court Marques D, Crivellente F, De Lentdecker C, De Maglie M, Egsmose M, Erdos Z, Fait G, Ferreira L, Goumenou M, Greco L, Ippolito A, Istace F, Jarrah S, Kardassi D, Leuschner R, Lythgo C, Magrans JO, Medina P, Miron I, Molnar T, Nougadere A, Padovani L, Parra Morte JM, Pedersen R, Reich H, Sacchi A, Santos M, Serafimova R, Sharp R, Stanek A, Streissl F, Sturma J, Szentes C, Tarazona J, Terron A, Theobald A, Vagenende B, Verani A, Villamar-Bouza L. 2017. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mecoprop-P. EFSA J. 15:e04832.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. García-Cambero JP, Beltrán FJ, Encinas A, Rivas FJ, Oropesa AL. 2019. The added value of a zebrafish embryo-larval model in the assessment of wastewater tertiary treatments. Environ. Sci. (Camb.) 5:2269-2279.
    CrossRef
  15. Ha Y, Kim Y, Choi J, Hwang I, Ko JY, Jeon HK, Kim YJ. 2021. Evaluation of cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and zebrafish embryo toxicity of mixtures containing Hyssopus officinalis, Morus alba, Engraulis japonicus, and 27 other extracts for cosmetic safety assessment. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 17:221-232.
    CrossRef
  16. He JH, Gao JM, Huang CJ, Li CQ. 2014. Zebrafish models for assessing developmental and reproductive toxicity. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 42:35-42.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Idowu IA, Alkhaddar RM, Atherton W. 2014. Possible source term of high concentrations of mecoprop-p in leachate and water quality: impact of climate change, public use and disposal. Environ. Technol. 35:2055-2067.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Isogai S, Horiguchi M, Weinstein BM. 2001. The vascular anatomy of the developing zebrafish: an atlas of embryonic and early larval development. Dev. Biol. 230:278-301.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. 1995. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203:253-310.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Lee JW, Kim Y, Choi SJ, Kim SH, Ha CW, Jang S, Chae D, Sung S, Ham J, Sohn EH, Kim SN. 2021. Hosta longipes inhibits melanogenesis by reducing expression of the melanocortin 1 receptor. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 17:503-512.
    CrossRef
  21. Lu J, Wang W, Xu W, Zhang C, Zhang C, Tao L, Li Z, Zhang Y. 2022. Induction of developmental toxicity and cardiotoxicity in zebrafish embryos by Emamectin benzoate through oxidative stress. Sci. Total Environ. 825:154040.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. McCollum CW, Ducharme NA, Bondesson M, Gustafsson JA. 2011. Developmental toxicity screening in zebrafish. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 93:67-114.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Mottier A, Kientz-Bouchart V, Dubreule C, Serpentini A, Lebel JM, Costil K. 2014. Effects of acute exposures to mecoprop, mecoprop-p and their biodegradation product (2-MCP) on the larval stages of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Aquat. Toxicol. 146:165-175.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Park H, Lee JY, Park S, Song G, Lim W. 2020. Developmental toxicity of fipronil in early development of zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae: disrupted vascular formation with angiogenic failure and inhibited neurogenesis. J. Hazard. Mater. 385:121531.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Park H, Song G, Lim W. 2021. Isoprocarb induces acute toxicity in developing zebrafish embryos through vascular malformation. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 36:17-24.
    CrossRef
  26. Park H, Yun BH, Lim W, Song G. 2021. Dinitramine induces cardiotoxicity and morphological alterations on zebrafish embryo development. Aquat. Toxicol. 240:105982.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Périllon C, Feibicke M, Sahm R, Kusebauch B, Hönemann L, Mohr S. 2021. The auxin herbicide mecoprop-P in new light: filling the data gap for dicotyledonous macrophytes. Environ. Pollut. 272:116405.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Sanchis S, Polo AM, Tobajas M, Rodriguez JJ, Mohedano AF. 2013. Degradation of chlorophenoxy herbicides by coupled Fenton and biological oxidation. Chemosphere 93:115-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Su T, Lian D, Bai Y, Wang YYL, Zhang D, Wang Z, You J. 2021. The feasibility of the zebrafish embryo as a promising alternative for acute toxicity test using various fish species: a critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 787:147705.
    CrossRef
  30. Tucker B and Lardelli M. 2007. A rapid apoptosis assay measuring relative acridine orange fluorescence in zebrafish embryos. Zebrafish 4:113-116.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Voss AK and Strasser A. 2020. The essentials of developmental apoptosis. F1000Res. 9:F1000 Faculty Rev-148.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Youle RJ and Strasser A. 2008. The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:47-59.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Zakaria ZZ, Benslimane FM, Nasrallah GK, Shurbaji S, Younes NN, Mraiche F, Da'as SI, Yalcin HC. 2018. Using zebrafish for investigating the molecular mechanisms of drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Biomed Res. Int. 2018:1642684.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Zhang C, Willett C, Fremgen T. 2003. Zebrafish: an animal model for toxicological studies. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. Chapter 1:Unit1.7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Murray J, Kent R, Andersen D. 2004. Presence Levels and Relative Risks of Priority Pesticides in Selected Canadian Aquatic Ecosystems: An Environment Canada Pesticides Science Fund Project, Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp. 201.
    CrossRef

Article

Original Article

Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2022; 37(3): 162-168

Published online September 30, 2022 https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.37.3.162

Copyright © The Korean Society of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology.

Mecoprop-p interrupts the development of zebrafish via apoptosis and vascular damage

Junho Park1,# , Garam An1,# , Hahyun Park1 , Taeyeon Hong2 , Gwonhwa Song1,* and Whasun Lim2,*

1Institute of Animal Molecular Biotechnology and Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea
2Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Korea

Correspondence to:Gwonhwa Song
E-mail: ghsong@korea.ac.kr
Whasun Lim
E-mail: wlim@skku.edu

#These authors contributed equally to this work.

Received: July 25, 2022; Revised: August 18, 2022; Accepted: August 18, 2022

Abstract

Mecoprop-p, a chlorophenoxy herbicide, has been widely used since the 1980s. Due to its high water solubility, it could be detected in the aquatic environment, as it has already been detected in the surface water or groundwater in several countries. The toxicity of other chlorophenoxy herbicides has been reported; however, there are few studies on the toxicity of mecoprop-p, one of the chlorophenoxy herbicides, on aquatic organisms. Here, we investigated the toxic effects of mecoprop-p using zebrafish. After mecoprop-p exposure, we observed that the zebrafish larvae eyes did not form normally, heart edema was generated, and the body length was shortened. The number of cells undergoing apoptosis also increased in the anterior part including head, heart, and yolk sac of the mecoprop-p-treated zebrafish compared to the untreated controls. Moreover, cardiovascular structures, including the heart and aortic arches, were also malformed after exposure to mecoprop-p. Therefore, our results suggest that mecoprop-p could cause abnormal development in zebrafish larvae and there is also a high possibility that mecoprop-p would be toxic to other aquatic organisms.

Keywords: abnormal development, apoptosis, cardiovascular toxicity, mecoprop-p, zebrafish

INTRODUCTION

To regulate the growth of broad leaf weeds in crop fields, chlorophenoxy herbicides, including dicamba, mecoprop, mecorpop-p, and 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid, are widely used (Sanchis et al., 2013; Mottier et al., 2014). The toxicities of several chlorophenoxy herbicides have been reported despite their widespread use. For example, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid can cause cerebrovascular impairments in rats by damaging the structure of the plasma membrane (Elo et al., 1988; Bradberry et al., 2000). Mecoprop-p, another chlorophenoxy herbicide, is a synthetic auxin that has been widely used to control weed growth since the 1980s (Périllon et al., 2021). It is known to be poorly absorbed in the soil but has a high water solubility of 250 mg/L at 20℃ (European Food Safety Authority [EFSA] et al., 2017; Périllon et al., 2021). Therefore, mecoprop-p will likely flow from the soil into the aquatic environment (EFSA et al., 2017; Périllon et al., 2021). Mecoprop-p was detected in the surface water in several countries; in particular, up to 103 μg/L of mecoprop-p was detected in aquatic environments in Canada (Périllon et al., 2021). However, few studies have been conducted on the toxicity of mecoprop-p to aquatic organisms.

Zebrafish is a widely used animal model for toxicological studies (Kimmel et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 2003). They can lay approximately 200 to 300 eggs per week and undergo rapid embryogenesis up to 5 days after fertilization (Kimmel et al., 1995; Zhang et al., 2003). Since the embryos of zebrafish are transparent, it is easy to observe their morphology and the development of their organs (He et al., 2014; Park et al., 2020). Because of these advantages, zebrafish are an optimal animal model for toxicology studies that can also predict aquatic toxicity (An et al., 2021; Ha et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2021; Park et al., 2021).

In this study, zebrafish embryos were used to evaluate the toxicity of mecoprop-p. Specifically, we investigated the viability of zebrafish and the abnormal formation of their organs after exposure to mecoprop-p. Moreover, we also verified the increase in the number of apoptotic cells and the extent of cardiovascular structure damage in zebrafish. These results indicate that mecoprop-p confers developmental toxicity to zebrafish and there is also a high possibility that mecoprop-p would be toxic to other aquatic organisms as zebrafish is considered as toxicological model that can reflect the toxicity aspects of other fish (Su et al., 2021).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Zebrafish breeding and embryo acquisition

Wild-type (AB strain) zebrafish and flk1:eGFP transgenic zebrafish were obtained from the Zebrafish Organogenesis Mutant Bank (KNRRCZOMB, Kyungpook National University, Republic of Korea). The fish were maintained in a water tank at 28℃ with a 14-h/10-h light cycle. Also, the pH of the water was maintained between 6.9 to 7.5, UV-filtered and circulated by water filters. To acquire zebrafish embryos, pairs of females and males were placed in a breeding box that is separated the female and mael zebrafish by placing a partition in the middle and kept in the dark for 13 h. Afterward, light stimulation was provided for proper breeding, and an embryo medium (1X Danieau’s solution) was used to wash the embryos. To make 30X Danieau’s solution, 1740 mM NaCl, 21 mM KCl, 12 mM magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, 18 mM calcium nitrate tetrahydrate, and 150 mM HEPES were added in 1 L of distilled water. Then, it was diluted to 1X Danieau’s solution using distilled water to use as an embryo medium. After washing, the embryos were kept at 28℃. Animal experiments were conducted according to approved guidelines and regulations of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Animal Ethics Committee in Korea University.

Mecoprop-p treatment

Mecoprop-p (Cat. No. 36773, Sigma Aldrich, USA) was dissolved in DMSO to make a 100 mg/L stock solution. A 0.03% 1-phenyl-2-thiourea embryo medium that disturbs pigmentation and facilitates observation was utilized to dilute the mecoprop-p stock solution to 25 and 50 mg/L concentrations. The negative controls were treated with 0.12% DMSO. We treated mecoprop-p to zebrafish larvae at 8 hpf, gastrula stage (García-Cambero et al., 2019). And the treatment was maintained until 96 hpf of zebrafish larvae. For each dose, 30 embryos were treated with different concentrations of mecoprop-p solutions and replaced treat solutions every day until 96 h after treatment. In each experiment, 12 zebrafish larvae were analyzed.

Observation of morphological abnormalities in zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p treatment

We used a Leica DM 2500 microscope (Leica, Germany) to identify the morphological abnormalities in zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p treatment. The eye size, body length, and the presence of heart edema were analyzed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). The area of eyes and body length from head to end of tail fins were measured. The heart rate (beats per minute) was measured manually.

Determination of apoptotic cell number via acridine orange staining

We used acridine orange (AO; Cat No. A3568, Life Technologies, USA) to measure the number of apoptotic cells in zebrafish larvae (Tucker and Lardelli, 2007). After 96 h of mecoprop-p treatment, the zebrafish larvae were incubated at 28℃ with 5 μg/mL acridine orange for 1 h. Afterward, the zebrafish larvae were washed twice with 1 mL tricaine and anesthetized, placed on glass slides, and observed on an upright fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axio Imager, M1; ZEISS, Oberkochen, Germany). The number of apoptotic cells was counted using ImageJ software.

Analysis of vascular damage in transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p treatment

The vasculature was confirmed using a transgenic zebrafish model wherein enhanced green fluorescent protein was tagged to the endothelial receptor, flk1 (Choi et al., 2007). After 96 h of mecoprop-p treatment, the zebrafish larvae were washed with 1 mL tricaine to remove the treat solution and anesthetize. The anesthetized zebrafish larvae were arranged on 3 % methylcellulose and observed under an upright fluorescence microscope. The microscopy images obtained were analyzed using ImageJ software to confirm the density of the aortic arches and the distance between the sinus venous (SV) and bulbus arteriosus (BA).

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using SAS software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) to confirm the significance of the differences in the obtained data. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data from experiments are expressed as means and standard deviations.

RESULTS

Mecoprop-p caused morphological abnormalities during early development in zebrafish larvae

To evaluate the toxicity of mecoprop-p, we first identified the viability of zebrafish larvae exposed to 0, 25, and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p. There was no significant change in zebrafish larvae viability upon treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, with 100% and 96.6% viability, respectively (Fig. 1A). However, morphological abnormalities were detected upon mecoprop-p exposure (Fig. 1B). Eye size decreased by 76.1% and 53.3% upon treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L, respectively (Fig. 1C). Moreover, the body length of zebrafish larvae was reduced by 98.0% and 86.7% upon treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 1D). Heart edema increased significantly at 187.2% and 332.9% after treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 1E).

Figure 1.The adverse effects of mecoprop-p on developing zebrafish. (A) The viability of zebrafish at 96 h after mecoprop-p exposure. (B) Morphological changes induced by mecoprop-p. Scale bar: 500 µm. (C-E) Eye size, body length, and heart edema were measured using ImageJ software (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).

Mecoprop-p increased the incidence of uncontrolled apoptosis in the anterior region of zebrafish larvae

To further investigate the mechanisms underlying the developmental abnormalities after mecoprop-p treatment, we compared the number of apoptotic cells in the zebrafish larvae treated with different doses of mecoprop-p (0, 25, 50 mg/L) by staining with acridine orange. The number of apoptotic cells increased in the anterior part including eyes, ears, heart, and yolk sac of the zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p exposure, as shown by the green fluorescence images stained with acridine orange (Fig. 2A). Specifically, the number of apoptotic cells dramatically increased by 199.8% upon treatment with 25 mg/L mecoprop-p and 260.7% after treatment with 50 mg/L mecoprop-p (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2.Apoptotic cell death induced by mecoprop-p in zebrafish larvae was confirmed via acridine orange staining. (A) Apoptotic cells are indicated by green dots were indicated by the white arrows. Scale bar: 300 µm. (B) The number of apoptotic cells was calculated using ImageJ software (***p < 0.001).

Mecoprop-p exposure induced cardiovascular abnormalities

As the size of the heart edema and extent of apoptosis increased in the anterior part including eyes, ears, heart, and yolk sac of the zebrafish larvae, we further evaluated cardiovascular structure formation using a transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish model. Structural abnormalities in the heart and aortic arches such as increased SV-BA distance and decreased relative densities of aortic arches were observed following mecoprop-p treatment (Fig. 3A). The density of aortic arches decreased by 71.2% and 53.8% after treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 3B). The distance between the SV and BA increased by 117.4% and 181.8% after treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, the heart rate of the zebrafish larvae decreased by 92.3% and 88.6% after treatment with 25 mg/L and 50 mg/L mecoprop-p, respectively (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.The structure of the heart and blood vessels that were damaged by mecoprop-p. (A) Transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish models were observed using an upright fluorescence microscope. The structural abnormalities in the heart and aortic arches are shown. The second panels are extended images of white boxes. Scale bar: 300 µm. (B and C) The density of the aortic arches and the distance between the SV and BA were calculated using ImageJ software. (D) The heart rate per minute was measured manually (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Mecoprop-p is a chlorophenoxy herbicide widely used since the 1980s (Périllon et al., 2021). It is known that mecoprop-p is poorly absorbed in the soil but has high water solubility (EFSA et al., 2017; Périllon et al., 2021). Such characteristics make mecoprop-p highly likely to be detected in the aquatic environment (EFSA et al., 2017; Périllon et al., 2021). Mecoprop-p has previously been detected in the groundwater or urban water in several countries such as Canada, the UK, and Ireland (Idowu et al., 2014; Périllon et al., 2021). However, despite these reports, there have been few studies on the toxicity of mecoprop-p to aquatic organisms, especially developmental toxicity. In this study, we confirmed the developmental toxicity of mecoprop-p using zebrafish larvae. We identified morphological changes such as heart edema, decreased eye size, and body length, and an increase in the number of apoptotic cells at the anterior part of zebrafish larvae including eyes, ears, heart and yolk sac upon mecoprop-p exposure. Moreover, cardiac vascular abnormalities like increased SV-BA distance and decreased density of aortic arches were observed after mecoprop-p treatment using flk1:eGFP transgenic zebrafish models.

First, we identified the survival rate of zebrafish larvae exposed to 0, 25, or 50 mg/L mecoprop-p. There was no significant difference in the survival rate of zebrafish larvae, but morphological abnormalities were observed in several organs. Eye size and body length tended to decrease after mecoprop-p exposure, typical symptoms of a developmental disorder (McCollum et al., 2011). Mecoprop-p also increased pericardiac edema, a representative indicator of cardiac toxicity (Zakaria et al., 2018). Actually, substances that are known to be cardiotoxic, like carbaryl and TCDD, commonly cause pericardiac edema and this suggested that mecoprop-p could have cardiovascular toxicity (Chen, 2013). As a result of exposure to mecoprop-p, the small size of eye, the shorten body length, and the heart edema were caused in the zebrafish larvae.

Next, we investigated the number of apoptotic cells in zebrafish larvae after mecoprop-p exposure. Apoptosis in zebrafish is controlled by several proteins like Bcl2, Bid, and caspase 9 (Youle and Strasser, 2008; Chowdhury et al., 2008; Eimon and Ashkenazi, 2010). The proper control of apoptosis is important during normal development (Eimon and Ashkenazi, 2010), and the timing of apoptosis regulation during development is also different for each organ. For example, apoptosis is maximal at 36 hpf in the eyes and at 20 hpf in the tail. In the brain region, apoptotic cells were clustered between 24 and 60 hpf (Cole and Ross, 2001). Therefore, it is important to regulate apoptosis according to the normal developmental process (Voss and Strasser, 2020). However, we observed that the number of apoptotic cells increased significantly in the heart, ears, eyes, and yolk sac compared to the vehicle-treated groups at 96 h after mecoprop-p treatment. This result indicated that unregulated apoptosis due to mecoprop-p exposure could cause abnormal development in zebrafish larvae.

Pericardiac edema, one of the symptoms of cardiac toxicity, was observed upon mecoprop-p treatment (Chen, 2013; Zakaria et al., 2018). Therefore, we further investigated the structure of the heart and vasculature using a transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish model. In zebrafish, the heart develops at an early stage (Bakkers 2011; Zakaria et al., 2018). As heart development occurs in an early stage, blood flows normally and the blood vessels already develop (Burggren, 2013; Park et al., 2021). We also confirmed the abnormalities in the zebrafish larvae heart by measuring the distance between the SV and BA, which are used to evaluate cardiotoxicity and cardiac circulation (Cui et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2022). The distance between the SV and BA dramatically increased, and the heart rate decreased in the mecoprop-p-treated zebrafish larvae. The aortic arches, which are vascular structures located close to the heart, play important roles in blood flow and circulation from the heart (Isogai et al., 2001). They deliver deoxygenated or oxygenated blood to the brain and lungs (Crucke and Huysseune, 2013). We observed that the aortic arches were malformed after mecoprop-p exposure, as their relative density decreased in the mecoprop-p-treated groups compared to the vehicle-treated groups. These results indicate that mecoprop-p conferred cardiac toxicity as it induced malformations in the heart and vasculature, which play important roles in normal zebrafish development.

CONCLUSION

This study investigated the toxicity of mecoprop-p using zebrafish models. Mecoprop-p was shown to induce morphological abnormalities, such as decreased eye size and body length, and caused heart edema. Mecoprop-p also increased the number of apoptotic cells in the anterior part of the zebrafish and damaged the structures of the heart and aortic arches, which are important for normal blood flow. The results of this study indicated that since mecoprop-p could induce developmental toxicity in zebrafish by increasing apoptosis and inducing cardiovascular malformation, it might also be toxic to other aquatic organisms.

Acknowledgements

None.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.S., and W.L.; methodology, J.P., G.A., H.P., and T.H.; investigation, J.P., G.A., H.P., and T.H.; data curation, J.P., G.A., H.P., T.H., G.S., and W.L.; visualization, J.P., and G.A.; writing-original draft, J.P., and G.A.; writing-review and editing, G.S., and W.L.; funding acquisition, G.S., and W.L.; supervision, G.S., and W.L.; project administration, G.S., and W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the pub-lished version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1A6A1A10073079) and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2021R1A2C2005841). This study was also supported by the Institute of Animal Molecular Biotechnology, Korea University.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent to Publish

Not applicable.

Availability of Data and Materials

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig 1.

Figure 1.The adverse effects of mecoprop-p on developing zebrafish. (A) The viability of zebrafish at 96 h after mecoprop-p exposure. (B) Morphological changes induced by mecoprop-p. Scale bar: 500 µm. (C-E) Eye size, body length, and heart edema were measured using ImageJ software (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2022; 37: 162-168https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.37.3.162

Fig 2.

Figure 2.Apoptotic cell death induced by mecoprop-p in zebrafish larvae was confirmed via acridine orange staining. (A) Apoptotic cells are indicated by green dots were indicated by the white arrows. Scale bar: 300 µm. (B) The number of apoptotic cells was calculated using ImageJ software (***p < 0.001).
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2022; 37: 162-168https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.37.3.162

Fig 3.

Figure 3.The structure of the heart and blood vessels that were damaged by mecoprop-p. (A) Transgenic flk1:eGFP zebrafish models were observed using an upright fluorescence microscope. The structural abnormalities in the heart and aortic arches are shown. The second panels are extended images of white boxes. Scale bar: 300 µm. (B and C) The density of the aortic arches and the distance between the SV and BA were calculated using ImageJ software. (D) The heart rate per minute was measured manually (**p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).
Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotechnology 2022; 37: 162-168https://doi.org/10.12750/JARB.37.3.162

References

  1. An G, Park H, Song G, Lim W. 2021. Developmental toxicity of dimethachlor during zebrafish embryogenesis mediated by apoptosis and oxidative stress. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 36:2-8.
    CrossRef
  2. Bakkers J. 2011. Zebrafish as a model to study cardiac development and human cardiac disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 91:279-288.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  3. Bradberry SM, Watt BE, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA. 2000. Mechanisms of toxicity, clinical features, and management of acute chlorophenoxy herbicide poisoning: a review. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol. 38:111-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  4. Burggren WW. 2013. Cardiovascular development and angiogenesis in the early vertebrate embryo. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 4:234-245.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  5. Chen J. 2013. Impaired cardiovascular function caused by different stressors elicits a common pathological and transcriptional response in zebrafish embryos. Zebrafish 10:389-400. (Erratum published 2014, Zebrafish 11:498).
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  6. Choi J, Dong L, Ahn J, Dao D, Hammerschmidt M, Chen JN. 2007. FoxH1 negatively modulates flk1 gene expression and vascular formation in zebrafish. Dev. Biol. 304:735-744.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  7. Chowdhury I, Tharakan B, Bhat GK. 2008. Caspases - an update. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 151:10-27.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  8. Cole LK and Ross LS. 2001. Apoptosis in the developing zebrafish embryo. Dev. Biol. 240:123-142.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  9. Crucke J and Huysseune A. 2013. Unravelling the blood supply to the zebrafish pharyngeal jaws and teeth. J. Anat. 223:399-409.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  10. Cui G, Chen H, Cui W, Guo X, Fang J, Liu A, Chen Y, Lee SMY. 2016. FGF2 prevents sunitinib-induced cardiotoxicity in zebrafish and cardiomyoblast H9c2 cells. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 16:46-53.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  11. Eimon PM and Ashkenazi A. 2010. The zebrafish as a model organism for the study of apoptosis. Apoptosis 15:331-349.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  12. Elo HA, Hervonen H, Ylitalo P. 1988. Comparative study on cerebrovascular injuries by three chlorophenoxyacetic acids (2,4-D, 2,4,5-T and MCPA). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Comp. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 90:65-68.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  13. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Arena M, Auteri D, Barmaz S, Bellisai G, Brancato A, Brocca D, Bura L, Byers H, Chiusolo A, Court Marques D, Crivellente F, De Lentdecker C, De Maglie M, Egsmose M, Erdos Z, Fait G, Ferreira L, Goumenou M, Greco L, Ippolito A, Istace F, Jarrah S, Kardassi D, Leuschner R, Lythgo C, Magrans JO, Medina P, Miron I, Molnar T, Nougadere A, Padovani L, Parra Morte JM, Pedersen R, Reich H, Sacchi A, Santos M, Serafimova R, Sharp R, Stanek A, Streissl F, Sturma J, Szentes C, Tarazona J, Terron A, Theobald A, Vagenende B, Verani A, Villamar-Bouza L. 2017. Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance mecoprop-P. EFSA J. 15:e04832.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  14. García-Cambero JP, Beltrán FJ, Encinas A, Rivas FJ, Oropesa AL. 2019. The added value of a zebrafish embryo-larval model in the assessment of wastewater tertiary treatments. Environ. Sci. (Camb.) 5:2269-2279.
    CrossRef
  15. Ha Y, Kim Y, Choi J, Hwang I, Ko JY, Jeon HK, Kim YJ. 2021. Evaluation of cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and zebrafish embryo toxicity of mixtures containing Hyssopus officinalis, Morus alba, Engraulis japonicus, and 27 other extracts for cosmetic safety assessment. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 17:221-232.
    CrossRef
  16. He JH, Gao JM, Huang CJ, Li CQ. 2014. Zebrafish models for assessing developmental and reproductive toxicity. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 42:35-42.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  17. Idowu IA, Alkhaddar RM, Atherton W. 2014. Possible source term of high concentrations of mecoprop-p in leachate and water quality: impact of climate change, public use and disposal. Environ. Technol. 35:2055-2067.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  18. Isogai S, Horiguchi M, Weinstein BM. 2001. The vascular anatomy of the developing zebrafish: an atlas of embryonic and early larval development. Dev. Biol. 230:278-301.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  19. Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. 1995. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 203:253-310.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  20. Lee JW, Kim Y, Choi SJ, Kim SH, Ha CW, Jang S, Chae D, Sung S, Ham J, Sohn EH, Kim SN. 2021. Hosta longipes inhibits melanogenesis by reducing expression of the melanocortin 1 receptor. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 17:503-512.
    CrossRef
  21. Lu J, Wang W, Xu W, Zhang C, Zhang C, Tao L, Li Z, Zhang Y. 2022. Induction of developmental toxicity and cardiotoxicity in zebrafish embryos by Emamectin benzoate through oxidative stress. Sci. Total Environ. 825:154040.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  22. McCollum CW, Ducharme NA, Bondesson M, Gustafsson JA. 2011. Developmental toxicity screening in zebrafish. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 93:67-114.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  23. Mottier A, Kientz-Bouchart V, Dubreule C, Serpentini A, Lebel JM, Costil K. 2014. Effects of acute exposures to mecoprop, mecoprop-p and their biodegradation product (2-MCP) on the larval stages of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Aquat. Toxicol. 146:165-175.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  24. Park H, Lee JY, Park S, Song G, Lim W. 2020. Developmental toxicity of fipronil in early development of zebrafish (Danio rerio) larvae: disrupted vascular formation with angiogenic failure and inhibited neurogenesis. J. Hazard. Mater. 385:121531.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  25. Park H, Song G, Lim W. 2021. Isoprocarb induces acute toxicity in developing zebrafish embryos through vascular malformation. J. Anim. Reprod. Biotechnol. 36:17-24.
    CrossRef
  26. Park H, Yun BH, Lim W, Song G. 2021. Dinitramine induces cardiotoxicity and morphological alterations on zebrafish embryo development. Aquat. Toxicol. 240:105982.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  27. Périllon C, Feibicke M, Sahm R, Kusebauch B, Hönemann L, Mohr S. 2021. The auxin herbicide mecoprop-P in new light: filling the data gap for dicotyledonous macrophytes. Environ. Pollut. 272:116405.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  28. Sanchis S, Polo AM, Tobajas M, Rodriguez JJ, Mohedano AF. 2013. Degradation of chlorophenoxy herbicides by coupled Fenton and biological oxidation. Chemosphere 93:115-122.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  29. Su T, Lian D, Bai Y, Wang YYL, Zhang D, Wang Z, You J. 2021. The feasibility of the zebrafish embryo as a promising alternative for acute toxicity test using various fish species: a critical review. Sci. Total Environ. 787:147705.
    CrossRef
  30. Tucker B and Lardelli M. 2007. A rapid apoptosis assay measuring relative acridine orange fluorescence in zebrafish embryos. Zebrafish 4:113-116.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  31. Voss AK and Strasser A. 2020. The essentials of developmental apoptosis. F1000Res. 9:F1000 Faculty Rev-148.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  32. Youle RJ and Strasser A. 2008. The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:47-59.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  33. Zakaria ZZ, Benslimane FM, Nasrallah GK, Shurbaji S, Younes NN, Mraiche F, Da'as SI, Yalcin HC. 2018. Using zebrafish for investigating the molecular mechanisms of drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Biomed Res. Int. 2018:1642684.
    Pubmed KoreaMed CrossRef
  34. Zhang C, Willett C, Fremgen T. 2003. Zebrafish: an animal model for toxicological studies. Curr. Protoc. Toxicol. Chapter 1:Unit1.7.
    Pubmed CrossRef
  35. Murray J, Kent R, Andersen D. 2004. Presence Levels and Relative Risks of Priority Pesticides in Selected Canadian Aquatic Ecosystems: An Environment Canada Pesticides Science Fund Project, Environment Canada, Ottawa, pp. 201.
    CrossRef

JARB Journal of Animal Reproduction and Biotehnology

qr code

OPEN ACCESS pISSN: 2671-4639
eISSN: 2671-4663